Tuesday, December 22, 2020

Things Change. Can we?

 

Dear Editor,

Yes. Viruses change. That’s what all life does.   It should not be news that “the virus is mutating”  (Washington Post editorial “A wake-up call for the world” Dec. 22, 2020).   A new strain of the coronavirus was inevitable and predictable given the laws of nature – if…and that’s a huge if… one believes in the science of evolution.  This would be extremely helpful in waging effective defenses against many threats.  Some genetic changes can even be prevented - or anticipated thus preventing us from being sucker punched by another.

And that is why the Wuhan virus lab, and even some biosecurity labs here in the US are mucking around with viruses that are not yet a threat.   And that is why there was the possibility that the “Chinese virus” may have originated from a lab.  But in reality…that would have been monstrously foolish for the Chinese government to have released it intentionally. And, anyone who hypothesizes this silly idea obviously doesn’t know that the US actually created the vaccine we are now distributed in mass in the US  - one month before the first Covid19 death in the US was recorded.  WHAT?  Yes.  This is factual.  China shared the viruses genetic code as soon as they had it in early January.  Our scientists used it to rapidly create the vaccine, which required 9 months of testing for safe distribution.

The lessons learned from this brief bio lesson and Covid19 history are:

#1.  Trust nature’s living things to do what they have done for billions of years.  They adapt fast enough to a changing environment or they perish.

#2   Trust science to find the best answer fastest - if unimpeded by ignorant humans, intentional misleading news, bad laws, lack of political will, or insufficient budgets.     

#3.  Viruses don’t care about geographic borders, political parties or military/economic power.  They are just looking for a thriving piece of warm meat to continue their life cycle.  These electron microscopic pouches of life are designed by the threads of DNA or RNA code twisted within them.  The code (different in every life form) is read by other chemicals (enzymes) floating in their pouch – eventually creating more projectiles just like it…and sometimes slightly mutated.  Again, these tiny packets of information are immune to map lines, political ideologies, wealth, or military fire power.

#4.  To defeat them, and keep defeating them, we must first understand them.  Relying on guesses, political committees, or prayers are probably not going to work as well as the scientific method.

#5. Adequate political foresight in the form of government investments in research and development - will save more lives than building new weapons systems, another government bureaucracy, better banks, or beautiful churches.  Especially investments in preventing viral evolution by limiting three basic factors.  A)  toxic waste in the environment   B) exposure to wild animals, and C) unjust political principles that create enemies who will inevitably use bioweapons (which today is increasingly anyone seeking to do so) if all else fails to achieve their goal.

#6.  Preparing for the inevitable consequences of viruses that we may not prevent will save mountains of money in the long run.   And lives. 

#7.  Ignoring these lessons is typical of past human behavior.  And this will continue to be catastrophic in threatening cherished freedoms, vital security links, and prosperity.  And possibly not getting re-elected.

It is more than interesting that now, in 2020, parallel to this pandemic is the greatest hack in US cyber security history.

Its origin was a cyber virus.  Also a tiny bit of information that infected one or more commuters and then went viral penetrating deep into the nervous system of some 18,000 government agencies and private company’s around the world – including the State, Treasury, and Commerce departments; the Department of Homeland Security, NIH; and possibility even the Los Alamos National Laboratory and parts of the Pentagon. 

This was an intentional infection.  Again, tiny packets of information, impossible to see, yet profoundly powerful.  Given our national and economic dependence on these electronic systems for every aspect of our nation’s health and national security, it would be wise to follow the lessons learned above.  Especially, #7.  

Last and most troublesome is the existential threat that exists from both of these viral threats merging. The the hacking of our minds by Social Media algorithms.  Memes are much like genes.   If you have not yet seen “the Social Dilemma” documentary…it is a must.  But don’t believe the conclusion where the star of the documentary suggests that tweaking the technology can solve this problem.  The problem is we don’t change.  

Tweaking technology might work with nature’s bio threats.  But human engineered bio and cyber threats will require a transformational change in global governance and an evolutionary change in human minds.  Recognizing our global irreversible connectedness and interdependence -- and returning our minds to it’s original purpose of solving problems…instead of creating them. 

We create problems by arrogantly basing human laws on creative economic, political, religious and cultural ideas.   Human laws that ignore the Laws of Nature and Nature’s God.  The laws of nature should be obvious.  Now, so should the laws of Nature’s God, especially the idea about ‘do unto others’.  And the biblical story of the Good Samaritan! 

Competition between nations will not end well with 1) the evolution of weaponry, 2) a lack of change in our thinking, and 3) our ‘independent’ government systems that put national sovereignty above human sovereignty (our freedom, rights and security).   Life on this globe in space is interdependent on everything.  And everything is changing…except us.

No good will come from more inevitable mutations of the Covid-19 virus and the exponential change in technology - as they collide with the static forms of government.  Add to this inevitable wreck the human mind’s creative capacity to think anything, and then believe it, then defend that belief to the death, and even go so far as to kill for it (see nationalism, religion, and skin color ideologies).

Things change.  Can we?   

21 Best things in 2020?

 

Below is yet another Letter to the Editor that the Washington Post won't likely print.  Submitted the day the printed it.  No word from them yet. 


