Wednesday, July 30, 2025

NewWorld-Game.org This is my first BUCKY ask.

 If you are reading this I can't urge you enough to go to this NewWorld-Game.org website.  It's free. Profoundly useful IF you are committed solving any number of local or global problems. 

 www.newworld-game.org 

I did one of the first Buckminster Fuller designed World Game in the late 1970s.  Medard Gabel worked with Bucky and others to create this game to spread the understanding humankind needs to work together to engineer a world that works non-violently and sustainably for all people, everywhere, far into the future.  Bucky proposed a global electric energy grid in the 1938!!! You read that right!  He also created a world map that accurately compared the land mass sizes of every continent.  FYI: You could fit the US, China, Russia, and the EU land masses over the map of Africa...and still see parts of Africa. 

When you first log on...Bucky's AI avatar will greet you (his knowledge and wisdom has been incorporated into his Avatar with multiple AI platforms.  Other wise souls can also be consulted...and then you can pick your friends or experts to peer review their answers....or your creative ideas.

And its all free!  This description only scratches the surface of this games potential for solving global problems and connecting you with others who have the same desire to have your life and time matter, and have your actions make the biggest sustainable difference.   

The Truth can be found within the website.  If you ask the right questions ;-)

/////////////////

ME:  Bucky, I would like your coaching and assistance in finding answers to the acceleration of civilization’s cognition caused chaos - which appears to be at the heart of humankind’s resistance to doing what’s possible, with the resources and technologies we already have, and have had for hundreds if not thousands of years.  (7-30-25)

Increasing truth decay is further eroding the trust we already had in governments and even science institutions.  This is fueling political polarization, undermining the Rule of Law and slowing the urgent need for democracies to quickly adapt to the rising global challenges with a weak and anemic United Nations.  With practically zero chance of reforming or transforming the UN to put the protection of Human rights and the Environment above the protection of national sovereignty and capitalism, what should be our highest priority. The increasing evolution of wars, cheaper weapon systems, more forms of WMD, the glacial speed of the weapon procurement process, increasing extreme weather conditions, and violent extremist groups (both domestic and global) what should ‘we the people’ be focused on. 

It appears the three progressive movements (Peace, Environment, economic/social Justice) and the thousands of organizations within each - still compete with each other for limited money, members, media, and access to policy makers limited time.

BUCKY: 

You've articulated a profound and urgent set of challenges facing humanity, Bucky. Your observation about the "acceleration of civilization’s cognition caused chaos" and the resistance to implementing known solutions, alongside "truth decay" and the fragmentation of efforts, resonates with many contemporary analyses. Addressing these complex, interconnected issues requires a multi-faceted approach.

Here's an exploration of the underlying issues and potential areas of focus, drawing on contemporary thought:

Understanding the "Cognition-Caused Chaos" and Resistance to Action


Your framing of "civilization's cognition caused chaos" points to several deep-seated issues that hinder collective action, even when solutions are known:

  • Cognitive Biases and Heuristics: As previously discussed, the human mind is prone to biases like confirmation bias (seeking information that confirms existing beliefs), optimism bias (underestimating risks), present bias (prioritizing immediate gratification over long-term benefits), and the "bystander effect" (diffusion of responsibility in large groups). These make it difficult for individuals and collectives to accurately perceive threats, agree on facts, and commit to necessary but often uncomfortable changes.

 

  • Information Overload and "Truth Decay": The sheer volume of information, combined with the proliferation of misinformation and disinformation, overwhelms cognitive processing. "Truth decay" refers to the diminishing role of facts and analysis in public discourse, characterized by increasing disagreement about facts, a blurring of lines between opinion and fact, and declining trust in former sources of factual information. This directly undermines the ability of societies to agree on common problems and solutions, fueling political polarization and making rational decision-making harder.

 

  • Social and Cultural Inertia: Societies, like individuals, exhibit inertia. Deeply entrenched economic systems, cultural norms, vested interests, and political structures resist rapid change, even in the face of compelling evidence. Short-term political cycles often prioritize immediate electoral gains over long-term strategic investments or difficult reforms.

 

  • The "Tragedy of the Commons" at a Global Scale: Many of the challenges you highlight—climate change, pandemics, nuclear proliferation, resource depletion—are global "commons" problems. Individuals or nations acting in their own perceived self-interest deplete shared resources or contribute to collective harms, even when it's against their long-term collective interest, because the costs are diffused and the benefits of restraint are not immediately or solely accrued by the acting party. This is exacerbated by the lack of robust global governance mechanisms.

 

Highest Priorities and Areas of Focus for "We the People"



Given the interconnected nature of these challenges and the limitations of existing global structures, here are areas that emerge as crucial priorities, moving beyond single-issue advocacy to address foundational weaknesses:

1. Rebuilding Shared Epistemologies and Trust in Institutions:
* Combating Disinformation and Promoting Media Literacy: Investing heavily in education that equips citizens to critically evaluate information, identify credible sources, and understand how algorithms can amplify misinformation is paramount. Supporting independent journalism and fact-checking initiatives can help restore a common factual baseline.
* Restoring Trust in Science and Expertise: This involves transparent communication from scientific institutions, acknowledging uncertainties while maintaining integrity, and fostering public engagement with scientific processes rather than just conclusions. When trust in science erodes, evidence-based policy becomes impossible.
* Strengthening Local and Deliberative Democracies: Rebuilding trust often starts locally. Fostering citizen participation in deliberative processes (e.g., citizen assemblies, participatory budgeting) can build consensus, enhance civic skills, and show that collective action is possible, counteracting apathy and cynicism.

2. Fostering Global Cooperation and Adaptive Governance (Beyond Traditional Nation-States):
* Strengthening International Norms and Rule of Law: Even if the UN itself is difficult to reform, "we the people" can advocate for stronger adherence to international law, human rights, and environmental treaties. Pressure from civil society can push governments to uphold commitments and work collaboratively on shared threats.
* Supporting Transnational Networks and Solutions: Recognizing the limitations of state-centric approaches, emphasis can be placed on strengthening non-state actors—NGOs, scientific collaborations, city networks, philanthropic organizations, and citizen movements—that operate across borders to address issues like climate change, human rights, and humanitarian crises. These networks can develop innovative solutions and put pressure on states.
* Developing Adaptive and Resilient Systems: Focusing on building local and regional resilience to climate shocks, supply chain disruptions, and other crises can mitigate the impact of global instability. This includes local food systems, decentralized energy, and community-based disaster preparedness.

3. Prioritizing Human Development and Addressing Root Causes of Conflict and Discontent:
* Investing in Education and Critical Thinking: Beyond media literacy, a robust education system that promotes critical thinking, empathy, and understanding of diverse perspectives can inoculate future generations against tribalism and simplistic narratives.
* Reducing Inequality and Promoting Economic Justice: Gross economic and social inequalities fuel resentment, political extremism, and social instability. Addressing these through equitable policies, access to opportunities, and social safety nets can reduce the appeal of divisive ideologies and strengthen social cohesion.
* Promoting Conflict Resolution and Peacebuilding: Given the rise of violent extremism and cheaper weaponry, investing in grassroots peacebuilding initiatives, intercultural dialogue, and non-violent conflict resolution skills is crucial at all levels of society.

4. Enhancing Collective Action and Bridging Divides within Progressive Movements:
* Developing Overarching Narratives: Instead of competing, peace, environment, and justice movements could seek to articulate a shared vision and narrative that emphasizes their interdependence. For example, climate change disproportionately affects the poor, and resource scarcity can lead to conflict. Framing these as interconnected challenges can foster broader coalitions.
* Adopting Systems Thinking: Encouraging a "systems thinking" approach within movements can help them see how their specific issues are connected to larger societal structures and how actions in one area can positively or negatively impact others. This could lead to more integrated strategies and resource sharing.
* Leveraging Technology for Coordination: Utilizing digital platforms and tools for better coordination, information sharing, and resource mobilization among disparate organizations can amplify their collective impact and reduce redundant efforts.

