This news article below is the perfect example (assuming Reuters News Service doesn’t provide fake news) of national security
trumping human rights (no pun intended). Yours and everyone else's.
The ‘progressive’
fear of framing human rights protection in the context of national security is
understandable. But since the creation
of the UDHR (perhaps even the Bible), the
only sustainable means of ensuring national security (security of any kind) is
ensuring that human rights always trumps the rights of nations (national sovereignty)
to do as they please undercover of a powerless UN system.
Until each
of the major movements (Peace and Justice, environmental, and social/economic
justice) acknowledge, join, and act together on this fundamental principle – it
is inevitable that human freedom and security will continue to be diminished given
the evolution of weaponry and war, the de-evolution of the environment, and the
acceleration of dysfunctional economic justice.
"Special Report: Inside the
UAE’s secret hacking team of U.S. mercenaries"
Christopher
Bing, Joel Schectman January
30, 2019
WASHINGTON
(Reuters) - Two weeks after leaving her position as an intelligence analyst for
the U.S. National Security Agency in 2014, Lori Stroud was in the Middle East
working as a hacker for an Arab monarchy.
She
had joined Project Raven, a clandestine team that included more than a dozen
former U.S. intelligence operatives recruited to help the United Arab Emirates
engage in surveillance of other governments, militants and human rights
activists critical of the monarchy.
Stroud
and her team, working from a converted mansion in Abu Dhabi known internally as
“the Villa,” would use methods learned from a decade in the U.S intelligence
community to help the UAE hack into the phones and computers of its enemies.
Stroud
had been recruited by a Maryland cyber security contractor to help the Emiratis
launch hacking operations, and for three years, she thrived in the job. But in
2016, the Emiratis moved Project Raven to a UAE cyber security firm named
DarkMatter. Before long, Stroud and other Americans involved in the effort say
they saw the mission cross a red line: targeting fellow Americans for
surveillance.
“I am
working for a foreign intelligence agency who is targeting U.S. persons,” she
told Reuters. “I am officially the bad kind of spy.”
The
story of Project Raven reveals how former U.S. government hackers have employed
state-of-the-art cyber-espionage tools on behalf of a foreign intelligence
service that spies on human rights activists, journalists and political rivals.
Interviews
with nine former Raven operatives, along with a review of thousands of pages of
project documents and emails, show that surveillance techniques taught by the
NSA were central to the UAE’s efforts to monitor opponents. The sources interviewed
by Reuters were not Emirati citizens.
The
operatives utilized an arsenal of cyber tools, including a cutting-edge
espionage platform known as Karma, in which Raven operatives say they hacked
into the iPhones of hundreds of activists, political leaders and suspected
terrorists. Details of the Karma hack were described in a separate Reuters
article today.
An
NSA spokesman declined to comment on Raven. An Apple spokeswoman declined to
comment. A spokeswoman for UAE’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs declined to
comment. The UAE’s Embassy in Washington and a spokesman for its National Media
Council did not respond to requests for comment.
The
UAE has said it faces a real threat from violent extremist groups and that it
is cooperating with the United States on counter-terrorism efforts. Former
Raven operatives say the project helped NESA break up an ISIS network within
the Emirates. When an ISIS-inspired militant stabbed to death a teacher in Abu
Dhabi in 2014, the operatives say, Raven spearheaded the UAE effort to assess
if other attacks were imminent.
Various
reports have highlighted the ongoing cyber arms race in the Middle East, as the
Emirates and other nations attempt to sweep up hacking weapons and personnel
faster than their rivals. The Reuters investigation is the first to reveal the
existence of Project Raven, providing a rare inside account of state hacking
operations usually shrouded in secrecy and denials.
The
Raven story also provides new insight into the role former American cyberspies
play in foreign hacking operations. Within the U.S. intelligence community,
leaving to work as an operative for another country is seen by some as a
betrayal. “There’s a moral obligation if you’re a former intelligence officer
from becoming effectively a mercenary for a foreign government,” said Bob
Anderson, who served as executive assistant director of the Federal Bureau of
Investigation until 2015.
