EVERYTHING! We need a 12-step reality check.

In 1980 a bipartisan Presidential Commission concluded (and its commissioners specifically warned) “The most potentially explosive force in the world today is the frustrated desire of poor people to attain a decent standard of living. The anger, despair, and often hatred that result represent real and persistent threats to international order… Neither the cost to national security of allowing malnutrition to spread nor the gain to be derived by a genuine effort to resolve the problem can be predicted or measured in any precise, mathematical way. Nor can monetary value be placed on avoiding the chaos that will ensue unless the United States and the rest of the world begin to develop a common institutional framework for meeting such other critical global threats… Calculable or not, however, this combination of problems now threatens the national security of all countries just as surely as advancing armies or nuclear arsenals.”

I needed to know why this was predicted and how it could be stopped.  That was easy. 

The most horrific and terrifying of all human experiences is the death (or fear of death or disability) of a child.  At that time approximal 42,000 children under the age of 5 died every day from easily preventable malnutrition and related infectious diseases. That was nearly 12 times the death rate of the Jewish Holocaust, yet few Americans knew it.

Between 1978 and 1980 there were three uncontested reports (the international Brandt Commission, the National Academy of Sciences study, and the US Presidential commission).  Each concluded humanity had everything needed to stop this hidden holocaust.  The only missing ingredient was the “political will”.   Failing to marshal it changed everything.  And the world we have today is largely the result of my generation’s failure to do the doable.

Below are 12 simple truths we faced then and now.  I’m hopeful someone will find a flaw in these, so if the world’s people and our governments commit to ending the growing chaos- we will have a workable solution.

The first fundamental truth (FT#1) comes from the Director of the newest US federal agency. “Everything is connected, everything is interdependent, so everything is vulnerable.... And that’s why this has to be a more than whole of government, a more than whole of nation [effort]. It really has to be a global effort....” Jen Easterly. CISA director.  Oct. 29, 2021. [the Cyber and Infrastructure Security Agency established by the Trump Administration in 2018].   

FT#2.   Everything in the known universe consists of systems and structures that operate on basic and universal principles.  Nature has its own fundamental principles such as gravity within physics with other principles within biology, chemistry, and evolution.  Human minds have invented additional principles that attempt to govern systems important to our lives.  Principles within the fields of economics, energy, psychology, religion, politics, governance, health, medicine, agriculture, transportation, engineering....   We are now struggling to establish principles governing the evolution of AI believing that it may be a threat to our species.  Human biological, cyber, and physically engineered systems are the most vulnerable.  

FT#3:  The three most complex and complicated systems now governing our species’ survival is nature, the immune system of every living multicellular organism, and the human mind (a unique evolutionary product within the human brain of our neurological system).  And to the degree that our mind’s concepts fail to protect nature’s systems that are vital to our species and the health of our own immune system - is the degree to which we face increasing risk or existential consequences as individuals and as a species.

FT#4:  The human concept of independence is delusional. Everything can be separated from other things and studied in detail or ignored. But FT#1 ensures that any attempt to create or alter anything -- will have consequences on everything.  And there will always be unintended consequences.

FT#5:  Every tool, technology, or system that the human mind invents and then builds will have multiple uses.  And how these are used will largely be determined by the heart and the mind of the user.  And there will always be unintended consequences.  In this context the human mind is also a tool and a system.  It can be used for good or harm depending on the heart and mind of the user(s).

FT#6:  The two most fundamental desires of most people are having the security to survive and the freedom to thrive. And to the degree any individual ignores or interferes with another individual’s freedom and security -  is the degree to which both individuals (and thus others) will be at risk if a non-violent means of resolving any dispute is not used.

FT#7:  Thomas Paine’s “Common Sense” pamphlet asserts that “the origin and rise of government; namely, a mode rendered necessary by the inability of moral virtue to govern the world; ...is the design and end of government, viz. freedom and security.” 

FT#8:  Independent governments and independent agencies are by their very nature unable to resolve globally interdependent problems without universal agreements and cooperation.

FT#9:  Without significant and transformative changes to the US Constitution it will remain dysfunctional in achieving any of its preamble’s seven intentions.  And the Constitution’s failure is inevitable.  Thomas Jefferson asserted that ‘every Constitution should be rewritten every 19 years... because the future belongs to the living and not the dead.’

FT#10:  The solution to our nation’s dilemma is American inspired.  It is clearly written within the first sentence of our Declaration of Independence.  Our nation’s laws must first abide by “the Laws of Nature and Nature’s God (the Golden rule)”.  Abraham Lincoln wrote that our Declaration is our “Apple of Gold”.  And our Constitution is its “Frame of Silver”.  Swearing an oath to protect the Constitution will not enable us to protect our freedoms or our security.