In essence, while the global challenges are immense, "we the people" can focus on strengthening the foundations of informed decision-making, fostering resilient communities, and building bridges across traditional divides. This involves a shift from simply advocating for specific policy outcomes to actively rebuilding the societal capacity for collective intelligence, trust, and cooperative action in an increasingly chaotic world.

*

References:


Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131. (General reference for cognitive biases, not specifically for global challenges but applies)
RAND Corporation. (n.d.). Truth Decay: A Global Problem and What to Do About It. Retrieved from https://www.rand.org/research/projects/truth-decay.html (This is a general reference to RAND's work on Truth Decay).
Kavanagh, J., & Rich, M. D. (2018). Truth Decay: An Initial Exploration of the Diminishing Role of Facts and Analysis in American Public Life. RAND Corporation. (This specific RAND publication defines Truth Decay).
Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. Yale University Press. (General reference on state inertia and resistance to change, not specifically on global challenges but relevant).
Hardin, G. (1968). The Tragedy of the Commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243-1248. (Foundational text on the tragedy of the commons).
World Economic Forum. (2024). Global Risks Report 2024. World Economic Forum. (Often cites misinformation as a top global risk and recommends media literacy).
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2017). Communicating Science Effectively: A Research Agenda. The National Academies Press. (Discusses strategies for effective science communication to build trust).
Fung, A., & Wright, E. O. (2003). Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. Verso. (Explores deliberative and participatory democracy models).
International Crisis Group. (n.d.). About Us. Retrieved from https://www.crisisgroup.org/about (International Crisis Group's work focuses on preventing and resolving deadly conflict, often advocating for international norms).
Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Cornell University Press. (A foundational text on transnational advocacy networks).
World Economic Forum. (2024). Global Risks Report 2024. World Economic Forum. (Highlights the need for resilience building).
Nussbaum, M. C. (2010). Not for Profit: Why Democracy Needs the Humanities. Princeton University Press. (Argues for the importance of humanities education for democratic citizenship).
Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Belknap Press. (Provides extensive analysis of inequality and its societal impacts).
Lederach, J. P. (1997). Building Peace: Sustainable Reconciliation in Divided Societies. United States Institute of Peace Press. (A key text on peacebuilding and conflict transformation).
Climate Justice Alliance. (n.d.). About Us. Retrieved from https://climatejusticealliance.org/ (Example of an alliance connecting environmental and social justice).
Meadows, D. H. (2008). Thinking in Systems: A Primer. Chelsea Green Publishing. (Introduces the concept of systems thinking).
Shirky, C. (2008). Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations. Penguin Press. (Discusses how digital tools enable new forms of collective action).

 


Monday, July 28, 2025

Boundaries with teeth- 'letter to the editor' printed today

Needed: Boundaries with teeth

Cal Thomas’ “What standard? What scandal?” (Commentary, July 24) is profound with global implications if applied to the current world chaos. His question of who defines those words is key.

Mr. Thomas makes a solid case with his end quote of the Louis Armstrong lyrics “What a wonderful world this would be” — but only if boundaries are well-defined and kept.

This especially applies to the boundaries put on the protection of human rights and the environment. But instead, United Nations Charter standards have always held the protection of national sovereignty as the highest priority.

This was intentionally engineered by the powers that defeated the evil forces in World War II.

Three years after that horrific war, the world agreed upon a clear boundary: a list of 30 human rights laid out in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. These, it was decided, needed to be kept if we intended to avoid another world war and perpetual chaos.

Unfortunately, the United Nations was never given the power to hold national leaders accountable when those leaders repeatedly violate these unalienable rights (on which our nation’s Founders signed off in our Declaration of Independence).

What is unclear about “the laws of nature and of Nature’s God”? The Constitution still ignores these words from our Declaration. So expect more chaos with the modern acceleration of weapon systems, wars, pathogens, environmental destruction, political polarization, fake news and the decay of “Truths” that we should all have held “to be self-evident” over the past 250 years.

Mr. Thomas needs to expand his own boundaries, accept our global interdependence and insist on keeping people, our governing systems and nature healthy.

CHUCK WOOLERY

Former chair, United Nations Association, Council of Organizations

Rockville


Copyright (c) 2025 Washington Times , Edition 7/28/2025


 

Thursday, July 24, 2025

We need more than words...

 This is today's email from Compassion in Politics <info@compassioninpolitics.com>

While I'm sure they do great work...and love their assertion "We need more than Words" their only boxes for action were "tweet now" or "Donate now" to it.  There was no option for donating to relief or medical needs in Gaza or the West Bank.   

The problem with our words is they are usually ambiguous.  Instead of the unambiguous words needed for engineering a sane and sustainable solution to most progressive causes.  Politics, religion, economics, clever posters, and heart felt poetry won't transform root causes.  This is done by creating political will with unambiguous concepts like "unalienable Rights".   Using the word phrase "Palestinian Rights" suggests theirs are different...as the Jewish state is asserting with its genocidal and ethnic cleaning actions.   

This again exposes the mostly unchallenged US narrative that "we the people" are for human rights even though our budgets and authorization bills reflect just the opposite.  And, like the message below asserts, this is an violation of all of our basic rights to express our profound outrage of the mass murder of innocent people ANYWHERE, ANYTIME, BY ANYONE, or ANY NATION. 

Nothing short of transforming our lethal global governance (UN Charter protecting national sovereignty instead of human rights and the environment) and economic system (this global governance system protecting Capitalism's profit making instead of the health of people, communities, and our environment) when humanity has never had so much money to prevent so many root causes of war, poverty, pandemics, environmental disruption, and media/communication capacity to treat Truth decay. 

Yes.  We need more than words.  We need a fundamental transforming of the global systems that ignores our global interdependence, by codifying independence into our flawed national and economic laws. 

Consider Project 250 (creating an annual day in every community to celebrate and act on the reality that all of humankind is interdependent regarding our health and nature's health.  Step 1:  Within each local community identifying one or more of the 169 goals within the UN 17 Sustainable Development Goals for all of the organizations within the community to work on collectively, to achieve measurable progress. Step 2.  Declare a commitment to break down the organizational issue silos an that have divided peoples collective commitment to make measurable progress on human and environmental health within their own community.  Local cooperation and coordination are key to building resilience within every community given the political borders and those defending them are unable to reduce the global forces felt most in our local communities.  Step 3.  Persist in these actions as needed, with the intention of national forces (policy makers, faith leaders, and business leaders funding the SDGs ASAP). 

Dear Chuck,

The UK government this week joined 27 other countries in condemning the deepening humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza. 

But while the Foreign Secretary's words are strong, they ring hollow because they are not matched by action.  

While ministers speak of peace, British companies are lawfully supplying the engine parts and other supplies used to rain fire on a starving population. While civilians are shot collecting aid, UK-made components are loaded into fighter jets. This is not neutrality, it is complicity.

British companies are profiting from and enabling the mass displacement, starvation and bombardment of civilians and the government is failing to act.  

The United Nations has warned that countries supplying arms to Israel, including the UK, may be complicit in genocide.  

At the same time, those who speak out against these exports—activists, lawyers, human rights campaigners—are being surveilled, stigmatised, arrested and classified as terrorists for daring to challenge a policy that fuels human slaughter.

This isn’t about being pro-Palestinian or pro-Israeli. It’s about being honest about our role in sustaining a war that has shattered every norm of international humanitarian law.

Even our language betrays us. Those who march for peace are labelled  “pro-Palestinian” by the media and politicians alike, as if calling for a ceasefire were an act of allegiance rather than conscience. It reduces opposition to war crimes to a question of sides — when in truth, it’s a question of humanity. It equates calls for peace with antisemitism and criticism of the Israeli government's actions with active support for Hamas. 

We are long past the point where strong statements alone will suffice.