Dear Editor,

Your lead editorial’s list of “20 good things…in 2020” (Jan. 20, 2020) attempting to make lemonade out of lemons missed one.  At least 10 were directly linked to Covid19.   But the 'good' thing for those of us who have been warning about just such an inevitable mass casualty biosecurity crisis are now been relieved of that burden.  We no-longer have to waste our time warning and annoying others about the insanity of ignoring uncontested scientific studies, history, and our nation’s mental illness of cognitive dissonance.

The Post’s front-page lead on the same day properly assigned blame to Trump for our “Dark Winter”.  But ‘we the people’, who persistently elect (and too often re-elect) mostly lawyers instead of scientists, deserve the blame for a clearly dysfunctional government.  A government based on the flawed concept of ‘independence’ which exists nowhere in the known universe.  Building walls and powerful militaries cannot protect our nation’s freedoms, security, or prosperity with a Constitution based on such a dysfunctional foundation.  

Abraham Lincoln once wrote that our Constitution is a “frame of Silver” around our “Apple of Gold”.  Until we understand his words to mean that humanities freedoms and security are more important than US riches, we can expect more, and even greater biosecurity threats.  And if Covid19 does this, it will be the best of “good things” in 2020.

cw

Friday, December 18, 2020

IE2020 Awards Ceremony

Amazing! Simply inspiring! And only one arena remains were the genius of engineering must be applied. Engineering of a global governance system that is based on the same fundamental principles successes so far have been based on. The 'Laws of Nature and Nature's God"...protecting and restoring nature by applying the golden rule. Creating sufficient political will among all the world's policy makers to ensure sufficient resources are applied urgently to achieving all of the 17 SDGs ASAP won't be easy. But it can be done. And it is vital to effectively mitigating the root causes of the accelerating threats that now persist in putting the freedoms and security of ourselves and future generations at increasing risk. Now is the time for 'we the people', engineers and all others, to use the power of citizenship to build a movement to make this happen. And time is not on our side.


Wednesday, December 16, 2020

Do Black Lives Really matter?

 Do Black Lives Matter?  Of course they do!  But not equally for all people, in all nations, and in all newspapers.  According to the Declaration of Independence, the Bible, Quran, the Torah and every other major religion’s fundamental scriptures every human life matters.  What follows is a relatively detailed analysis of two major US newspapers with contrasting political agendas.

Context:  The mass atrocities of blacks in Africa are usually relegated to the back pages of major US newspapers, if they are covered at all.  Even during the growth of the Black Lives Matter movement in the US and at its peak.  But it was spreading to other nations as some papers indicated.

On December 16th, 2020  the news coverage from two different news papers did cover a renewed troubling trend in Africa (at least one of the trends).   Both the Washington Post and the Washington Times gave significant coverage of the kidnapping of “more than 330 students from the Government Science Secondary School in Kankara” Nigeria.  It occurred nearly a week ago.  

The Washington Times: Our nation’s largest and our nation’s capital’s largest conservative newspaper placed an Associated Press article on page A7 with about 20 inches of print column space and one picture (about 10 sq inches of graphics in one photo).  Together totaling about 13% of a full sized newspaper page.  It’s website didn’t list any reference to it on it’s long list off issues on the first screen. Looking under “World” news…again no link to this story scrolling down 24 stories. Moving to the next screen (#2) under “World” and 14 news stories…nothing.  And moving on to the last (#3) screen options there was nothing except 19 more news story links. 

Searching its website using the word “Nigeria” the story is found the third story down. 

Boko Haram claims abduction of students in northern Nigeria - Washington Times

But I was unable to get a story word count because of its subscription Popups…regardless of my having a paid paper and web subscription.

The Washington Post: The moderate Washington Post (liberal, socialist, lying newspaper according to the Washington Times) appeared significantly more interested in Africans that are still in Africa.

The WPost story received front page coverage, top of the bottom fold, and was continued on A-7 with a total word count of 1129 covering approx. 36 inches of print column plus over 100 square inches of graphics (three pictures and a map). Together these totaled approximately 70% of a full-sized newspaper page.

It was nowhere to be found on the Post’s leading webpage…unless you looked under “World” and then “Africa” and then scrolled one story down (under the ‘French Military use of Facebook’ to mess with Africa).  This story was covered by the Posts own in house journalist. 

I don’t think either paper would print this for obvious reasons.  For the Post it is too long.  For the WTimes it could be too embarrassing.  Or, for either, it might be because it’s about Blacks that don’t life in the US and their lives just don’t matter enough – to them, their readers, their advertisers, or maybe even the US BLM movement.

 

Sunday, December 13, 2020

This Election won't end on Monday!

 

The election’s not over!

It won’t end till the fat man swings.  And writing this, I’m thankful for words that can mean just about anything so I don’t get accused of threatening the life of the U.S. President. 

I could mean Trump swinging from being the king of lies, deception, and delusions to the very first US President who actually makes America great - by adhering to the fundamental principles expressed in this nation’s profound Declaration of Independence. 

Or, I could mean he and his wife getting caught swinging at sex party with the Vice President and his wife along with some gay Secret Service members…as some of my Russian friends have told me that Trump has actually done “in Russian hotels with Putin and his wenches”.

I’m sure many thought I meant swinging from the gallows.  But that would only be after his being convicted of treason by inciting 17 US states to succeed from our less than perfect Union.  Which could start after his predictable refusal accept the results of this election after the  Electoral College casts it vote this Monday.