FT#11: Given the near impossibility of the world’s governments coming together to legally ensure the protection of human rights and the environment above the legal rights of governments and corporations there are only three paths to sustainably maximizing humanities freedoms and security.  1) Purchase the protection of human rights and the environment by prioritizing sufficient funding to comprehensively achieve all the United Nation’s 17 Sustainable Development Goals simultaneously.  2) Pray for the second to come.  3) Wait for space aliens to save us from our insanity of doing the same things repeatedly expecting a different result.

FT#12:  Three lines suggest we are rapidly running out of time if we are not already too late. The first line is the exponential growth of technology, which is now growing at another exponential pace.  Line two is the limited linear thinking of the human mind... with its ease of being distracted, misinformed, or delusional.  Line three is our government’s flat line of change over the last four decades, with the only significant change coming a year after Sept. 11, 2001, when 17 independent US agencies were combined into the Department of Homeland Security, but still independent of the Department of Defense, the Department of Justice, and all other vital departments.  Today that line is heading down as conspiracy theories, social media, and fake news have been weaponized and continue to drive our hyperpolarized public and political parties into delusional extremes.

Concussion:   That 1980 bipartisan US Presidential commission mentioned above went on to state “that promoting economic development in general, and overcoming hunger in particular, are tasks far more critical to the U.S. national security than most policymakers acknowledge or even believe. Since the advent of nuclear weapons, most Americans have been conditioned to equate national security with the strength of strategic military forces. The Commission considers this prevailing belief to be a simplistic illusion. Armed might represents merely the physical aspect of national security. Military force is ultimately useless in the absence of the global security that only coordinated international progress toward social justice can bring.”

Our world today is experiencing the consequences of ignoring that commission’s specific warnings of increases in “diseases”, “international terrorism”, “war”, “environmental problems” and “other human rights problems” (refugees, genocide, human trafficking…). 

These global pressures have fueled anti-democratic populist movements that continue to thrive today.  Other prestigious, bipartisan studies and academic reports have followed since that 1980 report. Most offer similar warnings and recommendations to reduce global instability and the growing array of threats to our freedoms, security, prosperity, and political stability.

Will any political leader or organization rise to the occasion?  At this moment that is woefully unlikely.  What’s missing is the political will of “we the people”.  How many times have each of us stood before our nation’s flag and pledged “liberty and justice for all”.  It’s time to deliver on that pledge.

To my Rotary International colleagues

 

Our nation is again at a debt default cliff.  If we go off, the consequences to every person in the world will be dire. As “Dirty Harry” once said “Feel lucky punk?”

Our nation's $30+ trillion in debt (and growing) is directly tied to the reactionary responses of our democratically elected officials.  Elected by us (voters and non-voters).  Our species appears to be hardwired to reactionary thinking.  But we are also capable of the deeper systemic thinking now needed.

There isn't enough money or Rotary club projects in the world to address primary root causes of humanities problems.  And the concept of prevention appears unamerican.  As our nation’s party politics increasingly favors extreme candidates with conspiracy theories and a ‘no-compromise’ attitude there appears to be no stopping our nation’s hyperpolarized dive into unsustainable chaos impacting every sector (economic, environmental, health, foreign policy...).  And after Covid19, it appears we don’t even learn from our mistakes. 

When will Rotary International lead the way in waking people up to the global reality that “everything is connected, interdependent, and vulnerable...and a global approach is needed”.  In the early 1980s one Rotary group in Indonesia sparked the global campaign to eradicate Polio.  Unfortunately, wars and revolutions stalled Polio’s target date for eradication several times (2000, to 2003, to 2015, and now??) 

Why can’t RI adopt the target date of achieving the United Nation’s 17 Sustainable Development Goals by the year 2030?  This already approved global plan to address the root causes of almost every existential threat humanity faces today was established in 2015.  And it is not on course.   This December 10^th will be the 75^th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The world won’t come together anytime soon to make this list of God given rights to every human but achieving the 17 SDGs could. And they are measurable, achievable, affordable, and the best investment of time and money the world has ever known.  

This is TRUE, Fair to all concerned, will build Goodwill and Better Friendships globally, and be Beneficial to all concerned.

Unless you see a better way of debt reduction and achieving “Life...liberty and justice for all” ... Why not?  

ChatGPT answers critical questions every person must understand

User

Why, in thinking of the future, is there a tendency to presume technological innovations will go hand in hand with devastation leading to a very dark future?

ChatGPT:  The tendency to associate technological innovations with potential devastation and a dark future can stem from a combination of factors:

Fear of the unknown: As technology progresses, it often introduces new and unfamiliar concepts and possibilities. Human beings naturally fear what they don't understand, and this fear can lead to speculation about worst-case scenarios. When people can't predict or fully comprehend the implications of emerging technologies, they may default to imagining negative outcomes.