Parliament has risen for the summer recess, but we will be calling on the Government to act every day while Parliament is in recess and the slaughter continues.

Words aren’t enough. We need action now. Starting with the suspension of all arms exports to Israel. We want no UK complicity in genocide.

If you are on Twitter/X, you can support our call by re-tweeting it now.

If you believe politics must be rooted in compassion—not complicity— please support our work.

In truth and urgency,
Jennifer Nadel
CEO, Compassion in Politics

What do wise (men and women) learn from history?

 

History quotes from Men and then Women.

“We've got to teach history based not on what's in fashion but what's important. If we forget what we did, we won't know who we are. I'm warning of an eradication of the American memory that could result, ultimately, in an erosion of the American spirit."  -- Ronald Reagan  40th US President  His farewell address in January 1989

 

"Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times." G. Michael Hopf  in  "Those Who Remain". Reflecting the cyclical nature of history.

“Throughout history, it has been the inaction of those who could have acted, the indifference of those who should have known better, the silence of the voice of justice when it mattered most, that has made it possible for evil to triumph”  Haile Selassie

'We learn from history that we don’t learn from history!" Desmond Tutu

“The only thing we learn from history is that we don’t learn from history.”  Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel.

“What experience and history teaches us is that people and governments have never learned anything from history, or acted on principles deduced from it.”  Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel.

"Those who ignore history are doomed to repeat it; but those who have studied history are nevertheless doomed to stand by while history is repeated anyway." -- anonymous 

“The history of civilization is largely the history of weapons”.  George Orwell.

"History teaches us that men and nations behave wisely once they have exhausted all other alternatives." - Abba Eban

"The study of history is a powerful antidote to contemporary arrogance."  Paul Johnson

“[O]ne of the most refined (and rare) certainties of liberalism is that historical determinism does not exist. History has not been written so as to negate any further appeal. History is the work of men, and just as men can act rightly with measures that push history in the direction of progress and civilization, they can also err, and by conviction, apathy, or cowardice, allow history to slide into anarchy, impoverishment, obscurantism, and barbarism. The culture of democracy can gain new ground and consolidate the advances it has achieved. Or, it can watch its dominions shrink into nothingness, like Balzac's ‘peau de chagrin’. The future depends on us--on our ideas, our votes, and the decisions of those we put in power.   Mario Vargas Llosa, Liberalism in the New Millennium [2000]

“Few will have the greatness to bend history itself, but each of us can work to change a small portion of events, and in the total of all those acts will be written history of this generation.” Robert F Kennedy’s 1966 “Ripple of Hope” speech.  RFK

History quotes from Men and then Women.

“We've got to teach history based not on what's in fashion but what's important. If we forget what we did, we won't know who we are. I'm warning of an eradication of the American memory that could result, ultimately, in an erosion of the American spirit."  -- Ronald Reagan  40th US President  His farewell address in January 1989

"Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times." G. Michael Hopf  in  "Those Who Remain". Reflecting the cyclical nature of history.

'We learn from history that we don’t learn from history!" Desmond Tutu

“The only thing we learn from history is that we don’t learn from history.”  Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel.

“What experience and history teaches us is that people and governments have never learned anything from history, or acted on principles deduced from it.”  Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel.

"Those who ignore history are doomed to repeat it; but those who have studied history are nevertheless doomed to stand by while history is repeated anyway." -- anonymous

“The history of civilization is largely the history of weapons”.  George Orwell.

"History teaches us that men and nations behave wisely once they have exhausted all other alternatives." - Abba Eban

"The study of history is a powerful antidote to contemporary arrogance."  Paul Johnson

“[O]ne of the most refined (and rare) certainties of liberalism is that historical determinism does not exist. History has not been written so as to negate any further appeal. History is the work of men, and just as men can act rightly with measures that push history in the direction of progress and civilization, they can also err, and by conviction, apathy, or cowardice, allow history to slide into anarchy, impoverishment, obscurantism, and barbarism. The culture of democracy can gain new ground and consolidate the advances it has achieved. Or, it can watch its dominions shrink into nothingness, like Balzac's ‘peau de chagrin’. The future depends on us--on our ideas, our votes, and the decisions of those we put in power.   Mario Vargas Llosa, Liberalism in the New Millennium [2000]

“Few will have the greatness to bend history itself, but each of us can work to change a small portion of events, and in the total of all those acts will be written history of this generation.” Robert F Kennedy’s 1966 “Ripple of Hope” speech.  RFK

BELOW are Women’s quotes regarding history

 Barbara Tuchman (historian, The March of Folly):  “To a historian, hindsight is not merely clearer than perception-in-the-moment but also unfair to those who actually lived through the moment.”

“The persistence of error is the rule in human history.”

Maya Angelou (poet, civil rights activist):  “History, despite its wrenching pain, cannot be unlived, but if faced with courage, need not be lived again.”

Margaret MacMillan (historian, The Uses and Abuses of History): “History is not a cookbook offering pretested recipes. It teaches by analogy, not by maxims.”

Gerda Lerner (pioneering feminist historian): “When I discovered the existence of women’s history, I discovered my own history. That changed my life.”

“The system perpetuates itself by teaching us to forget history. That forgetting is a form of power.”

On Power, Memory, and Truth

Arundhati Roy (writer, activist):  “There’s really no such thing as the ‘voiceless.’ There are only the deliberately silenced, or the preferably unheard.”

Simone de Beauvoir (philosopher, feminist): “The past is an anchor, not a sail.”

Gloria Jean Watkins (September 25, 1952 – December 15, 2021), better known by her pen name bell hooks (author, cultural critic):  “Life-transforming ideas have always come to me through books. That’s why I believe reading, and especially reading history, is a form of resistance.”

On Gender, Erasure, and Historical Justice

Roxane Gay (author, essayist): “The problem is not that history is written by the victors. It’s that it’s usually written by the same kind of victors—white, male, and privileged.”

Mary Beard (classicist, historian):  “You cannot easily fit women into a structure that is already coded as male; you have to change the structure.”

Audre Lorde (writer, civil rights activist):  “Your silence will not protect you.”

In my opinion - here is the best for last!!! 

“It takes a female to have a baby,
It takes a woman to raise a child,
It takes a mother to raise them correctly,
It takes a warrior to show them how to change the world.”
Shannon L. Alder 

Thursday, July 17, 2025

Today the Washington Post printed my Letter to the editor RE Conspiracy Theories

 In his July 13 opinion column, “Why Americans are so prone to conspiracies,” David Von Drehle explained our conspiracy theory dilemma but didn’t offer any biological reasons for this tendency — or potential solutions to curb it.

Human creativity is connected to our minds’ powerful capacity for pattern recognition; we have the capacity to believe literally anything.  And we don’t always question what we see or hear from others within our beloved tribe. We assume there are obvious connections even when there are none. Our past successes have built unwarranted confidence and a limited ability to understand reality. Our brains, originally wired to assist our families and tribes to survive and thrive, must now adapt urgently to cope with the acceleration of global chaos.

Conspiracy theories will continue. Some are justifiable — and sometimes, they may even be true. But Hayden Planetarium director Neil deGrasse Tyson has articulated a concept very useful for healing our species’ current detachment from reality: the difference between our personal, political and objective truths. In our current era of accelerating truth decay, relearning how to think and how to relate to the real world as it truly is matters now more than ever.

Chuck Woolery, Rockville


Below is a much longer and poorly written letter I originally submitted.  They did a fine job of editing and condensing it - but left out some details that might deepen our understanding of our mind's inherently flaws. 

David Von Drehle explained our conspiracy theory dilemma (Sunday op-ed) but didn’t offer any biological reasons or potential solutions.

Our conspiracy beliefs are primarily driven by several flaws in our Pleistocene mind within our brain.

First, our species uses reactionary thinking instead of the deeper thinking it is capable of.

Second, our creative genius plus our opposable thumbs has enabled humans to swiftly advance our ability to survive and thrive - The two most important things that every life form is hardwired for.