While
this activity raises ethical dilemmas, U.S. national security lawyers say the
laws guiding what American intelligence contractors can do abroad are murky.
Though it’s illegal to share classified information, there is no specific law
that bars contractors from sharing more general spycraft knowhow, such as how
to bait a target with a virus-laden email.
The
rules, however, are clear on hacking U.S. networks or stealing the
communications of Americans. “It would be very illegal,” said Rhea Siers,
former NSA deputy assistant director for policy.
The
hacking of Americans was a tightly held secret even within Raven, with those
operations led by Emiratis instead. Stroud’s account of the targeting of
Americans was confirmed by four other former operatives and in emails reviewed
by Reuters.
The
FBI is now investigating whether Raven’s American staff leaked classified U.S.
surveillance techniques and if they illegally targeted American computer
networks, according to former Raven employees interviewed by federal law
enforcement agents. Stroud said she is cooperating with that investigation. No
charges have been filed and it is possible none will emerge from the inquiry.
An FBI spokeswoman declined to comment.
PURPLE
BRIEFING, BLACK BRIEFING
Stroud
is the only former Raven operative willing to be named in this story; eight
others who described their experiences would do so only on condition of
anonymity. She spent a decade at the NSA, first as a military service member
from 2003 to 2009 and later as a contractor in the agency for the giant
technology consultant Booz Allen Hamilton from 2009 to 2014. Her specialty was
hunting for vulnerabilities in the computer systems of foreign governments,
such as China, and analyzing what data should be stolen.
In
2013, her world changed. While stationed at NSA Hawaii, Stroud says, she made
the fateful recommendation to bring a Dell technician already working in the
building onto her team. That contractor was Edward Snowden.
“He’s
former CIA, he’s local, he’s already cleared,” Stroud, 37, recalled. “He’s
perfect!” Booz and the NSA would later approve Snowden’s transfer, providing
him with even greater access to classified material.
Two
months after joining Stroud’s group, Snowden fled the United States and passed
on thousands of pages of top secret program files to journalists, detailing the
agency’s massive data collection programs. In the maelstrom that followed,
Stroud said her Booz team was vilified for unwittingly enabling the largest
security breach in agency history.
“Our
brand was ruined,” she said of her team.
In
the wake of the scandal, Marc Baier, a former colleague at NSA Hawaii, offered
her the chance to work for a contractor in Abu Dhabi called CyberPoint. In May
2014, Stroud jumped at the opportunity and left Booz Allen.
CyberPoint,
a small cyber security contractor headquartered in Baltimore, was founded by an
entrepreneur named Karl Gumtow in 2009. Its clients have included the U.S.
Department of Defense, and its UAE business has gained media attention.
In an
interview, Gumtow said his company was not involved in any improper actions.
Stroud
had already made the switch from government employee to Booz Allen contractor,
essentially performing the same NSA job at higher pay. Taking a job with
CyberPoint would fulfill a lifelong dream of deploying to the Middle East and
doing so at a lucrative salary. Many analysts, like Stroud, were paid more than
$200,000 a year, and some managers received salaries and compensation above
$400,000.
She
understood her new job would involve a counterterrorism mission in cooperation
with the Emiratis, a close U.S. ally in the fight against ISIS, but little
else. Baier and other Raven managers assured her the project was approved by
the NSA, she said. With Baier’s impressive resume, including time in an elite
NSA hacking unit known as Tailored Access Operations, the pledge was
convincing. Baier did not respond to multiple phone calls, text messages,
emails, and messages on social media.
In
the highly secretive, compartmentalized world of intelligence contracting, it
isn’t unusual for recruiters to keep the mission and client from potential
hires until they sign non-disclosure documents and go through a briefing
process.
When
Stroud was brought into the Villa for the first time, in May 2014, Raven
management gave her two separate briefings, back-to-back.
In
the first, known internally as the “Purple briefing,” she said she was told
Raven would pursue a purely defensive mission, protecting the government of the
UAE from hackers and other threats. Right after the briefing ended, she said
she was told she had just received a cover story.
She
then received the “Black briefing,” a copy of which was reviewed by Reuters.