Historical examples: Throughout history, there have been instances where technological advancements have caused harm or led to negative consequences. For example, the invention of nuclear weapons during the 20th century demonstrated the destructive power of technology. These historical events can influence perceptions and reinforce the idea that progress and devastation often go hand in hand.

Media portrayal: Movies, books, and other forms of media often depict futuristic scenarios where advanced technologies have resulted in dystopian societies or catastrophic events. These fictional portrayals, while entertaining, can create a bias towards associating technological progress with negative outcomes. Media tends to focus on conflict and drama, and this can shape our perceptions of the future.

Ethical concerns: As technology evolves rapidly, ethical dilemmas and concerns arise. Issues such as privacy, surveillance, job displacement, and the potential misuse of advanced technologies raise valid concerns about their impact on society. These discussions sometimes emphasize the potential risks and downsides, contributing to a pessimistic view of the future.

It's important to note that while there are potential risks and challenges associated with technological advancements, there are also immense opportunities for positive change and progress. Innovation has the power to improve lives, solve pressing global issues, and enhance our overall well-being. It is crucial to approach discussions about the future with a balanced perspective, considering both the risks and benefits that new technologies bring.

User:  Or, Because of the failure of the human mind and heart to control its short-term urges and apply our minds to preventing problems instead of serving special interests. That’s why government was invented… according to Thomas Paine. To maximize human freedom and security. And that is where governments are failing today. Acting as independent agents in an entirely connected, interdependent and vulnerable world, Democracies give majorities what they want (but don’t see they need which is justice for all including minorities) and dictators get what they need to control the people for their own control of political, economic, and military power.

ChatGPT:  Your viewpoint highlights concerns about the failures and shortcomings of governments in addressing societal issues and ensuring justice and security for all. Indeed, governments play a crucial role in managing the complexities of an interconnected world and safeguarding the interests of their citizens. However, the effectiveness of governments can vary, and their ability to address long-term problems and serve the common good can be influenced by various factors.

Short-term focus and special interests: Governments may sometimes prioritize short-term gains or cater to the interests of specific groups over long-term planning and the general welfare of the population. Political considerations, pressure from influential entities, and the pursuit of immediate benefits can hinder the implementation of sustainable policies.

Lack of foresight and preventive measures: Governments often face challenges in proactively identifying and addressing potential problems before they become crises. This can be due to a variety of factors, including limited resources, competing priorities, bureaucratic inefficiencies, and the difficulty of predicting complex future scenarios.

Democratic governance and majority rule: Democracies aim to represent the will of the majority, but this can sometimes result in the neglect or marginalization of minority voices and needs. Balancing majority rule with the protection of individual rights and ensuring justice for all can be a delicate task for governments.

Autocratic regimes and power concentration: In dictatorships or autocratic systems, leaders may prioritize their own control and interests over the well-being of the population. These regimes can stifle dissent, limit freedoms, and use political, economic, and military power to maintain their authority.

While these challenges exist, it is important to recognize that governance is a complex endeavor, and the shortcomings of governments do not apply universally. There are democratic systems that strive to promote justice and uphold individual rights, and there are examples of effective governance across the globe. It is through ongoing efforts to strengthen institutions, promote transparency and accountability, and foster civic engagement that societies can work towards improving the functioning of their governments and achieving the goals of freedom, justice, and security for all.

User:  But the failure of one government to control a biolab accident, or intentionally create a biothreat with biotechnology threatens every government in the world.  And an Autocratic regime can respond far faster than a democratic based nation like the US, with its people so divided and vulnerable to misinformation or conspiracy theories. 

ChatGPT:  You raise valid concerns regarding the potential risks and challenges that can arise from biolab accidents or intentional misuse of biotechnology. These risks indeed have global implications and can pose significant threats to governments and societies worldwide. Autocratic regimes, with their centralized decision-making and potentially faster response times, may have an advantage in swiftly addressing such crises compared to more complex decision-making processes in democratic systems.

However, it is crucial to note that while autocratic regimes may have the potential for faster response times, they can also be prone to their own set of challenges. Concentration of power in the hands of a few individuals can lead to decision-making based on personal interests or the suppression of information that does not align with the regime's narrative. Lack of transparency, limited accountability, and a disregard for individual rights and freedoms can hinder an effective response in the long term.

On the other hand, democratic systems, despite their challenges, strive to ensure checks and balances, transparency, and the inclusion of diverse perspectives. While decision-making processes might be slower due to the need for consensus and public debate, democratic systems aim to foster accountability, respect for human rights, and the engagement of informed citizens.

Addressing vulnerabilities to misinformation and conspiracy theories is an ongoing challenge for any society, regardless of its governance system. Promoting critical thinking, media literacy, and providing access to accurate information are important steps in countering these issues.