Please understand. I do not blame Trump for the dysfunction of our Federation.  It was dysfunctional long before Trump was elected.  He just accelerated it.   I had actually stated I wanted Trump would win in 2016  - for two specific reasons.  First, he had a chance of fixing our broken government system which Hilary would have slowly worsened.  Or, Trump would quickly break it.  And then we could get on with properly fixing it so the global evolution of weaponry would not end life as we know it.   It’s obvious that both parties are oblivious to this accelerating power, affordability and accessibility of WMD options and their inevitable use by some rouge suicidal of apocalyptic extremists.   Both parties are more faithful to their creative partisan ideals than the timeless fundamental principles that this nation was founded on.  

 It is unfortunately logical that there would be a record turnout of US voters in 2020 who didn’t feel they have been seen, heard, or represented by key elected officials.  They would be both right and wrong in believing that.  Both truths are primarily due to their own selfish reasons for how they spend their time and money between US elections.  

Very few US citizens ever persistently petitioned our government for their grievances - except by holding rallies or protests.  These impassioned, mostly peaceful, but relatively rare events only generate media attention and social media exchanges that just accelerate our nation’s already growing ideological divide and dysfunction.

Then there is the fact that far too many God fearing - and God ignoring - Americans are more interested in protecting their own narrow self-interests or issues (legalizing pot) than looking out for the needs of other’s.  All, those ‘other’ people during this pandemic who are far less fortunate than them, especially those people in other nations with barely a pot to piss in, increasingly less food to put in a pot, or don’t even have a pot -- after being forced to leave their homes (if they even had one) due to war, famine, extreme weather conditions, or some extremely brutal/dysfunctional government. 

Last and not least, there is a mass of American voters, who don’t even vote, or who were easily distracted by their desire for senseless entertainment, overeating, wasteful consumption, and/or avoiding any real responsibility for the decline of God’s bountiful creation around them (and the world).  Those natural systems of the world that freely provides them with clean water, fresh air, abundant food, cheap resources, and largely predictable weather.

So no. The election is not over.  And elections alone will never solve our problems.  Our nation is not great (other than being great freaking mess) while having great ideals.  So what are left with an even more dysfunctional government than before.  Because we falsely believe that our freedoms and security can be protected while ignoring the freedom and security of nearly 7 billion other people in our human family who are 99.9% just like us genetically.  They just have a different nationality.   

What did we mean when we pledged allegiance to our flag and concluded our pledge with “one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and Justice for All”?

What does our Christianity mean when we ignore Jesus’s lesson of the “Good Samaritan?”

Unless you are an idiot, ignoramus, psychopath, influenced by the Devil, or the useless rhetoric of protecting our national sovereignty. …there is the only acceptable answer.   It can be found in

The Parable of the Good Samaritan:

Didactic story told by Jesus in Luke 10:25–37

 

 It is about a traveler who is stripped of clothing, beaten, and left half dead alongside the road. First a Jewish priest and then a Levite comes by, but both avoid the man. Finally, a Samaritan happens upon the traveler. Samaritans and Jews despised each other, but the Samaritan helps the injured man.

 

Luke 10:25-37

25 And behold, a lawyer stood up to put him to the test, saying, "Teacher, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?" 26 He said to him, "What is written in the Law? How do you read it?" 27 And he answered, "You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with all your mind, and your neighbor as yourself." 28 And he said to him, "You have answered correctly; do this, and you will live." 29 But he, desiring to justify himself, said to Jesus, "And who is my neighbor?" 30 Jesus replied, "A man was going down from Jerusalem to Jericho, and he fell among robbers, who stripped him and beat him and departed, leaving him half dead. 31 Now by chance a priest was going down that road, and when he saw him, he passed by on the other side. 32 So likewise a Levite, when he came to the place and saw him, passed by on the other side. 33 But a Samaritan, as he journeyed, came to where he was, and when he saw him, he had compassion. 34 He went to him and bound up his wounds, pouring on oil and wine. Then he set him on his own animal and brought him to an inn and took care of him. 35 And the next day he took out two denarii and gave them to the innkeeper, saying, 'Take care of him, and whatever more you spend, I will repay you when I come back.' 36 Which of these three, do you think, proved to be a neighbor to the man who fell among the robbers?" 37 He said, "The one who showed him mercy." And Jesus said to him, "You go, and do likewise."

In Luke 10, Jesus is asked "what is the most important commandment?" He responds that the greatest commandment is to "love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind" and the second to "love your neighbor as yourself".  Jesus was then immediately asked who counts as a neighbor and he responds with a parable or a story lesson that is an example for everyday life.

This is the story now pushed by Pope Francis in his latest Encyclical.  He provides answers that we may not want to hear.  But are essential to future of our nation, preserving our individual freedoms, and our collective security for generations to come.

Elections don’t really change what’s needed.   Adhering to fundamental principles can.

Thursday, December 10, 2020

Today! The most important day of the year? UDHR anniversary.

 

Dec. 10, 2020 is the 72nd Anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.  

A few days earlier the US daily COVID 19 deaths exceeded 3000  for the first time in this pandemic.  That’s more lives than we lost on 9-11…and this Covid19 record is likely to be broken again. Some believe this disease is “nature’s revenge”.  It's more of a lesson about the need to protect human rights.  