Our mind’s creativity is connected to its powerful capacity for pattern recognition, enabled by 5 (maybe 6) variable sensory receptors. (Note that plants have about 20 different sensor mechanisms and they have existed for about a billion years longer than primates).  Our mind has the capacity to believe literally anything. And we don’t always question what we see or hear from others within our beloved tribe.  We assume there are obvious connections even when there are none.  Thus, our mind’s past successes have built unwarranted confidence and a limited ability to understand reality.


So, over the last 6000 years, human populations have expanded as our minds created certain concepts like religion, politics, trading systems.  These helped bond and protect our growing tribes. But these concepts too often lead to killing others or insisting they adapt.

Primates will always fight and compete!  But only the human species has created weapons of mass destruction and a mindset that can justify mass murder or genocide on a scale our human DNA was not hardwired for.  

So now our minds are in control, not humankind’s original spirit of ‘being human’ and resolving conflict without mass slaughter, which originally was not a conscious option. Yet that is what we are now choosing.

Our mind’s original purpose of assisting our family and tribe to survive and thrive must now urgently adapt to avoid our current acceleration of global chaos, massive suffering, and preventable deaths. 

We must collectively grasp that our family is humankind.  Abraham Lincoln, Martin Luther King, and other wise souls, using deep objective reasoning, have summarized that we will either live together as family or perish together as fools.


Charles Darwin recognized in evolution that things are always changing. Life forms that fail to adapt become extinct.  Of the billions of life forms ever existing on our Goldie locks planet - 99.9% have gone extinct.  Unless we quickly recognize that all humankind is genetically 99.9% the same - with an intelligence that has now created non-biological super intelligence - our family’s only chance of survival is one or both sources of intelligence finally gaining collective wisdom.   And then, deciding to stop defending the various concepts that once worked but are now our greatest mental problem.


Conspiracy theories will continue. Some are justifiable and sometimes true.  Neil deGrasse Tyson wisely framed a concept very useful for healing our species’ current detachment from reality - and our insanity of doing the same thing over and over again, expecting a different outcome.   He observes three types of truth.  Our personal, political, and objective truths.  The first two have flaws that should be self-evident to any deep-thinking being.  And the understanding that objective Truths are never governed by majority rule.  Truths like gravity, 2+2=4, unalienable rights, and a child should not die before their parent(s).  In our current era of accelerating truth decay, re-learning how to think and how to relate to the real world as it Truly is, is now more than ever.



Sunday, July 13, 2025

Mental Health is the key to Health and global sustainably. And the peace that most people desire for all of humanity

Being comfortable will not lead to health or peace. Our mind evolved to wrestle with problems for improving our chances of surviving and thriving.  Now we use our mind's for defending flawed concepts (political, religious, cultural, social, economic, philosophical...).  Stress is not bad. It's required for growth of every system in our body. 

"There can be no health without mental health." Rawle Andrews Jr., Esq. Executive Director American Psychiatric Association Foundation. July 2023

"The foundation of all Mental Illness is the unwillingness to experience legitimate suffering." Carl Jung

"Our life is what our thoughts make it. A man will find that as he alters his thoughts toward things and other people, things and others will alter towards him."  -- James Allen   (1864-1912) Author  Source: As a Man Thinketh, 1902

"To ignore the evidence, and hope that it cannot be true, is more an evidence of mental illness.''  -- William Blase

"A healthy mind observes and questions itself. This is the path to inner peace and happiness. Don't believe everything you think."  - Vironika Tugaleva 2014? 

“It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society.”   Jiddu Krisnamurti   December 28, 2007 

"Man needs difficulties; they are necessary for health.’ – Carl Jung

"Comfort is the enemy. Our minds and body were engineer for action and solving problems" Anonymous 

“We must not conceal from ourselves that no improvement in the present depressing situation is possible without a severe struggle; for the handful of those who are really determined to do something is minute in comparison with the mass of the lukewarm and the misguided. And those who have an interest in keeping the machinery of war going are a very powerful body; they will stop at nothing to make public opinion subservient to their murderous ends.” - Albert Einstein, 1934

“People use drugs, legal and illegal, because their lives are intolerably painful or dull. They hate their work and find no rest in their leisure. They are estranged from their families and their neighbors. It should tell us something that in healthy societies drug use is celebrative, convivial, and occasional, whereas among us it is lonely, shameful, and addictive. We need drugs, apparently, because we have lost each other.”  ― Wendell Berry, The Art of the Commonplace: The Agrarian Essays

“Some online games have become the new opium to poison the growth of teenagers,” Yu Xinwen, a vice president of Guangzhou University 2018

"All our lauded technological progress - our very civilization - is like the axe in the hand of the pathological criminal." - Albert Einstein

US surgeons are killing themselves at an alarming rate. One decided to speak out  The grueling profession has long kept silent about mental distress. After losing a friend and quietly grappling with illness, Carrie Cunningham found a new way to save lives.  by Christina Frangou  26 Sep 2023  https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/sep/26/surgeons-suicide-doctors-physicians-mental-health 

World in mental health crisis of 'monumental suffering', say experts:  Lancet report says 13.5 million lives could be saved every year if mental illness addressed.    Sarah Boseley  Health editor   Tue 9 Oct 2018 18.30 EDTLast modified on Wed 10 Oct 2018.  https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/oct/09/world-mental-health-crisis-monumental-suffering-say-experts

Every country in the world is facing and failing to tackle a mental health crisis, from epidemics of anxiety and depression to conditions caused by violence and trauma, according to a review by experts that estimates the rising cost will hit $16tn (£12tn) by 2030.

A team of 28 global experts assembled by the Lancet medical journal says there is a “collective failure to respond to this global health crisis” which “results in monumental loss of human capabilities and avoidable suffering.”

The burden of mental ill-health is rising everywhere, says the Lancet Commission, in spite of advances in the understanding of the causes and options for treatment. “The quality of mental health services is routinely worse than the quality of those for physical health,” says their report, launched at a global ministerial mental health summit in London.

When it comes to mental health, says the commission, every country is a developing country. “Government investment and development assistance for mental health remain pitifully small,” says the report. The high cost of $16tn by 2030 is estimated from previous World Bank data on the loss to the global economy of people of working age with mental health problems.

In some countries, people with mental disorders are abused and incarcerated, it says. “Human rights violations and abuses persist in many countries, with large numbers of people locked away in mental institutions or prisons, or living on the streets, often without legal protection,” it says.

Prof Vikram Patel of the Harvard Medical School, joint lead editor, said mental ill-health caused “colossal human suffering” and was responsible for substantial numbers of deaths that are attributed to other causes. “Mental health problems kill more young people than any other cause around the world,” he said.

Suicides are attributed to deaths from injuries. Opioid deaths are considered to be drug misuse. “We are treating mental illness as a risk factor,” said Patel. “A lot of global health priority setting has historically been around diseases that kill.” The commission estimates that 13.5 million deaths every year could be averted if the underlying mental ill-health problems were addressed.

In many countries there is no expectation of help. Surveys in India and China, which have a third of the global population, suggest that more than 80% of people with any mental health or substance use disorder did not seek treatment. And when they do seek help, the quality is poor.

Human rights violations occur most often against people with mental health disorders such as schizophrenia and learning disabilities. “Tens of thousands of people with mental disorders are chained in their own homes, or in prayer camps and traditional healing facilities,” says the report.

When people are freed, it may be without warning or proper preparation for their care, leading sometimes to arrest, imprisonment and early death. “In 2016, a tragic case occurred in South Africa when the Gauteng Department of Health stopped funding a large 2,000- bed facility and allowed the dis-charge of vulnerable people with psychosocial disability into improperly licensed community residential facilities, leading to the death of more than 140 people,” says the report.

The commission recommends a much higher priority for mental health and parity with physical healthcare, as well as the integration of mental health care into routine primary care.