Raven is “the offensive, operational division of NESA and will never be
acknowledged to the general public,” the Black memo says. The NESA, or National
Electronic Security Authority, was the UAE’s version of the NSA.
Stroud
would be part of Raven’s analysis and target-development shop, tasked with
helping the government profile its enemies online, hack them and collect data.
Those targets were provided by the client, NESA, now called the Signals
Intelligence Agency.
The language
and secrecy of the briefings closely mirrored her experience at the NSA, Stroud
said, giving her a level of comfort.
The
information scooped up by Raven was feeding a security apparatus that has drawn
international criticism. The Emirates, a wealthy federation of seven Arab
sheikhdoms with a population of 9 million, is an ally of neighbor Saudi Arabia
and rival of Iran.
Like
those two regional powers, the UAE has been accused of suppressing free speech,
detaining dissidents and other abuses by groups such as Human Rights Watch. The
UAE says it is working closely with Washington to fight extremism “beyond the
battlefield” and is promoting efforts to counter the “root causes” of radical
violence.
Raven’s
targets eventually would include militants in Yemen, foreign adversaries such
as Iran, Qatar and Turkey, and individuals who criticized the monarchy, said
Stroud and eight other former Raven operatives. Their accounts were confirmed
by hundreds of Raven program documents reviewed by Reuters.
Under
orders from the UAE government, former operatives said, Raven would monitor
social media and target people who security forces felt had insulted the
government.
“Some
days it was hard to swallow, like [when you target] a 16-year-old kid on
Twitter,” she said. “But it’s an intelligence mission, you are an intelligence
operative. I never made it personal.”
The
Americans identified vulnerabilities in selected targets, developed or procured
software to carry out the intrusions and assisted in monitoring them, former
Raven employees said. But an Emirati operative would usually press the button
on an attack. This arrangement was intended to give the Americans “plausible
deniability” about the nature of the work, said former Raven members.
TARGETING
‘GYRO’ AND ‘EGRET’
Stroud
discovered that the program took aim not just at terrorists and foreign
government agencies, but also dissidents and human rights activists. The
Emiratis categorized them as national security targets.
Following
the Arab Spring protests and the ousting of Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak in
2011, Emirati security forces viewed human rights advocates as a major threat
to “national stability,” records and interviews show.
One
of the program’s key targets in 2012 was Rori Donaghy, according to former
Raven operatives and program documents. Donaghy, then 25, was a British
journalist and activist who authored articles critical of the country’s human
rights record. In 2012, he wrote an opinion piece for the Guardian criticizing
the UAE government’s activist crackdown and warning that, if it continued,
“those in power face an uncertain future.”
Before
2012, the former operatives said, the nascent UAE intelligence-gathering
operation largely relied on Emirati agents breaking into the homes of targets
while they were away and physically placing spyware on computers. But as the
Americans built up Raven, the remote hacking of Donaghy offered the contractors
a tantalizing win they could present to the client.
Because
of sensitivity over human rights violations and press freedom in the West, the
operation against a journalist-activist was a gamble. “The potential risk to
the UAE Government and diplomatic relations with Western powers is great if the
operation can be traced back to UAE,” 2012 program documents said.
To
get close to Donaghy, a Raven operative should attempt to “ingratiate himself
to the target by espousing similar beliefs,” the cyber-mercenaries wrote.
Donaghy would be “unable to resist an overture of this nature,” they believed.
Posing
as a single human rights activist, Raven operatives emailed Donaghy asking for
his help to “bring hope to those who are long suffering,” the email message
said.
The
operative convinced Donaghy to download software he claimed would make messages
“difficult to trace.” In reality, the malware allowed the Emiratis to
continuously monitor Donaghy’s email account and Internet browsing. The
surveillance against Donaghy, who was given the codename Gyro, continued under
Stroud and remained a top priority for the Emirates for years, Stroud said.
Donaghy
eventually became aware that his email had been hacked. In 2015, after
receiving another suspicious email, he contacted a security researcher at
Citizen Lab, a Canadian human rights and digital privacy group, who discovered
hackers had been attempting for years to breach his computer.