Viruses have always been our greatest threat.  Deaths and illness from most viruses are preventable.  But only if humans follow fundamental principles that we know work.  Clean water and safe sanitation alone would eliminate half of the world’s infectious diseases.  Eating healthy and literally being in touch with nature helps boosts the immune system.  Last and just as important, we must treat others as we want to be treated - as every major religion wisely suggests.  Christianity’s “Good Samaritan” parable and it’s plea for brotherhood of all religions was recently reiterated by Pope Francis in his latest Encyclical.  The world walking that talk would do much to prevent most of the violence in the world…wars, genocide, and violent extremism…along with the greatest tragedy known to humanity – the loss of one's child. An equally important threat to man is genetically targeted bioweapons.

We must have faith in science as well as the fundamental principle of the golden rule.  Yesterday was the 42nd anniversary of the global eradication of smallpox, arguably the greatest of all human achievements.  The smallpox virus took more lives in the first 70 years of the last century than all the wars, revolutions, genocides and homicides COMBINED in all the 100 years of that same century.  Science provided that vaccine.  Fraternity among humans (what the Pope is now calling for) opened the pathway for that vaccines delivery to every nation and village of the world.  We will need both again to defeat SARSCoV2. 

 Vaccines sometimes cause problems…but nothing as great as mistrusting them.  Or ignoring the value of “self-evident” “Truths” that we are all endowed with fundamental rights…and among these are the right to “Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness. These rights must be codified into human law.  I recently learned that Benjamin Rush, a doctor and one of the signers of the Declaration of Independence, was also close friends with Thomas Jefferson, that documents primary author.  Rush tried to convince Jefferson to use the word “health” in place of “Happiness”.   It should be no mystery why “One Health” is now the catch phrase to inform misinformed people that everything is connected.  Due to our continued disregard for nature and the poor, our exposure to others by the hyper speed of wealthy travelers or the treacherous paths of migrants due to war or climate related disasters is accelerating.  Walls and even the most powerful militaries in the world will not stop nature’s forces or the collective acts of billions of desperate people from invading every aspect of our lives -- and increasingly threatening both our freedoms and security.

Much of this could have been prevented had the UDHR been codified into a truly United Nations system.  And had the UN been given the resources and the power to actually enforce such a holistic list of inalienable human rights, instead of the rights of nations to do as they damn well please, the world would be far safer, freer, and more prosperous than ever.   The Pope recognized humanities need to globally adopt the “rule of law” and abandon the “law of force” that our nations and political leaders now worship.  That will take a movement of movements inspiring "We the people" of the world to convince policy makers that the supremacy of nationalism in the world is killing us, destroying the environment along with any chance of a livable and sustainable future for generations to come. 

Enforcing UDHR obviously didn’t happen and it won’t happen anytime soon.  But there is an achievable and affordable alternative.  Adequately fund the globally approved United Nation’s 17 Sustainable Development Goals - and achieve them by (or before) 2030.

Covid19 has made achieving those goals much more difficult.  But not impossible.  And funding them remains the greatest barrier given the economic demands now burdening every nation and nearly every human.   But “We the people” control the single factor that can change that.  Our God given sovereign power to create “political will” as world citizens.  The political will to first freeze and then seize some (or most) of the $32 trillion (according to 2012 study) that has been stashed in offshore accounts.  These are mostly illicit financial resources hoarded away by kleptocrats, oligarchs, criminal cartels, violent extremist groups and wealthy capitalists avoiding taxes.  Resources that rightfully should have been funding the protection of human rights.

Election outcomes are not the answer.  Even the best election outcomes in each nation will NOT change the trajectory of unsustainable problems.  Good laws can be blocked by uninspired or corrupted politicians.  They will also take refuge behind the flawed concept of national sovereignty.  A man made concept now over 400 years old which was once essentially a feudal system.  But today that flawed system is incapable of protecting any nation’s security or their people’s basic freedoms. 

The virus is evidence of that.  Enough said.  A mountain of irrefutable evidence won’t change someone’s mind.  That is because our minds are infected with cognitive dissidence and conspiracy theory memes.

On this very special day be thankful for your rights.  All of our inalienable rights.  These rights and your security are increasingly at risk because ‘we the people’ have become dependent and unquestioning regarding the flawed political concept of independence.  It is nothing more than a mental construct that exists only in our minds and on paper.  It is found nowhere in the known universe…
We are free to believe anything we want.  And we do!  But we will never be free of the consequences. 

This is a fundamental principle that we must now act on.  Reality cares not what you think or believe.  It is only what we collectively do that matters.  And time is running out. 

Words like Liberty and Justice for all, should mean something.  Words should mean something specific. 

A new scientific study warns that the “Tension between awareness and fatigue shapes COVID-19 Spread”.  https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/12/201208111438.htm

This report errs in using the wrong word in framing our reality.  It is not our “fatigue” that is shaping the outcome of this viral spread.  It is the fatigue of health workers, supply chain delivery people, and those engineering and producing safe vaccines.  The rest of us are mostly bored in our homes, on Zoom calls, or using social media to spread conspiracy theories or other memes (metal obelisk in the Arizona desert) that distract us from being aware of reality. Or just distracted by video games, Netflix binging (I’m guilty), and social media wars where words can mean anything and defend anyone's ‘truth’ or sacred belief.  