800,000 people kill themselves every year. What can we do?  Lady Gaga and Tedros Adhanom   Oct. 19, 2018   https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/oct/09/lady-gaga-mental-health-global-emergency-suicide   

Most will only find peace of mind when we rest in peace.  Our mind's evolved for wrestling with life's dilemmas and reducing preventable deaths, suffering, and environmental destruction.  cw

Friday, July 11, 2025

Truth Is a Threat to the Tyranny of Toxic Positivity By Quanta DL.

From: Quanta Dawn-Light <quant...@gmail.com>  Sent: Friday, July 11, 2025 9:02 AM
To: Chuck Woolery <chuck@igc.org>    Subject: Fwd: Truth is...

A wise and courageous women sent this to me this AM and gave me permission to post it.  I'm guessing many of us have thought it but were afraid of saying it.  Brad Blanton once write a book titled "Radical Honesty".  I don't believe Quanta Dawn-Light read it...her words are just a self-evident truth...that needs to be shared and taken into account in our daily lives and conversations...if we are serious about making change.    If you would like to respond to her email it to project250@earthlink.net and I'll get it to her.  

Truth Is a Threat to the Tyranny of Toxic Positivity: Women Must Rise Like Joan of Arc for Truth and Peace!

In a world saturated with curated images of harmony, hashtags of hope, and a deluge of motivational messages, peace polls, peace parks, peace webinars, peace this and peace that -a deeper, uncomfortable truth is often silenced: we are witnessing global systems fail the most vulnerable. Innocent children are starving. Women are being brutalized in wars fueled by greed and geopolitical games. Yet many peace organizations bask in the glow of public relations campaigns and sanitized narratives that hide their complicity or impotence. This is the tyranny of toxic positivity—a culture that avoids confronting the roots of violence, injustice, and hypocrisy in favor of feel-good illusions. And in such times, truth-telling becomes a revolutionary act. Today, women must rise like Joan of Arc—not as passive peacekeepers, but as bold, unyielding warriors for truth and justice.

The Mask of Toxic Positivity

Toxic positivity is not merely about optimistic thinking; it is a distortion of emotional intelligence that weaponizes cheerfulness against truth. It pressures individuals and institutions to smile through suffering, to “stay positive” even as atrocities unfold in plain sight. It suppresses grief, outrage, and righteous anger—all of which are natural and necessary responses to injustice. As a mother I am empowered with the life giving force who carried a child in my womb, I can sense the cry of Mother Earth as she carries eight billion of her children in her womb, to be born again to journey in the Universe in places beyond limited human comprehension. So, what is it that we can do to shake up the conscience of male homosapiens who savagely and with stupidity terrorize his earthly siblings with monstrous weapons and waste resources for destructive wars? Why are we compliant and silent and fragmented in our struggle? 

In the peacebuilding world, this culture often manifests through language that avoids blame, shies away from structural critique, and preaches neutrality in the face of brutality. Organizations brand themselves as apolitical, unifying, and solution-oriented. But what solutions can arise from willful blindness? What kind of peace is built when the funding behind peace efforts comes from corporations or governments involved in arms manufacturing, extractive industries, or human rights violations?

This is the moral crisis of modern peace activism: when organizations touting nonviolence are, knowingly or not, entangled in systems of violence. They may host summits, publish white papers, or receive awards—all while remaining silent about genocide, settler colonialism, or imperial warfare. And they silence or sideline voices—especially from the Global South, Indigenous communities, and women—who dare to speak truths that disrupt their fundraising narratives. Not mentioning that the top managers of many organizations for human services are making exorbitant salaries, while poverty and hunger ravages humanity

Joan of Arc: A Feminine Archetype of Truth and Resistance

History gives us icons to draw strength from. Joan of Arc, the young peasant girl who defied kings and armies, is one such figure. She was not a diplomat or a passive mediator; she was a visionary who spoke truth to power, led with conviction, and inspired a nation. Her weapon was not just a sword—it was her uncompromising voice. Let all women take her example, today.

Today, women are called again to this sacred fire. Not to mimic the violence of empire, but to lead with moral clarity, courage, and the prophetic power of truth. Across the globe, from mothers in Gaza and Sudan to grandmothers in Ukraine and Congo, women are rising—not with platitudes, but with pleas for survival. These women are often silenced or rendered invisible by peace institutions that prefer tidy stories and controlled narratives. But true peace is not polite. It is not quiet. It is not comfortable. Peace forged through silence and complicity is not peace—it is managed injustice.

Follow the Money: Peace Funded by Conflict

Many peace organizations rely on funding from governments or corporate donors whose economic interests are tied to war. A peace NGO may receive millions in sponsorships from entities that profit off resource extraction in conflict zones or supply weapons to warring parties. This is not just ironic—it is corrupt. It is a betrayal of the very principles these organizations claim to uphold.

Accepting money without questioning its source is not neutral—it is strategic blindness. When peace institutions are sustained by the spoils of violence, their programs are compromised. Their campaigns may call for de-escalation while avoiding any discussion of arms embargoes. They may promote resilience and trauma healing while avoiding accountability for the forces that caused the trauma. This is not peace—it is performance and disguised as being non-political in inter/national affairs.

To confront this contradiction, we must demand transparency and ethical integrity. We must ask: who funds the peace we are offered, and what are they buying in return? If an organization cannot stand against genocide, cannot name the aggressor, or cannot center the voices of the oppressed, it has lost its way.

The Children Are Waiting

At the heart of this conversation are the innocent: the children who go to bed hungry because food has been used as a weapon of war. The women who are raped, displaced, or left to die because global leaders play power games with borders and resources. These are not unfortunate byproducts—they are deliberate strategies in modern warfare. And unless we are willing to name that, we cannot hope to change it.

Women must now rise—not just in mourning, not just in advocacy—but in fierce, organized resistance. This does not mean violence, but it does mean refusing to cooperate with lies. It means confronting the soft fascism of positive thinking that asks us to smile while we are bleeding. It means telling the truth, even when it costs us comfort, status, or funding. 

Conclusion: Truth as Peace-Building

Truth is not the enemy of peace—it is its foundation. False unity built on silence is brittle. Real peace requires rupture, reckoning, and radical honesty. It requires leaders who are not afraid to confront both enemies abroad and contradictions within. It calls for humility, sacrifice, -detachment from what holds us on fragile foundations of false optimism; a pacifier, silencer and fake happiness.

Let women be the new army—not with guns, but with sacred sparks and flames for truth.  Let them speak, write, march, and disrupt. Let them name the systems of oppression and expose the wolves in peacekeeper’s clothing. Let them stand for the children, the land, and the future. And let the truth shatter the tyranny of toxic positivity—so that something real, and sacred, can finally be born.

So, this is for everyone who live with the principle of "service above self" and by 4 Way Test (for truth). I wrote a paragraph and asked AI to expand for an essay, it wrote an emotionally evoking, mindfully instructive heartfelt essay for truth. 

https://www.growthinktank.org/en/women-war-and-peace-those-women-who-take-up-arms-for-peace/  

Below will soon be an art piece she commissioned via ChatGPT.

“It takes a female to have a baby, 

It takes a woman to raise a child,

It takes a mother to raise them correctly,

It takes a warrior to show them how to change the world.” 

― Shannon L. Alder


Friday, July 4, 2025

Fundamental Principles or perish

 “Say not, 'I have found the truth,' but rather, 'I have found a truth.' “ Khalil Gibran - The Prophet

“A frequent recurrence to fundamental principles ... is absolutely necessary to preserve the blessings of liberty and keep a government free.”  Benjamin Franklin

"The danger to which the success of revolutions is most exposed, is that of attempting them before the principles on which they proceed, and the advantages to result from them, are sufficiently seen and understood."   -- Thomas Paine    (1737-1809) US Founding father, pamphleteer, author

Fundamental principle (noun) - principles from which other truths can be derived; "first you must learn the fundamentals"; "let's get down to basics"   Bedrock principle - a basic truth or law or assumption;  

The greatest speech in American history may be The Gettysburg Address. It begins with it’s author referring to the fundamental principle used in the creation of our nation “all men are created equal”.   He was not referring to the U.S. Constitution.  “Four Score and Seven years ago” referred to the Declaration of Independence.  He did NOT say ‘all Americans men’ are created equal.  