Reached
by phone in London, Donaghy, now a graduate student pursuing Arab studies,
expressed surprise he was considered a top national security target for five
years. Donaghy confirmed he was targeted using the techniques described in the
documents.
“I’m
glad my partner is sitting here as I talk on the phone because she wouldn’t
believe it,” he said. Told the hackers were American mercenaries working for
the UAE, Donaghy, a British citizen, expressed surprise and disgust. “It feels
like a betrayal of the alliance we have,” he said.
Stroud
said her background as an intelligence operative made her comfortable with
human rights targets as long as they weren’t Americans. “We’re working on
behalf of this country’s government, and they have specific intelligence
objectives which differ from the U.S., and understandably so,” Stroud said.
“You live with it.”
Prominent
Emirati activist Ahmed Mansoor, given the code name Egret, was another target,
former Raven operatives say. For years, Mansoor publicly criticized the
country’s war in Yemen, treatment of migrant workers and detention of political
opponents.
In
September 2013, Raven presented senior NESA officials with material taken from
Mansoor’s computer, boasting of the successful collection of evidence against
him. It contained screenshots of emails in which Mansoor discussed an upcoming
demonstration in front of the UAE’s Federal Supreme Court with family members
of imprisoned dissidents.
Raven
told UAE security forces Mansoor had photographed a prisoner he visited in
jail, against prison policy, “and then attempted to destroy the evidence on his
computer,” said a Powerpoint presentation reviewed by Reuters.
Citizen
Lab published research in 2016 showing that Mansoor and Donaghy were targeted
by hackers — with researchers speculating that the UAE government was the most
likely culprit. Concrete evidence of who was responsible, details on the use of
American operatives, and first-hand accounts from the hacking team are reported
here for the first time.
Mansoor
was convicted in a secret trial in 2017 of damaging the country’s unity and
sentenced to 10 years in jail. He is now held in solitary confinement, his
health declining, a person familiar with the matter said.
Mansoor’s
wife, Nadia, has lived in social isolation in Abu Dhabi. Neighbors are avoiding
her out of fear security forces are watching.
They
are correct. By June 2017 Raven had tapped into her mobile device and given her
the code name Purple Egret, program documents reviewed by Reuters show.
To do
so, Raven utilized a powerful new hacking tool called Karma, which allowed
operatives to break into the iPhones of users around the world.
Karma
allowed Raven to obtain emails, location, text messages and photographs from
iPhones simply by uploading lists of numbers into a preconfigured system, five
former project employees said. Reuters had no contact with Mansoor’s wife.
Karma
was particularly potent because it did not require a target to click on any
link to download malicious software. The operatives understood the hacking tool
to rely on an undisclosed vulnerability in Apple’s iMessage text messaging
software.
In
2016 and 2017, it would be used against hundreds of targets across the Middle
East and Europe, including governments of Qatar, Yemen, Iran and Turkey,
documents show. Raven used Karma to hack an iPhone used by the Emir of Qatar,
Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad al-Thani, as well as the phones of close associates and
his brother. The embassy of Qatar in Washington did not respond to requests for
comment.
WHAT
WASHINGTON KNEW
Former
Raven operatives believed they were on the right side of the law because, they
said, supervisors told them the mission was blessed by the U.S. government.
Although
the NSA wasn’t involved in day-to-day operations, the agency approved of and
was regularly briefed on Raven’s activities, they said Baier told them.
CyberPoint
founder Gumtow said his company was not involved in hacking operations.
“We
were not doing offensive operations. Period,” Gumtow said in a phone interview.
“If someone was doing something rogue, then that’s painful for me to think they
would do that under our banner.”
Instead,
he said, the company trained Emiratis to defend themselves through a program
with the country’s Ministry of Interior.
A
review of internal Raven documents shows Gumtow’s description of the program as
advising the Interior Ministry on cyber defense matches an “unclassified cover
story” Raven operatives were instructed to give when asked about the project.
Raven employees were told to say they worked for the Information Technology and
Interoperability Office, the program document said.