But, words and phrases must mean something specific to be useful.  Inalienable Rights!  Right to life!  Right to Liberty!  Right to happiness (unlikely if unhealthy).  But “Peace through strength?”, “Capitalism or market forces will solve the problem?”,   “Tweaking democracy will make the difference.”  Our imagination and creativity are literally killing us.   And with the evolution of weaponry and war…our time is short.   Until we engineer our global political system using words and phrases that mean something sane and that people mostly agree on - just as those who engineer space craft, vaccines, and global communication devises do -- this current acceleration of chaos, suffering and deaths will continue.

Action is needed now on what we know to be “self-evident” “Truths”.  Not more discussion, debate, or experiments. 
We've always known what to do.  We just resist doing it.  Mostly due to flawed concepts. 

Wednesday, December 2, 2020

Public Health post tRump. We still face a biosecurity existential threat and others

 

Dear Editor,

Michael Gerson’s Washington Post op-ed “Public Health efforts that survived the Trump era” on World AIDS Day (December 1, 2020) offered a nearly comprehensive detailing of Trump’s impact on public health.  But any future book would more accurately be titled “Negligent Homicide”. 

While offering “a chapter” on our GOP policy makers commendable efforts to avoid the defunding of vital domestic and global programs is warranted -- more enlightening would be a chapter on how any of our  ‘whole of government’ efforts has a massive hole in it.   Our existing federal government and global governance systems (and structures) persist in preventing massive avoidable deaths here and abroad  from multiple causes.   The greatest cause being from public health failures linked to ‘independent’ systems and structures.  Easily affordable and implementable basic health care investments need to be made across issues and borders in order to meet vital goals, but insufficient to ensure our individual freedom and security.   A wise investments in just clean water and safe sanitation alone would eliminate half of all the world’s infectious diseases, saving hundreds of millions of lives, billions in tax payer dollars, and create healthy markets for worthwhile global economic progress.  But that’s just one essential health investment.  Failing to effectively mitigate Covid19 will undo most progress made in water and sanitation if the people who run those systems don’t show up for work.  

 Single bold targets have been set and achieved before.  The greatest example is the global eradication of Smallpox in the 70s.  A onetime US investment of $30 million over ten years saved US taxpayers over $17 billion (according to a 1997 GAO study).  Today that savings would be tripled.  Up until Smallpox’s global eradication in the last century, that virus had killed more people than all the wars, revolutions, genocides, and homicides in that entire century combined.   It didn’t stop environmental destruction or create world peace.

Covid19 is unlikely to kill as many Americans as the 1918 flu -- but another raging pandemic will inevitably come -- via nature, human error, global apathy, or murderous intention.  And it could be far worse.   Prevention is vital!   It is the best one-word summary of ‘Public Health’.  Warp speed reactions to health problems (or any problem) are admirable, but wisdom is profoundly more useful and cheaper.

Public health requires other preventive investments as well.  Like sustainably protecting humanities very life support systems (nature) and our global means of governing all spaces on earth and even in space.

In that context I hope Mr. Gerson will convince all those in leadership positions (ONE, US Global Leadership Coalition, or the incoming Biden Administration…) to make fully funding the 17 Sustainable Development Goals their highest local, national, and global priority.   No need to raise taxes. According to a 2017 Washington Post article “Five myths about Kleptocracy”, By Natalie Duffy and Nate Sibley (both researchers at Hudson Institute’s Kleptocracy Initiative) a 2012 report suggests there is at least $32 trillion available in private offshore accounts.   https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/five-myths-about-kleptocracy/2017/01/04/42b30d72-c78f-11e6-8bee-54e800ef2a63_story.html 

 

 

The UN’s democratically created and globally approved list of 17 goals is the only comprehensive solution humanity has ever considered -- since the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights (December 10th is its 72 anniversary).  That post war genius was thwarted when the war’s victors created a United Nations – a united effort - and kept the protection of nation state sovereignty supreme to the protection of fundamental human rights. 

We know the result of our own nation making that same error in its creation.  A bloody civil war five decades later killing more Americans that all the wars our nation has fought in since then  -- combined.  Our federation’s original sin still plagues us today.  It appears we are waiting for yet another major war to confirm that putting state sovereignty above human rights is a fundamental flaw.

Today, our failing to achieve the holistic and inseparable SDGs by 2030 will undoubtably thwart the possibility of any future effort to form a more perfect union…intended to preserve our most cherished freedoms and essential security.  Why?  Our independent nation’s incapacity to deal with the global exponentially accelerating power, affordability, and availability of every technology.  And, every technologies unalterable capacity to do unprecedented good -- or existential harm.  We may already be out of time.

Twenty years ago Woody Allen joked, ‘Humanity stands at fork in the road. One path leads to utter hopelessness and despair.  The other, to complete annihilation.’  He hoped we ‘had the wisdom to choose the right path’.   For the past 5 years the SDGs have offered another path.  Pope Francis’s recement encyclical recognizes the SDGs as humanities chance to take that path by following the golden rule.   

And, if anyone hasn’t yet watched the new Netflix documentary “The Social Dilemma” - they owe it to future generations to watch and listen carefully to its warnings of just social media being an “existential threat.”  Then you must resist the concluding suggestion of the genius tech experts.  While willingly and regretfully detailing their unanticipated mistakes in creating ‘social media’ platforms - with the intention of bringing us all together (while making a profit) - some still believe that just tweaking the technology, (or somehow controlling it) will yield the end result that most of humanity wants.  This fits the definition of insane.  Doing the same thing over and over… it’s just crazy.  