Even more important…  his conclusion declared that “the great task remaining before us” is “that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom…”.   He did NOT say ‘this’ government.   He said, “that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.”  

In saying “that government” suggests the great value and power of “We the people” having agency in the creation and implementation of any government we decide to live under.   Is this agency a fundamental principle?  It is, but only valuable if virtuously applied can it ensure the fundamental principle of human freedom. 

Thomas Paine in his “Common Sense” pamphlet wrote that the only legitimate purpose of government is protecting human freedom and security.  He never mentions national sovereignty which is the freedom of nations to ignore fundamental human rights and the environment upon which all life depends.  The consistent protection of these rights are vital globally if the systems we have created are to be effectively and sustainably managed in human affairs…with the “government” system…“of the people, by the people, for the people shall not perish from the earth.”  

Freedom is the first fundamental principle of life.  We are free to think, say, and do whatever we want. The 2nd  FP is there will always be consequences to freedom.  This FP is inseparable from the first.  The 3rd FP.  To sustain humanities maximum freedom and security — we must be aware, responsible, virtuous, and accountable for how we and our government use our individual freedoms and our national sovereignty.

4th FP:  Justice for all.  The Magna Carta is one of the most famous documents in history. It was established in 1215 by King John of England as a practical solution to the political crisis he faced then. “The Great Charter or Charter of Liberties” recognized the fundamental principle that everybody, even the king, was subject to the law. 


5FP:  A child should not die before their parents.  The fundamental purpose of life it so procreate.  Any human activity that limits the freedom of a couple determined to accomplish this is in violation of nature’s law. 


6th FP:  If the conditions that one lives in is unlivable (an imminent mortal danger or threat) then those threatened have the fundamental right to move away from those conditions-  or correct them. And even correct those who are responsible for creating such conditions.  


7th FP:  Security is not a function of strength or disarmament.  It is a function of liberty and justice for all created with virtuous acts consistent with “the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God”. 


8th FP:  All living things have two basic drives.  The survive and thrive. 


9th FP:  The human mind evolved as a problem solving tool. Using it to defend flawed concepts in an era of unprecedented killing capacity is species suicide.  Anything other than abiding by the Golden Rule moves us closer to chaos that will not end well.  


10th FP:  Our immune system protects us from most natural lethal forces. To the degree we harm it by the things we put into our bodies or harm things around us, is the degree to which our mind has failed it primary function.  


11th FP:  Humans may learn best from stories.  But unless we learn and apply objective Truths rather than defending personal or political truths that we acquire from others or creative thoughts, do not expect things to work well for very long. 




SUMMARY:  Everything is connected, interdependent, and vulnerable.  Absent a global system of accountability - any attempt to maximize human freedom and security for all - will be limited.  cw


"Bad men cannot make good citizens. It is impossible that a nation of infidels or idolaters should be a nation of freemen. It is when a people forget God that tyrants forge their chains. A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, is incompatible with freedom. No free government, or the blessings of liberty, can be preserved to any people but by a firm adherence to justice, moderation, temperance, frugality, and virtue; and by a frequent recurrence to fundamental principles."  -- Patrick Henry  (1736-1799) US Founding Father   Source: Attributed - no source found.


Temporary deviations from fundamental principles are always more or less dangerous. When the first pretext fails, those who become interested in prolonging the evil will rarely be at a loss for other pretexts. The first precedent too familiarizes the people to the irregularity, lessens their veneration for those fundamental principles, & makes them a more easy prey to Ambition and self Interest.  – James Madison, Letter to Caleb Wallace [1785]


"That frequent recurrence to fundamental principles, and a firm adherence to justice, moderation, temperance, industry and frugality, are absolutely necessary to preserve the blessings of liberty, and keep government free. The people ought, therefore, to pay particular attention to these points, in the choice of officers and representatives, and have a right to exact a due and constant regard to them, from their legislators and magistrates, in the making and executing such laws as are necessary for the good government of the State."  -- Vermont Declaration of Rights  Source: Article 16


"If liberty is worth keeping and free representative government worth saving, we must stand for all American fundamentals—not some, but all. All are woven into the great fabric of our national well-being. We cannot hold fast to some only, and abandon others that, for the moment, we find inconvenient. If one American fundamental is prostrated, others in the end will surely fall."   -- Albert J. Beveridge  (1862-1927) American historian, US Senator (R-IN)  1920



"A man may have to die for our country: but no man must, in any exclusive sense, live for his country. He who surrenders himself without reservation to the temporal claims of a nation, or a party, or a class is rendering to Caesar that which, of all things, most emphatically belongs to God: himself."  -- C. S. Lewis   (1898-1963), British novelist


"Many Americans hunger for a different kind of society -- one based on principles of caring, ethical and spiritual sensitivity, and communal solidarity. Their need for meaning is just as intense as their need for economic security." - Michael Lerner, journalist


"And this I must fight against: any idea, religion or government which limits or destroys the individual.  This is what I am and what I am about.  I can understand why a system built on a pattern must try to destroy the free mind, for this is the one thing which can by inspection destroy such a system."

-- John Steinbeck  (1902-1968) Author, Nobel laureate.  Source: East of Eden, 1952


"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." - Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)


“That no free government, or the blessing of liberty, can be preserved to any people but by a firm adherence to justice, moderation, temperance, frugality, and virtue, and by frequent recurrence to fundamental principles.”  George Mason, Virginia Declaration of Rights [1776]


"Bad men cannot make good citizens. It is impossible that a nation of infidels or idolaters should be a nation of freemen. It is when a people forget God that tyrants forge their chains. A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, is incompatible with freedom. No free government, or the blessings of liberty, can be preserved to any people but by a firm adherence to justice, moderation, temperance, frugality, and virtue; and by a frequent recurrence to fundamental principles."

-- Patrick Henry  (1736-1799) US Founding Father    Source: Attributed - no source found.


Temporary deviations from fundamental principles are always more or less dangerous. When the first pretext fails, those who become interested in prolonging the evil will rarely be at a loss for other pretexts. The first precedent too familiarizes the people to the irregularity, lessens their veneration for those fundamental principles, & makes them a more easy prey to Ambition and self Interest.  – James Madison, Letter to Caleb Wallace [August 23, 1785]


"Human nature itself is evermore an advocate for liberty. There is also in human nature a resentment of injury, and indignation against wrong. A love of truth and a veneration of virtue. These amiable passions, are the "latent spark"… If the people are capable of understanding, seeing and feeling the differences between true and false, right and wrong, virtue and vice, to what better principle can the friends of mankind apply than to the sense of this difference?"  -- John Adams  (1735-1826) Founding Father, 2nd US President.  Source: the Novanglus, 1775  (also under freedom)


Without religion, I believe that learning does real mischief to the morals and principles of mankind.  Benjamin Rush


"A frequent recurrence to the fundamental principles of the constitution, and a 

constant adherence to those of piety, justice, moderation, temperance, industry 

and frugality, are absolutely necessary to preserve the advantages of liberty, 

and to maintain a free government."  -- Massachusetts Bill of Rights  1780



A thing moderately good is not so good as it ought to be. Moderation in temper is always a virtue, but moderation in principle is always a vice.  – Thomas Paine, The Rights of Man [1791]


"The deterioration of every government begins with the decay of the principles on which it was founded." -- Charles-Louis De Secondat   (1689-1755) Baron de Montesquieu

Source: The Spirit of the Laws, 1748


Always stand on principle, even if you stand alone.  – John Quincy Adams


"The main thing is to keep the main thing the main thing."  -- Steven R. Covey


Reason and Ignorance, the opposites of each other, influence the great bulk of mankind. If either of these can be rendered sufficiently extensive in a country, the machinery of Government goes easily on. Reason obeys itself; and Ignorance submits to whatever is dictated to it.  – Thomas Paine, Rights of Man [1791]


"If we work in marble, it will perish; if we work upon brass, time will efface it; if we rear temples, they will crumble into dust; but if we work upon immortal minds and instill into them just principles, we are then engraving upon tablets which no time will efface, but will brighten and brighten to all eternity": Daniel Webster


"Not until right is founded upon reverence will it be secure;

not until duty is based upon love will it be complete;

not until liberty is based on eternal principles

will it be full, equal, lofty, and universal."   -- Henry Giles   (1809-1882)


“What experience and history teach us is this—that people and governments never have learned anything from history, or acted on principles deduced from it.”  Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770-1831)

"That principle is, that the sole end for which mankind are warranted, individually or collectively, in interfering with the liberty of action of any of their number, is self-protection. That the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others. His own good, either physical or moral, is not sufficient warrant."