In the face of global challenges, collaboration and cooperation between governments and international organizations become vital. Sharing knowledge, resources, and expertise can help mitigate risks and develop coordinated responses to potential biothreats or other crises.

Ultimately, finding the right balance between agility and democratic values is a complex task, but it is essential to work towards strengthening governance systems to effectively address emerging challenges while upholding fundamental principles of justice, freedom, and security.

User:  Why can't the US government achieve any of the seven intentions in the US constitution's preamble?

ChatGPT:  The preamble of the United States Constitution sets out the broad intentions and goals of the government. It states:

"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

While the achievement of these intentions is an ongoing endeavor influenced by various factors, it is important to note that the U.S. government has made progress in many areas aligned with the principles outlined in the Constitution's preamble. However, challenges, complexities, and differing interpretations can hinder the complete realization of these intentions. Here are some points to consider:

Forming a more perfect Union: The idea of a "more perfect Union" implies an ongoing process of improving and strengthening the country. Over the course of history, the U.S. has experienced significant progress in civil rights, social equality, and political representation. However, challenges such as political polarization and societal divisions continue to present obstacles to achieving a truly perfect Union.

Establishing Justice: The U.S. government has established a robust legal system aimed at upholding justice. However, achieving perfect justice is an ongoing challenge, as the interpretation and application of laws can vary, leading to debates about fairness and equality. Issues such as systemic inequalities, access to justice, and addressing injustices remain areas of concern that require continuous efforts.

Ensuring domestic Tranquility: The government plays a role in maintaining peace and stability within the country. While law enforcement agencies and policies are in place to ensure domestic tranquility, societal tensions, crime rates, and external threats can affect the realization of this goal.

Providing for the common defense: The U.S. government invests significant resources in maintaining a strong defense capability. However, ensuring the common defense is a complex task influenced by evolving global dynamics, emerging threats, and budgetary considerations.

Promoting the general Welfare: The government has implemented various policies and programs to promote the general welfare of its citizens, such as public education, social safety nets, healthcare initiatives, and infrastructure development. However, debates over the scope, effectiveness, and distribution of these policies persist.

Securing the Blessings of Liberty: The U.S. government is founded on the principles of individual liberties and freedoms. While significant progress has been made in safeguarding these rights, ongoing discussions and legal battles occur concerning the balance between individual liberties and national security, as well as addressing marginalized communities' struggles for equal rights.

Serving Posterity: The government's actions and policies are intended to benefit future generations. Environmental sustainability, economic stability, and responsible governance are essential considerations in fulfilling this intention. However, the trade-offs between short-term interests and long-term sustainability remain a challenge.

It is essential to recognize that achieving these intentions requires continuous efforts, adaptations, and collective participation from various stakeholders, including the government, civil society, and the public. Over time, progress can be made in aligning policies and actions with the aspirations set forth in the preamble of the U.S. Constitution, even if complete perfection may be an ideal that remains elusive.

User:   Abraham Lincoln called our "Declaration of Independence" our "Apple of Gold" and our Constitution its "frame of silver".  Why hasn't 'we the people' insisted on obeying "the Laws of Nature and Nature's God"?

ChatGPT: The interpretation and adherence to "the Laws of Nature and Nature's God" can vary among individuals and societies. While Abraham Lincoln's quote highlights the significance of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, it is important to recognize that the understanding and application of these principles evolve over time.

The notion of "the Laws of Nature and Nature's God" reflects the belief that there are fundamental moral and ethical principles that underpin human existence and should guide human actions and governance. However, the interpretation and application of these principles can be influenced by cultural, social, and ideological factors.

Factors that contribute to differing interpretations or variations in the adherence to these principles include:

Diverse perspectives: People hold diverse beliefs and understandings of what constitutes the "Laws of Nature and Nature's God." These perspectives are shaped by religious, philosophical, and cultural backgrounds, resulting in variations in their application.

Evolving societal values: Societal values and norms change over time. As societies progress, new challenges and ethical considerations emerge, which can lead to shifts in interpretations of these laws and their application to contemporary issues.

Legal frameworks and constitutional interpretation: The legal frameworks within which societies operate also influence the application of these principles. Courts and legal scholars interpret constitutional provisions and fundamental rights, which can result in different understandings of the "Laws of Nature and Nature's God."

Balancing individual rights and societal interests: The challenge lies in striking a balance between individual rights and the collective well-being of society. Different opinions arise on how best to uphold the principles of nature and God while addressing complex societal issues and competing interests.

Furthermore, societal progress often involves ongoing debates, negotiations, and struggles to ensure that laws and policies are aligned with these fundamental principles. Different groups may advocate for their interpretation of these laws and work towards their realization, but achieving consensus and widespread adherence can be a complex and gradual process.