Providing
sensitive defense technologies or services to a foreign government generally
requires special licenses from the U.S. State and Commerce Departments. Both
agencies declined to comment on whether they issued such licenses to CyberPoint
for its operations in the UAE. They added that human rights considerations
figure into any such approvals.
But a
2014 State Department agreement with CyberPoint showed Washington understood
the contractors were helping launch cyber surveillance operations for the UAE.
The approval document explains CyberPoint’s contract is to work alongside NESA
in the “protection of UAE sovereignty” through “collection of information from
communications systems inside and outside the UAE” and “surveillance analysis.”
One
section of the State Department approval states CyberPoint must receive
specific approval from the NSA before giving any presentations pertaining to
“computer network exploitation or attack.” Reuters identified dozens of such
presentations Raven gave to NESA describing attacks against Donaghy, Mansoor
and others. It’s unclear whether the NSA approved Raven’s operations against
specific targets.
The
agreement clearly forbade CyberPoint employees from targeting American citizens
or companies. As part of the agreement, CyberPoint promised that its own staff
and even Emirati personnel supporting the program “will not be used to Exploit
U.S. Persons, (i.e. U.S. citizens, permanent resident aliens, or U.S.
companies.)” Sharing classified U.S. information, controlled military
technology, or the intelligence collection methods of U.S. agencies was also
prohibited.
Gumtow
declined to discuss the specifics of the agreement. “To the best of my ability
and to the best of my knowledge, we did everything as requested when it came to
U.S. rules and regulations,” he said. “And we provided a mechanism for people
to come to me if they thought that something that was done was wrong.”
An
NSA spokesman declined to comment on Project Raven.
A
State Department spokesman declined to comment on the agreement but said such
licenses do not authorize people to engage in human rights abuses.
By
late 2015, some Raven operatives said their missions became more audacious.
For
instance, instead of being asked to hack into individual users of an Islamist
Internet forum, as before, the American contractors were called on to create
computer viruses that would infect every person visiting a flagged site. Such
wholesale collection efforts risked sweeping in the communications of American
citizens, stepping over a line the operators knew well from their NSA days.
U.S.
law generally forbids the NSA, CIA and other U.S. intelligence agencies from
monitoring U.S. citizens.
Working
together with managers, Stroud helped create a policy for what to do when Raven
swept up personal data belonging to Americans. The former NSA employees were
instructed to mark that material for deletion. Other Raven operatives would
also be notified so the American victims could be removed from future
collection.
As
time went on, Stroud noticed American data flagged for removal show up again
and again in Raven’s NESA-controlled data stores.
Still,
she found the work exhilarating. “It was incredible because there weren’t these
limitations like there was at the NSA. There wasn’t that bullshit red tape,”
she said. “I feel like we did a lot of good work on counterterrorism.”
DARKMATTER
AND DEPARTURES
When
Raven was created in 2009, Abu Dhabi had little cyber expertise. The original
idea was for Americans to develop and run the program for five to 10 years
until Emirati intelligence officers were skilled enough to take over, documents
show. By 2013, the American contingent at Raven numbered between a dozen and 20
members at any time, accounting for the majority of the staff.
In
late 2015, the power dynamic at the Villa shifted as the UAE grew more
uncomfortable with a core national security program being controlled by
foreigners, former staff said. Emirati defense officials told Gumtow they
wanted Project Raven to be run through a domestic company, named DarkMatter.
Raven’s
American creators were given two options: Join DarkMatter or go home.
At
least eight operatives left Raven during this transition period. Some said they
left after feeling unsettled about the vague explanations Raven managers
provided when pressed on potential surveillance against other Americans.
DarkMatter
was founded in 2014 by Faisal Al Bannai, who also created Axiom, one of the
largest sellers of mobile devices in the region. DarkMatter markets itself as an
innovative developer of defensive cyber technology. A 2016 Intercept article
reported the company assisted UAE’s security forces in surveillance efforts and
was attempting to recruit foreign cyber experts.
The
Emirati company of more than 650 employees publicly acknowledges its close
business relationship to the UAE government, but denies involvement in
state-backed hacking efforts.