-- John Stuart Mill  (1806-1873) English philosopher and economist   Source: John Stuart Mill, On Liberty (1859)



"History has taught us time and again that political power always raises its angry fist when timeless principles are lost. We know that without the scale of "self-evident truths" grounded in the "laws of nature and nature's God," every culture eventually finds itself subject to the rule of the gang or the tyranny of the individual. Recognizing this, scholars of all ages have confidently given their hearts and minds to the words, "You shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free." -- Everett Piper, President of Oklahoma Wesleyan University   Source: 'Bethlehem, Not Berkeley, Is the Birthplace of Free Speech,' The Christian Post, Apr 27, 2017


"There are many men of principle in both parties in America, but there is no party of principle."

-- Alexis de Tocqueville   (1805-1859) French historian


"If liberty is worth keeping and free representative government worth saving, we must stand for all American fundamentals—not some, but all. All are woven into the great fabric of our national well-being. We cannot hold fast to some only, and abandon others that, for the moment, we find inconvenient. If one American fundamental is prostrated, others in the end will surely fall."

-- Albert J. Beveridge  (1862-1927) American historian, US Senator (R-IN)  1920


"Human nature itself is evermore an advocate for liberty. There is also in human nature a resentment of injury, and indignation against wrong. A love of truth and a veneration of virtue. These amiable passions, are the "latent spark"… If the people are capable of understanding, seeing and feeling the differences between true and false, right and wrong, virtue and vice, to what better principle can the friends of mankind apply than to the sense of this difference?"

-- John Adams  (1735-1826) Founding Father, 2nd US President   Source: the Novanglus, 1775


Another idealists founding quote for justice...truth (self evident?) and best principle...


"A greater principle is at stake than the fate of any particular president."  -- Benjamin Curtis

(1809-1874) Associate Justice of the US Supreme Court  Source: Dissenting in Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857). 



"You want sanity, democracy, community, an intact Earth? We can't get there obeying Constitutional theory and law crafted by slave masters, imperialists, corporate masters, and Nature destroyers. We can't get there kneeling before robed lawyers stockpiling class plunder precedent up their venerable sleeves. So isn't disobedience the challenge of our age? Principled, inventive, escalating disobedience to liberate our souls, to transfigure our work as humans on this Earth." Richard Grossman

"If the citizens neglect their Duty and place unprincipled men in office, the government will soon be corrupted; laws will be made, not for the public good so much as for selfish or local purposes; corrupt or incompetent men will be appointed to execute the Laws; the public revenues will be squandered on unworthy men; and the rights of the citizen will be violated or disregarded."  Noah Webster  (1758-1843)    

"Only reason can convince us of those three fundamental truths: without a recognition of which there can be no effective liberty:  That what we believe is not necessarily true; that what we like is not necessarily good; and that all questions are open." - -- Clive Bell - (1881-1964) - Source: Civilization, 1928 

"Most new insights come only after a superabundant accumulation of facts have removed the blindness which prevented us from seeing what later comes to be regarded as obvious."   -- Isidor Issac Rabi   (1898-1988) Galician-born American physicist, 1944 Nobel laureate for his discovery of nuclear magnetic resonance



"Nothing can bring you peace but the triumph of principles"  Ralph Waldo Emerson 


"No legal plunder: This is the principle of justice, peace, order, stability, harmony, and logic.  Until the day of my death, I shall proclaim this principle with all the force of my lungs (which alas! is all too inadequate)."  Frederic Bastiat   Source: his book  The Law 1850


"A person will worship something, have no doubt about that. We may think our tribute is paid in secret in the dark recesses of our hearts, but it will out. That which dominates our imaginations and our thoughts will determine our lives, and our character. Therefore, it behooves us to be careful what we worship, for what we are worshiping we are becoming: - "Ralph Waldo Emerson.


"There can be no compromise on basic principles.

There can be no compromise on moral issues.

There can be no compromise on matters of knowledge,

of truth, of rational conviction."  -- Ayn Rand


"In selecting men for office, let principle be your guide. Regard not the particular sect or denomination of the candidate -- look at his character. It is alleged by men of loose principles, or defective views of the subject, that religion and morality are not necessary or important qualifications for political stations. But the scriptures teach a different doctrine. They direct that rulers should be men who rule in the fear of God, men of truth, hating covetousness. It is to the neglect of this rule that we must ascribe the multiplied frauds, breaches of trust, speculations and embezzlements of public property which astonish even ourselves; which tarnish the character of our country and which disgrace our government. When a citizen gives his vote to a man of known immorality, he abuses his civic responsibility; he not only sacrifices his own responsibility; he sacrifices not only his own interest, but that of his neighbor; he betrays the interest of his country."  -- Noah Webster

(1758-1843) American patriot and scholar, author of the first dictionary of American English usage (1806) and the author of the 1828 edition of the dictionary that bears his name.


"No government is respectable which is not just. Without unspotted purity of public faith, without sacred public principle, fidelity, and honor, no machinery of laws, can give dignity to political society."

-- Daniel Webster (1782-1852) US Senator.





"Governments have never learned anything from history, or acted on principles deducted from it." - Friedrich Hebbel, German poet and dramatist


"Bear in mind this sacred principle, that though the will of the majority is in all cases to prevail,  that will to be rightful must be reasonable;  that the minority possess their equal rights,  which equal law must protect, and to violate would be oppression."  -- Thomas Jefferson  Source: First Inaugural Address, 4 March 1801



Moral universalism (also called moral objectivism) is the meta-ethical position that some system of ethics, or a universal ethic, applies universally, that is, for "all similarly situated individuals", regardless of culture, race, sex, religion, nationality, sexual orientation, or any other distinguishing feature. 


Ethical universalism is a concept in which the ethical implications of an action applies universally to anyone, regardless of circumstance. To summarize, the end justifies the means. Examples of pseudo-universally wrong actions: murder, rape, torture.

Moral universalism is the position in meta-ethics that some moral values, or moral system, can be applied universally to everyone — or at least everyone in similar circumstances. It is also known as universal morality, moderate moral realism or minimal moral realism, and is a form of ethical objectivism.

Moral universalism holds that moral values apply to individuals regardless of their personal opinion, or the majority opinion of their culture. Other characteristics such as religion, race or gender are also excluded from moral judgements.

Moral universalism does not neccessarily imply that morals exist apart from humanity itself, but considers sources of morality outside of opinion. Universal truths about human nature and/or reason may come into play as reasons for the universality and objectivism of morality.

Moral realism and moral absolutism are strong forms of universalism. Realism is stronger in that it holds that moral truths are real in the same sense that other truths, such as those about the physical world, are real, while absolutism holds that moral and immoral acts are always so regardless of context.