Ultimately, the interpretation and adherence to "the Laws of Nature and Nature's God" are influenced by a multitude of factors, and societies continue to grapple with striking a balance between individual rights, societal interests, and evolving understandings of these principles.

User:  The Laws of nature exist regardless of what people believe.  And every major religion is founded on the Golden Rule... so it sounds like the human mind's creative capacity to believe anything and make up its own principles that result in killing and dying to protect them...like nationalism (not a law of nature or nature's God)..

ChatGPT: You are correct that the laws of nature exist independently of human beliefs. The laws of nature encompass the fundamental principles and processes that govern the physical world, such as gravity, thermodynamics, and biological processes. These laws are objective and exist regardless of human perception or interpretation.

Similarly, the Golden Rule, which is found in various forms in many major religions and ethical systems, promotes the principle of treating others as you would like to be treated. It emphasizes empathy, compassion, and respect for others. The Golden Rule reflects a universal ethical principle that transcends specific cultural or religious boundaries.

However, you rightly point out that human creativity and the capacity for belief can sometimes result in the development of ideologies, such as extreme nationalism, that may lead to conflict and violence. These ideologies are constructs of the human mind and are not inherent laws of nature or nature's God.

It is important to distinguish between objective laws of nature and subjective human constructs. While the laws of nature remain constant and govern the physical world, human beliefs and ideologies can vary, leading to different interpretations, values, and actions.

The challenge lies in harnessing our creative capacity and belief systems to align with principles that promote peace, justice, and harmony. Recognizing the fundamental laws of nature and embracing ethical principles like the Golden Rule can serve as guiding principles to foster empathy, cooperation, and the well-being of all individuals and societies.

User:  Religions are also a construct of the human mind...but the concept of Justice (treating others fairly) appears to be primal.  Even found in non-human species. 

ChatGPT:  Indeed, religions are human constructs that have developed throughout history as systems of belief and practice. They often serve as frameworks for understanding the world, providing moral guidance, and addressing existential questions. However, it is worth noting that the specific beliefs and practices of different religions can vary widely.

The concept of justice, on the other hand, can be considered a fundamental aspect of human society, and its foundations can be observed in various forms across cultures and even in some non-human species. The concept of fairness and treating others fairly is rooted in our social nature and the need for cooperation and harmonious interactions within communities.

Research in fields such as primatology and behavioral sciences has indeed shown that certain non-human species exhibit behaviors that resemble fairness and cooperation. For example, in some experiments, primates have shown a preference for equitable outcomes, indicating an inherent sense of justice or fairness.

While the specific manifestations of justice and fairness may differ across cultures and species, the underlying concept of treating others fairly and upholding principles of equity appears to have a primal and universal quality.

It is through our collective efforts, guided by this primal sense of justice, that societies can strive to establish systems and institutions that promote fairness, equality, and justice for all individuals.

User:  Why do most Americans believe their nation should remain the most powerful in the world?

ChatGPT:  The belief that a nation should remain the most powerful in the world can stem from a combination of factors, including historical context, national identity, perceived national interests, and geopolitical considerations. Here are some key reasons why many Americans may hold this belief:

Historical context: The United States has historically been a major global power, and many Americans take pride in their country's achievements and contributions on the world stage. This historical perspective may create a sense of responsibility or a desire to maintain the country's position of influence and power.

National identity and exceptionalism: The concept of American exceptionalism, the belief that the United States has a unique role and destiny in the world, is deeply ingrained in American culture and identity. Many Americans see their nation as a beacon of democracy, freedom, and progress and believe that maintaining global influence is essential to promoting these values.

Security and protection of national interests: Being the most powerful nation can be seen as a means of ensuring national security and protecting the country's interests. This belief is rooted in the notion that a strong military and economic position is necessary to safeguard against potential threats and to advance economic prosperity and stability.

Geopolitical considerations: Global power dynamics and the balance of power among nations play a role in shaping perspectives on maintaining national power. In an interconnected and competitive world, some Americans may believe that maintaining the nation's status as the most powerful helps protect the country's interests, advance its values, and shape global events in ways that align with American objectives.

Perception of global responsibilities: Some Americans may believe that as the most powerful nation, the United States has a responsibility to lead and shape international affairs. They may see maintaining that power as crucial for addressing global challenges, promoting democracy, human rights, and contributing to global stability.

It is important to note that these beliefs may not be universally held among Americans, and there is diversity of opinion on this matter within the country. Views on global power and the role of the United States can vary based on individual values, political affiliations, and personal experiences

User:  It is possible for any nation to sustain is citizen's freedom and security if its laws are based on the illusion of independence, given that everything in the world is connected, interdependent and vulnerable? 