The documentary does end with a increasing self-evident truth offered 40 years earlier by the technologist and futurist Buckminster Fuller.  “Whether it is to be Utopia or Oblivion will be a touch-and-go relay race right up the final moment…Humanity is in ‘Final exam’ as to whether or not it qualifies for continuance in Universe” Buckminster Fuller.

And if anyone is serious about humanity working together in passing this test - Bucky also offered the pathway.  “You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.”   – R. Buckminster Fuller

FYI:  When drafting the Declaration of Independence, Dr. Benjamin Rush (a signer of the Declaration and a good friend of Thomas Jefferson) suggested that Jefferson use the word “health” instead of “happiness” as the end goal of any sustainable government.

Thomas Paine’s 1776 pamphlet Common Sense summarized the primary purpose of any government as maximining human freedom and security.  “Wherefore, security being the true design and end of government, it unanswerably follows that whatever form thereof appears most likely to ensure it to us, with the least expense and greatest benefit, is preferable to all othersHere then is the origin and rise of government; namely, a mode rendered necessary by the inability of moral virtue to govern the world; here too is the design and end of government, viz., freedom and security. And however our eyes may be dazzled with snow, or our ears deceived by sound; however prejudice may warp our wills, or interest darken our understanding, the simple voice of nature and of reason will say, it is right.  Thomas Paine, Common Sense. 1776

And even before that 1667 John Locke’s An Essay Concerning Toleration implied sustainable health in his words, “That the whole trust, power, and authority of the magistrate is vested in him for no other purpose, but to be made use for the good, preservation, and peace of men in that society over which he is set, and therefore that this alone is and ought to be the standard and measure according to which he ought to square and proportion his laws, model and frame his government.


What we must acknowledge is at the heart of each of these thinkers and revolutionists (including the Pope who quotes Jesus and more current wise souls) is that we know what to do. We always have.  We have even pledged “liberty and justice for all” many times.   But we just keep making the same mistakes again and again.  There’s a word for that.  

 

We must change.  Now! 

 

 

 

 

Monday, November 23, 2020

Pope Francis' latest encyclical

 

A plan that would set great goals for the development of our entire human family nowadays sounds like madness.”  Pope Francis' in his latest encyclical "Fratelli Tutti (All Brothers and Sisters):  On Fraternity and Social Friendship."

http://www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/encyclicals/documents/papa-francesco_20201003_enciclica-fratelli-tutti.html

Unfortunately… few people even know of the comprehensive 17 Sustainable Development Goals.  Goals that would bring the human family together for a stable and sustainable future – and prevent so many of the threats we face today.

 

Why is this great set of goals so ignored by people committed to making the world work?


Because they are UN goals? 

Because the goals were created by “we the people” of the world and agreed on by nearly every nation?

 Or, because people have their own favorite, or different goals and priorities?

Anyone got an answer?

cw

Wednesday, November 11, 2020

Armistist Day

 Nov: 11:   Veterans Day, Armistice Day, and National Education Day:


Shred the U.S. Constitution!   That was the sentiment of government experts burdened with the secret job of America’s recovery had there been a catastrophic event during the Cold War.  Mostly former U.S. government officials - these experienced individuals were driven by the possibility of a nuclear war and the hope of rebuilding our nation after it - or some other catastrophic event destroyed life as we know it.  

Astonishingly they named the Declaration of Independence as the document worthy of protection.
It housed the fundamental principles essential for creating any sustainable human system of government dedicated to human freedom, the fundamental promise of America’s future.

Abraham Lincoln recognized as our nation was close to dissolving over slavery.  The bloody civil war killed that followed killed more Americans than both world wars, North Korea, and Vietnam wars combined.   Lincoln called the Declaration of Independence our “Apple of Gold” and our Constitution it’s “Frame of Silver”.   Our pledge of “Liberty and justice for all” reflects the same.  Having persistently failed this pledge Americans have been engaged in war after war, multiple proxy wars, an endless war against a tactic (terrorism) and now a cold war against ourselves deeply divided by mental constructs that appear incapable of coexisting. The sustainably of democracy itself is as much in question as our pandemic driven debt and our consumption driven destruction of our planets life support system. 

Today, November 11th was originally celebrated as Armistice Day.  The day that 'the War to end all Wars' abruptly ended (with 20 million dead). In light of Covid19 people should know that more US soldiers died from the so called "Spanish Flu" than from the war itself.  Some historians believe that this disease prevented the US President from attending the drafting of the Treaty of  Versailles thus setting the profoundly unjust conditions that led Hitler to power and the second World War II and approximately 50 million dead. 

It wasn't until the Korean War that Congress changed the holiday to Veterans Day to honor only American veterans.  The ideal of permanently ending war was largely lost to two prevailing but flawed passions; ‘peace through strength’ and ‘peace by disarmament’.  Neither had a chance in hell of working given the fundamentally flawed global system of unenforceable international law.  Flawed because it persisted in worshiping national sovereignty over the protection of fundamental human rights.  

National sovereignty was a useful concept 400 years ago with the Treaty of Westphalia preventing the slaughter of lives within a states border.  But it never stopped or even slowed the slaughter of millions in wars between nations.  Without just and enforceable rules and regulations to hold governments accountable for their murderous actions inside or outside their borders, chaos increasingly continues to reign supreme to this day.  And the lethal forces of poverty, economic disparities, political repression, and environmental destruction we are seeing a return of slaughter within nations between government and rebellious forces.  Conditions made worse by Covid19's exposure of both our broken national and global systems of government.  