Project
Raven’s true purpose was kept secret from most executives at DarkMatter, former
operatives said.
DarkMatter
did not respond to requests for comment. Al Bannai and the company’s current
chief executive, Karim Sabbagh, did not respond to interview requests. A
spokeswoman for the UAE Ministry of Foreign Affairs declined to comment.
Under
DarkMatter, Project Raven continued to operate in Abu Dhabi from the Villa, but
pressure escalated for the program to become more aggressive.
Before
long, senior NESA officers were given more control over daily functions, former
Raven operatives said, often leaving American managers out of the loop. By
mid-2016, the Emirates had begun making an increasing number of sections of
Raven hidden from the Americans still managing day-to-day operations. Soon, an
“Emirate-eyes only” designation appeared for some hacking targets.
FBI
QUESTIONS
By
2016, FBI agents began approaching DarkMatter employees reentering the United
States to ask about Project Raven, three former operatives said.
The
FBI wanted to know: Had they been asked to spy on Americans? Did classified
information on U.S. intelligence collection techniques and technologies end up
in the hands of the Emiratis?
Two
agents approached Stroud in 2016 at Virginia’s Dulles airport as she was
returning to the UAE after a trip home. Stroud, afraid she might be under
surveillance by the UAE herself, said she brushed off the FBI investigators.
“I’m not telling you guys jack,” she recounted.
Stroud
had been promoted and given even more access to internal Raven databases the
previous year. A lead analyst, her job was to probe the accounts of potential
Raven targets and learn what vulnerabilities could be used to penetrate their
email or messaging systems.
Targets
were listed in various categories, by country. Yemeni targets were in the
“brown category,” for example. Iran was gray.
One
morning in spring 2017, after she finished her own list of targets, Stroud said
she began working on a backlog of other assignments intended for a NESA
officer. She noticed that a passport page of an American was in the system.
When Stroud emailed supervisors to complain, she was told the data had been
collected by mistake and would be deleted, according to an email reviewed by
Reuters.
Concerned,
Stroud began searching a targeting request list usually limited to Raven’s
Emirati staff, which she was still able to access because of her role as lead
analyst. She saw that security forces had sought surveillance against two other
Americans.
When
she questioned the apparent targeting of Americans, she received a rebuke from
an Emirati colleague for accessing the targeting list, the emails show. The
target requests she viewed were to be processed by “certain people. You are not
one of them,” the Emirati officer wrote.
Days
later, Stroud said she came upon three more American names on the hidden
targeting queue.
Those
names were in a category she hadn’t seen before: the “white category” — for
Americans. This time, she said, the occupations were listed: journalist.
“I
was sick to my stomach,” she said. “It kind of hit me at that macro level
realizing there was a whole category for U.S. persons on this program.”
Once
more, she said she turned to manager Baier. He attempted to downplay the
concern and asked her to drop the issue, she said. But he also indicated that
any targeting of Americans was supposed to be done by Raven’s Emirate staff,
said Stroud and two other people familiar with the discussion.
Stroud’s
account of the incidents was confirmed by four other former employees and
emails reviewed by Reuters.
When
Stroud kept raising questions, she said, she was put on leave by superiors, her
phones and passport were taken, and she was escorted from the building. Stroud
said it all happened so quickly she was unable to recall the names of the three
U.S. journalists or other Americans she came across in the files. “I felt like
one of those national security targets,” she said. “I’m stuck in the country,
I’m being surveilled, I can’t leave.”
After
two months, Stroud was allowed to return to America. Soon after, she fished out
the business card of the FBI agents who had confronted her at the airport.
“I
don’t think Americans should be doing this to other Americans,” she told
Reuters. “I’m a spy, I get that. I’m an intelligence officer, but I’m not a bad
one.”
* By
Christopher Bing and Joel Schectman in Washington. Editing by Ronnie Greene,
Jonathan Weber and Michael Williams
*************
Independence is an illusion. Security is iffy. Freedom is all we really have. If we use it irresponsibly, we will not be free of the consequences. And no wall, military, religion, or government in the world will be able to protect our health, lives, homes, nation, prosperity, or our human rights.