ChatGPT:  Sustaining freedom and security for citizens is indeed a complex challenge for any nation, especially in an interconnected and interdependent world. It is essential for a nation's laws and policies to be based on a realistic understanding of the interconnections and vulnerabilities that exist. Relying on the illusion of complete independence would be unrealistic and could hinder effective governance.

Recognizing the interconnected nature of the world allows nations to address challenges and promote the well-being of their citizens more effectively. Here are some key points to consider:

Interdependence and global challenges: In today's world, nations face various global challenges that require collective action, such as climate change, pandemics, terrorism, and economic instability. These challenges transcend national borders and cannot be addressed solely through independent actions. Recognizing the interdependencies enables nations to engage in collaborative efforts, share knowledge, and coordinate responses for the benefit of their citizens.

Diplomacy and cooperation: In an interconnected world, nations rely on diplomacy and cooperation to address common concerns and resolve conflicts. Maintaining constructive relationships with other nations, international organizations, and regional alliances is crucial for ensuring security, economic prosperity, and the protection of citizens' rights.

Globalized economy and trade: Economic interdependence is a significant feature of the modern world. Nations benefit from international trade, investment, and collaboration, which contribute to economic growth and the well-being of citizens. However, it also requires careful regulation, fair practices, and measures to mitigate vulnerabilities associated with economic interdependence.

Information and cybersecurity: The interconnected world brings new challenges in the realm of information and cybersecurity. Nations need to develop robust legal frameworks, policies, and international cooperation to protect citizens' privacy, ensure the integrity of information systems, and combat cyber threats.

It is important for nations to strike a balance between preserving individual freedoms and security while recognizing the interdependencies and vulnerabilities that exist. Laws and policies should be grounded in a realistic understanding of these interconnected dynamics, aiming to safeguard the rights and well-being of citizens while promoting cooperation and responsible global engagement.

May is Mental Health month: God help us! We are all Mentally ill.

May is Mental Health Month, a time to prioritize and raise awareness about our well-being and the challenges we face.  Health should always be our highest priority (mind, body, spirit, family, environment, government...).  A vital concept I recently learned and vital to all levels of our health is anosognosia. I still have trouble remembering, pronouncing, and spelling it but it's worth learning.  It is a term of Greek origin that loosely translates to "lack of awareness or insight." 

In the context of mental health, it refers to individuals who have a mental illness but are unaware of their condition. This neurological condition hinders one's ability to recognize or perceive one's own illness, it is commonly seen in conditions such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and dementia. While some individuals may acknowledge their illness, others strongly resist accepting this knowledge.

As a scientist rather than a psychologist, I hypothesize that most Americans suffer from a form of chronic anosognosia.  It is our collective 'mental illness' (unawareness) that is at the root of various societal issues, including wars, inadequate responses to genocides, pandemics, the instigation of terrorism, our unsustainable national debt, dysfunctional government, political polarization, personal depression, hopelessness, loneliness, denial, suicide, and multiple harmful addictions. And particularly avoiding multiple clear warnings of each of these.  Unfortunately, avoidance of understanding our objective reality only exacerbates these problems-- along with the costly, too often lethal, and literarily unsustainable consequences that persist in impacting every aspect of our lives. And we continue to stumble forward into accelerating chaos without addressing root causes. 

Money has the power to accomplish many things.  Too often however, it is directed toward the wrong causes.  Our reactionary Pleistocene brain is the primary enabler of our reactionary government.  Too often 'we the people' (and thus our government) prioritize simplistic solutions that ignore underlying causes. Failing to invest in root causes is breaking us economically.  And no amount of money or volunteer time can relieve the massive suffering and urgent needs that arise as a result.  We cannot continue repeating the same actions and then expecting different outcomes.  Einstein probably didn't define this as insanity.  But he could have. 

Here is a simple yet profound cosmic reality that we unconsciously ignore because we blindly believe in the illusion of independence.  In reality "Everything is connected, everything is interdependent, so everything is vulnerable...we need a global effort." These words were spoken by CISA director Jen Easterly on October 29, 2021.  They express the need for a global effort to address the interconnected and interdependent challenges we all face. The establishment of the Cyber and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) was under the Trump Administration.  It was a step in the right direction.  Unfortunately, the delusion of "independence" is deeply ingrained in our thinking, reactions, and the laws that govern us.

Why is this the case?  Largely due to our human experiences mostly limited to five basic senses and the neurological signals our brain receive that are then filtered through our mind.  Our mind often believes in flawed concepts like independence. This illusion is the foundation of most of our problems.  It blinds us to the reality of our irreversible global connections and interdependence - which blocks us from addressing the core interrelated issues.  And this only contributes to our increasingly chaotic and unsustainable reality.