Put simply, protecting national sovereignty remains the world’s highest priority instead of fighting Covid19 by  providing and protecting fundamental human rights...like the right to primary healthcare services, clean water, sanitation, gainful employment, safe housing, and  a basic education.  And ‘we the people’ continue to accept this believing that closing borders will solve the problem.

Even after the horrors of World War II (50+ million war dead, Nazi genocide killing 6 million innocent people , and the creation of a new bomb that could vaporize 100,000 people in seconds) we prevented a profound effort to prevent future wars from being codified.  

FDR’s wife Eleanor Roosevelt led the global effort intended to remedy the injustices that often lead to war.  She drafted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights which was was unanimity’s approved on Dec. 10th, 1948 (exactly 72 years ago, 30 days from today). Unfortunately, the UN was never given the power to enforce it. 

Within a few years the Cold War began and over the next four decades over 100 million innocent men, women, and mostly children died from easily preventable malnutrition and infectious diseases while hundreds of billions were spent on weapons to prevent war.  Nuclear weapons may have prevented another hot world war but on Sept 11, 2001, 19 individuals armed with razor knives used our own passenger airliners as WMD.  That crime against humanity sparked a global war that continues today costing Americans trillions, along with trillions more being spend in reaction to Covid19 which is now killing about 100 times more Americans a year than Al Quade has killed in 20 years. 
And when today’s extremists acquire tactical efficiency in biological, chemical, nuclear, cyber or robotics technology millions of Americans will likely die. We must find another way of ensuring out security without losing our freedoms.  And time is NOT on our side. 

It should now be self-evident that the most powerful military in the world cannot stop the abuse of technology or protect the most powerful man in the US, our President.  If a person, group or nation is determined to commit mass murder (some willing to die in the process) or a virus arrives accidently or intentionally...we are all at risk.   

Fact is that global US military involvement since 9-11 has created more murderous extremist than existed before 9-11 and conditions that facilitated the spread of Covid19 and other destabilizing factors.  And our most capable and honorable military force will not be able to stop a biological weapon from entering our nation or truck bombs from obliterating our public buildings.  A cyber-attack or EMP event affecting our vulnerable infrastructure could also cause mass murder.  A 2018 GAO study of our militaries most sophisticate weapons systems reported that 80 percent were hackable by relatively simple methods. 

Security is increasingly an illusion.  Even without President Trump's pre and post election antics our Constitution is incapable of protecting our freedoms, our lives, or our sustainable prosperity.  
Any serious effort to detect and preempt a domestic attack will likely violate our 4th Amendment.  And, with domestic ‘terrorism’ now increasing, this must be painfully clear.   The freedom/security dilemma can only be resolved by looking beyond our individualistic culture.  It will requires deeper thinking beyond our primal fears. 

Educating ourselves about the evolution of weaponry and war itself would cause us to fundamentally change how we calculate the costs of war.   It should no longer be calculated in terms of lost blood and treasure.  We can now lose civilization as we know it.  In reality, this has existed for decades.   After the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki Albert Einstein was asked ‘which weapons would WW III be fought with?’  Einstein wisely answered that he didn’t know.   But he was certain that “WW IV would be fought with sticks and stones.” 

Exponential advances in every technology now yields unprecedented killing capacity to almost anyone with a serious grudge and enough money to buy a car, truck or computer.   The dual use nature of every technology means that any disarmament effort can easily be overcome with human creativity if the will is there to commit mass murder.  Even without the Second Amendment.   Take guns away and cars or trucks can be used to slaughter dozens.  Timothy McVeigh demonstrated this 27 years ago in Oklahoma City with a driver’s license, a rental truck, fuel oil, fertilizer, some coper wire, and a timer.

The factor of ‘dual-use technology’ alone should fundamental shift our approach to war, peace, and security.  Intentional mass murder is not the only, or even the greatest threat we face as Covid19 has demonstrated. Climate extremes, super volcanoes, asteroids, and now Artificial Intelligence are also inevitable threats to both our freedom and security.  

For possible anwers.  https://globalchallenges.org  

Most discussions today about any national security threat the word ‘resilience' is stressed.  Meaning we are unlikely to prevent them given limited government funds, the constraints of our Constitution, and the abhorrent dysfunction of our elected policy making bodies.

Those who study ‘war’ or ‘peace’ need to get schooled rapidly regarding the fundamental causes of both.  Nothing less will end the inevitable budget breaking costs and accelerating trajectory of weapons or war.   Too many “peace and justice” activist refuse to yield on their decades long ambition to cut military spending, stop arms sales, and their fetish for the ‘elimination of nuclear weapons’.  And those who champion “peace through strength” need to realize that security is not a function of more and better weapons.  Lasting security is a function of ‘Liberty and justice for all’.   This is the prerequisite to improving any and every element of our human condition.  It's common sense and even biblical in origin. 

And, too many in our government are still clueless to our nation’s vulnerabilities and continue to pass laws that violate the “Laws of Nature and Nature’s God” so profoundly referenced in our Declaration of Independence.  