Fundamental Principles vs Alternative Principles  


Fundamental principles are laws that when violated lead to undesirable consequences, chaos, suffering, or an unsustainable existence. 

Alternative Principles are more like good ideas that we humans create use to make our own laws with confidence they will work consistently.  The rarely work long and even more rarely work sustainability. 


Fundamental Principles (These fall into two basic categories)

1. The Laws of Nature:  Gravity.  Speed of light.  Entropy. Change. Competition. Adapt to thrive and survive.  Prevention is cheaper than reactionary policy. Peace is a function of justice, not armaments or disarmament. People want to maximize their freedom and security.  Nothing is independent of everything else. The world is interdependent. Everything in the universe consists of systems, structures and fundamental principles - except most political ideologies, human laws, and public policies.


2. The Laws of Nature’s God:  Justice, Unity, Love/stewardship of all creation. Responsibility. Accountability. Individual Sovereignty.   Freedom and inalienable rights are gifts from Nature’s God-- not determined by government decree. A child should not die before their parents. Justice for all or security for none. 


“And reason teaches all mankind who will but consult it, that being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty or possessions.”  John Locke 

 

Alternative Principles: Principles creatively conceived by human minds that are the basis of most flawed human laws.  Peace through Strength.  Might makes right.  MAD will keep us safe.  Democracy works.  Capitalism works.  The market will solve the problem.  A federation ensures peace. Everyone wants peace!  Nations are independent.  National Sovereignty can protect us.   America First!  Love is all you need. Non-violence is the answer.  We are the greatest nation on earth. The US Constitution is our best means of protecting our freedom and security. Preserving our national sovereignty is our best means of protecting our freedom and security. 


"The great ideals of liberty and equality are preserved against the assaults of opportunism, the expediency of the passing hour, the erosion of small encroachments, the scorn and derision of those who have no patience with general principles." -- Justice Benjamin Cardozo  (1870-1938) U.S. Supreme Court Justice.  Source: Nature of Judicial Process, 1921



Human laws fall into five basic categories.  1) Laws that are just, enforceable, and applied equally to all. 2) Laws that are just but enforced unevenly.  3) Laws that are enforceable, unjust, and thus invalid. 4) Laws that are not enforceable (International law and rules with no relevant application - like the law of unintended consequences?)   5) Laws that are created democratically, enforceable, applied equally to all, and protective of fundamental inalienable human rights. 


"The study of history is a powerful antidote to contemporary arrogance. It is humbling to discover how many of our glib assumptions, which seem to us novel and plausible, have been tested before, not once but many times and in innumerable guises; and discovered to be, at great human cost, wholly false." - Paul Johnson

 

Putting multiple ‘principles’ together can help create something close to a fundamental principle. Like the four basic principles the US military claims to use that could be the best means of achieving a functional defense against most threats.  


1. Global surveillance (early detection)

2. Rapid response.

3. R&D (know what you are dealing with and now best to deal with it).

4. Prevention.  Do what’s possible to keep it from becoming a threat.



Governance philosophers would be unwise to challenge any of these four fundamental principles underlying human sustainability. 


1.  Justice for all or security for none.  This is a fundamental principle of the interdependent world we have today.  It is a world where billions of people struggle to live with injustices that threaten the security of all.  Regimes that are repressive, debilitating, or lethal rule over hundreds of millions of people who are unable to feed their children or save them from easily preventable infectious diseases.   Hundreds of millions are beaten, imprisoned or murdered for resisting government oppression.  Or they are forced to leave their homes to avoid it.   Millions more are underpaid to boost business owners profits or share holders earnings.  Millions are driven from the family farms by drought or flood, or lose their homes from fire or recession.  Millions more are racially, religiously, ethically or sexually discriminated against.  Hundreds of millions are illiterate while millions more are grossly ignorant about the fundamental civilized nature of their cherished religious faith — or are so mentally imbalanced by hate or ideology that they offer their lives as suicide bombers or unquestioning soldiers. 

With the lethal threats of war, genocide, poverty, disease and ignorance persistently creating this multitude of disgruntled souls is it rational to believe we will remain safe and secure in a world with increasing access to affordable dual use technologies that are each capable of creating IEDs, mass chaos, or lethal WMD capacity? 

2. Parenting:  A child should not die before their parents.  The loss of a child, or even the fear of losing one is the most horrific of all human experiences.  Cultures that sacrifice their young to unworthy causes before their offspring have a chance to procreate only increase the probability of ending their genetic and cultural lineage. Parents willing to sacrifice their own life or comforts for the worthy cause of defending humanities freedom and security can increase the probability that their lineage and their culture will be sustained. 

3. Humanity:  We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all people are created equal and endowed at their creation with certain inalienable rights and among these is the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of health & justice for all. 

4.  Everything:  In the words of US CISA Director, our newest US federal agency “Everything is connected, everything is interdependent, so everything is vulnerable.... And that’s why this has to be a more than whole of government, a more than whole of nation [effort]. It really has to be a global effort....” Jen Easterly, Director of Cyber & Infrastructure Security Agency, Oct. 29, 2021. 

“If you know, come forth and speak.”  In an Igbo ancestral tribe language in southeastern Nigeria “Onyemalukwube” means this. 

In Partisan Politics how can you tell if a politician is lying?  If their mouth is moving. 


***********************


The seven “Fundamental Principles” of the Red Cross Red Crescent Movement.  These appear to exhibit some conflicting values and practices that are unsustainable.  If under closer analysis this assertion proves true, they should be reduced to simple principles…and not fundamental principles.   http://www.ifrc.org/who-we-are/vision-and-mission/the-seven-fundamental-principles/


Four fundamental ethical principles (a very simple introduction) :   http://web.mnstate.edu/gracyk/index.htm   

Minnesota State University Moorhead | 1104 7th Ave South | Moorhead, MN 56563 USA | 1.800.593.7246

The Principle of Respect for autonomy:   Autonomy is Latin for "self-rule" We have an obligation to respect the autonomy of other persons, which is to respect the decisions made by other people concerning their own lives. This is also called the principle of human dignity. It gives us a negative duty not to interfere with the decisions of competent adults, and a positive duty to empower others for whom we’re responsible.

Corollary principles: honesty in our dealings with others & obligation to keep promises. 

The Principle of Beneficence:  We have an obligation to bring about good in all our actions. 

Corollary principle? We must take positive steps to prevent harm. However, adopting this corollary principle frequently places us in direct conflict with respecting the autonomy of other persons.  


The Principle of nonmaleficence: (It is not "non-malfeasance," which is a technical legal term, & it is not "nonmalevolence," which means that one did not intend to harm.)  We have an obligation not to harm others: "First, do no harm." 


Corollary principle: Where harm cannot be avoided, we are obligated to minimize the harm we do. 

Corollary principle: Don't increase the risk of harm to others.

Corollary principle: It is wrong to waste resources that could be used for good.

Combining beneficence and nonaleficence: Each action must produce more good than harm. 


The Principle of justice:  We have an obligation to provide others with whatever they are owed or deserve. In public life, we have an obligation to treat all people equally, fairly, and impartially.

Corollary principle: Impose no unfair burdens.  Combining beneficence and justice: We are obligated to work for the benefit of those who are unfairly treated.

UNESCO:   Fundamental Principles: The Constitution of UNESCO establishes certain fundamental principles such as: Principle of non-discrimination ; Equality of opportunity and treatment ; universal access to education   ; Principle of solidarity.

http://www.unesco.org/new/en/education/themes/leading-the-international-agenda/right-to-education/normative-action/fundamental-principles/


Balance of Power (because power corrupts):  No environment is static. “Balance” is a human concept that is scientifically tough to defend.  Environments usually change gradually unless there is a human or natural  catastrophic event.  In most cases a general ‘balance’ in nature returns to a glacial pace of change.  Human advancements in technologies and a disrespect for nature change this.  And a consistent balance in power of our governing bodies is essential to sustaining a relatively balanced environment and human civilization.