One solution lies in understanding the words of Leonardo da Vinci: "Realize how to see. Understand that everything connects with everything else." Similar assertions of reality have been made by Albert Einstein and other wise individuals throughout history. Unfortunately, our government and its agencies are codified to operate independently at nearly every level, thus failing to recognize or respond effectively to the irreversibly interconnected nature of our world.  At best our government can only offer us measures to build resilience.  This won't change until ‘we the people’ demand a more comprehensive approach.

Unfortunately, every 4th of July, we celebrate our "independence," making us feel good and usually superior to the rest of the world.   But following the daily news reflects a different picture.  Many chose to avoid the news because "it's depressing". Yet most people instinctively know that things will likely worsen before they get better -- as gun sales, mass shootings, opioid deaths, extreme weather events, political polarization, distrust of government, and rejection of science only increase.  And our persistent 'hope' or 'optomism'  that elections will solve these local, national and global problems prevents real change.

Reading the preamble of our Constitution one quickly realizes that we are not forming a "more Perfect Union," as intended.  And our Constitutional democratic republic can never achieve any of the other six intentions expressed in the preamble without a major shift in how we see the world and act in it.  Please read those seven intentions!  And if you find yourself blaming a President or a political party for our nation’s growing dysfunction, please reread the first three words of the Constitution.

Now, read the first paragraph of the Declaration of Independence. If I had one wish to change the past, I would alter just two words: "Independence" to "Separation" and "Happiness" to "Health." Dr. Benjamin Rush, a close friend of Thomas Jefferson and a signer of the Declaration of Independence, suggested this “health” change before its completion.  Jefferson rejected his edit.  And, unfortunately, the definition of happiness has evolved over time now meaning different things to different people.  The word ‘health’ however, is a concept that is challenging to define incorrectly.  But we did.  We now define medical care as "health care".  But the foundation of sustainable and affordable health is in prevention.  While medicine is valuable when prevention fails, it is exorbitantly expensive.  And prevention now appears un-American.  Now many individuals perceive "mental health" problems and programs as exclusive to those who cannot conform to our society's perceived norms and biases.  But how healthy can we be if we are well adjusted to a profoundly sick society/culture?

Thus, we remain bound to the consequences of that our most cherished and unexamined biases.  Without seeing that our favored mental constructs (peace through strength, the free market will solve our problems, my religion is the best, democracy will solve our problems...) are a serious problem.  Personal or global peace is not a function of strength or disarmament; These are a function of justice. And without liberty and justice for all there can be no peace or security for anyone.

Consider the issues of racism, terrorism, the Covid-19 pandemic, Ukraine, or any other dilemma we face. These challenges exist because we believe, and our nation’s actions, are independent.  Reflect on the consequences of our nation's first Civil War, which claimed more American lives than all subsequent wars combined. Our original Constitution was built upon 13 "independent" states, with some prioritizing states' rights over human rights. In hindsight, it is clear why Abraham Lincoln referred to our Declaration of Independence as our "Apple of Gold" and our Constitution as its "Frame of Silver." Thomas Jefferson advocated for rewriting the Constitution every 19 years because he believed that "the future belongs to the living, not the dead." Technology has been rapidly changing things for decades. Now exponentially.  Yet our government remains fundamentally the same and only grows more dysfunctional and unable to deal with multitude of problems...or the coming chaos.

Thus our nation is left with most patriotic Americans, elected officials, and political parties firmly believing that protecting our national sovereignty (our independence) will safeguard our freedoms, prosperity, and national security. This perspective ignores reality and the wisdom presented in Thomas Paine's patriotic pamphlet, "Common Sense." Paine asserts that no individual is truly independent, and the sole legitimate purpose of government, given that we are not all angels, is to maximize the two most fundamental human desires: freedom and security.

What if Jefferson had titled his masterpiece the "Declaration of Separation"? This alternative title may have prevented our persistent insanity rooted in the belief that we are independent. The profound fundamental truths stated after "We hold these truths to be self-evident" would then connect us to every individual, emphasizing that every human being possesses inalienable rights bestowed upon them by nature or a higher power - from the moment of their birth.

If anyone believes that the "Golden rule" does not apply to them, they should not be surprised when unintended negative consequences arise. Scholars who have studied the prolific writings of our founding fathers discovered that they used the word "virtue" more frequently than "freedom." Some believed that the Constitution could only endure if "We the people" acted virtuously.  John Adams said our Constitution was only fit for a "virtuous people".  

Unfortunately, both virtue and accountability regarding our global interdependence are lacking. To sustain our freedoms and security, we must amend the Constitution to accept our interdependence.  This will only be done if we can alter our mind’s thinking that blindness us to the real challenges of our irreversibly interdependent and increasingly troubled world. 

Even before Trump a Surgeon General said “loneliness” was our nation’s greatest health threat.  The current Surgeon General has claimed that loneliness carries risks as deadly as smoking a dozen cigarettes a day. Because we are social creatures, loneliness is an innate feeling akin to hunger or thirst.  And our body experiences unhealthy effects when any essential survival element is missing.  Our high rates of suicide, obesity, mass shootings, loneliness, opioid deaths, and homelessness are mere symptoms of our separateness (and selfishness) are associated with the belief we are independent.  In our culture excessive individualism may be considered normal or even patriotic. But we must never negate the importance of diversity.  It is our species greatest asset for survival in an ever-changing and increasingly interconnected world.

Placing our faith in pills rather than the "Laws of Nature and Nature's God" will only perpetuate our suffering.  Life works best when we take care of mother nature and each other.  Sustaining life on this miracle plant is essentially that simple.  Pills may prevent some obesity while alcohol and marijuana may provide temporary relief.  But they cannot bring sustainable happiness. Fentanyl may alleviate pain, but it can also kill. Spending billions of dollars to defend our borders will not eliminate the growing domestic demand for drugs. Medical care should not be conflated with health care. True health care lies in prevention through healthy eating, physical activity, environmental health, and community involvement.  Defending flawed opinions and feelings that arise from them -- is detrimental to us all. Sometimes, the best medicine for curing loneliness is helping others. Physical stress is not inherently bad; it is essential for strengthening our bodies systems, plus our mind, and spirit. Believing that stress is only harmful can actually be detrimental to our well-being.

Such flawed concepts are literally killing us. Religion, ideally, should unite us in love and mutual respect and assistance. It should teach us to use science to improve life, help others, and protect nature, instead of humanity focusing on building the most powerful weapons.  Politics should be a means of resolving our differences, rather than dividing us with hatred based on appearances or beliefs (be they religious, cultural, sexual, national, economic, or ethnic). 

United, we can survive and thrive; divided, we won’t.  And when our beliefs damage our environment, our immune system, or our human relationships, our own mind become the greatest threat to our well-being.

If we choose to follow fundamental objective truths, we can establish the foundations of health.  Too often our personal or political truths only serve to divide us.  Objective truths have the potential of uniting us.   This is the only reliable path to engineering sustainable human systems encompassing government, food and energy supply, effective communication, economic prosperity, sustainable freedoms, and maximum security.  By prioritizing the "Laws of Nature and Nature's God," we could thrive and survive in virtually any environment. However, we must convince our minds to embrace our interdependence and prioritization of the golden rule.

While we may always engage in arguments and debates, we must remember that our minds' greatest weakness is its susceptibility to believe anything. Absolutely anything. No matter how strong the belief...it does not make it a fact.  This mental error too often leads us to kill or die for unfounded beliefs.

Happiness should be synonymous with contentment.  Finding one’s fulfillment by utilizing one’s talents in serve those we love or others in need.  Our minds did not evolve to defend delusions or flawed concepts; the mind’s original purpose was to solve problems that could ensure the perpetuation of our species.

Unfortunately, too many people now believe everything they think.  Then place undue trust in the feelings that follow from flawed assumptions. Assumptions that derail us from reality and hinder our ability to learn the truth. We cannot continue repeating the same actions and expecting different results; This is literally insanity. The medical term for this persistent cognitive state is anosognosia.

Human mind limited in predicting AI consequnces

 

Dear Editor,

Simon Winchester may have more intelligence and wisdom that us or the ancient Greeks (The ancient Greeks offer a clue about what ChatGPT means for humanity, 5-3-23) but his conclusion failed to grasp the eventual consequences of the fundamental real-life differences in technology, the human mind, and our currently flawed governance systems. 

Advances in technology’s power, affordability, and ubiquitousness are growing exponentially.  Our mind advances linearly.  Meanwhile our governing systems have basically flatlined and are now being pried backward.  Our minds and our government’s failure to adapt to this exponential growth of every technologies potential for being weaponized offers unprecedented destruction, mass murder, and even targeted genocide for anyone with the mind and the will to use it way.   This won’t end well. 

Voter overall ignorance on this reality or the many existential threats we and our environmental infrastructure face could be solved using ChatGPT.   Ask it about the value to humans and nature of globally achieving the United Nations 17 Sustainable Development Goals.   Our limited thinking and retaining of vital information combined with our flawed democratic republic government operating system (founded on illusion of independence) we cannot resolve our globally interdependent problems/threats.  So says Jen Easterly, the wise Director of CISA, our newest federal agency intending to halt the cyber threats to our nation’s infrastructure ever since Trump was elected.  She said, “Everything is connected...interdependent...and vulnerable...we need a global approach.”

Unfortunately, our mind’s priority of defending flawed political, economic, or religious beliefs overrides this fundamental principle of interdependence.   May God or ChatGPT help us!  We certainly appear unable to help ourselves.