In this context the education of all Americans is the most vital element essential to our national security.   And unknown to most Americans this was the weighty conclusion of the last report offered by a bi-partisan Presidential Commission on National Security in the 21st Century.  It was released just six months before the attacks on Sept. 11, 2001.   It considered a lack of education in the US as the second greatest threat to our nation, behind terrorism.   The ignorance of tens of millions of our nation's voters is yet more evidence. 

When we think about honoring veterans or celebrating this anniversary of the end of WW I (and the coming 72th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights December 10th) it would be good to remember why President Kennedy’s created the Peace Corps.  He knew the foundation of peace.  Since its creation over 220,000 Americans have served in it rising their lives in villages and hamlets around the world to bring education, health care, and farming to the poor.  They deserved to be honored as much as military veterans.  Many of which actually tried and died trying to perform such vital services while deployed in Iraq, Afghanistan, and throughout Africa.   

Many rightfully debate the value of having our military do 'nation building'.  And our best military leaders say if we don’t fund more humanitarian efforts we need to “buy more bullets”.

Fundamentally, ‘we the people’ need to urgently redefine what is meant by national security.  And then invest heavily in how it will be achieved.   We must use our Constitution to address the root causes of war, disease, genocide, hunger, poverty and other global injustices.  We must put people first, not our national pride.   That is the biblical concept that helped create our great nation.  Failing it, we will fail to be great.  Or even exist as a nation given the evolution of weaponry, war and the fragility of democracy.

The foundations of peace and security were recognized and articulated 40 years ago in a bipartisan Presidential Commission on World Hunger.   “In the final analysis, unless Americans -- as citizens of an increasingly interdependent world -- place far higher priority on overcoming world hunger, its effects will no longer remain remote or unfamiliar.  Nor can we wait until we reach the brink of the precipice; the major actions required do not lend themselves to crisis planning, patchwork management, or emergency financing... The hour is late.  Age-old forces of poverty, disease, inequity, and hunger continue to challenge the world.  Our humanity demands that we act upon these challenges now...” 

The commission specifically warned that “The most potentially explosive force in the world today is the frustrated desire of poor people to attain a decent standard of living. The anger, despair and often hatred that result represent real and persistent threats to international order…  Neither the cost to national security of allowing malnutrition to spread nor the gain to be derived by a genuine effort to resolve the problem can be predicted or measured in any precise, mathematical way. Nor can monetary value be placed on avoiding the chaos that will ensue unless the United States and the rest of the world begin to develop a common institutional framework for meeting such other critical global threats as the growing scarcity of fossil fuels and other non-renewable resources, environmental hazards, pollution of the seas, and international terrorism. Calculable or not, however, this combination of problems now threatens the national security of all countries just as surely as advancing armies or nuclear arsenals.”

The commission also stated “that promoting economic development in general, and overcoming hunger in particular, are tasks far more critical to the U.S. national security than most policymakers acknowledge or even believe. Since the advent of nuclear weapons most Americans have been conditioned to equate national security with the strength of strategic military forces. The Commission considers this prevailing belief to be a simplistic illusion. Armed might represents merely the physical aspect of national security. Military force is ultimately useless in the absence of the global security that only coordinated international progress toward social justice can bring.”

Today, the only thing (other than the 2nd coming of Christ) to comprehensively address global injustices is the 17 Sustainable Development Goals.  Achievable goals every nation agreed to in 2015.  Funding them can be done without increasing any debt to any government.  Doing so would actually save trillions of dollars and billions of lives.   All that is missing the political will of your elected officials to make it happen.

Even if you never voted...the most important thing to do now as a citizen is to educate those in power on what our priorities should be.   Their job is to represent you/us.   They swore to protect the Constitution.  But without putting the protection of human rights first...it cannot protect us.  We must fulfill our individual and founders promise of liberty and justice for all.   Right now, the best way of doing that is achieving the 17 SDGs.

See the web (of life).
Insist on justice for all (17 Sustainable Development Goals). 
Or prepare for the catastrophic consequences (some are already here)

Sunday, August 2, 2020

Democracy sucks. Always has. Always will. There is an alternative.

Democracy is not a fundamental principle:

Democracy is a human concept.  It is a word with many definitions.  But there is none that can ensure a sustainable set of government systems and structures within any nation - or set of nations in a world where the protection of national sovereignty remains supreme to the global protection of universal human rights.

Any governing system engineered by the majority vote of a largely ignorant population will be at best, largely dysfunctional.  And then, inevitably doomed given the evolution of technology and its increasing complexity in an irreversibly interconnected and interdependent world that most human minds are incapable of understanding or accepting.

In a book review of “Twilight of Democracy: The Seductive Lure of authoritarianism” By Anne Applebaum (Wpost 7-26-20) https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/the-everyday-decisions-that-undermine-democracy/2020/07/23/691fb72c-c078-11ea-b178-bb7b05b94af1_story.html  Sheri Berman ( Barnard College political science professor) provides a context of the book and her review suggesting we there will always have “the long-standing struggle between democracy and dictatorship.” 

This is true if we hold democracy as our primary guild star for any government architecture.

Why?  Because democracy is inherently flawed as well as fragile in any form.   

Berman concludes “Its survival depends on choices made every day by elites and ordinary people.” The books author, Anne Applebaum writes “There is no road map to a better society…no didactic ideology, no rule book.  All we can do is choose our allies and our friends…..with great care, for only with them, together, is it possible to avoid the temptations of the different forms of authoritarianism.”

Hogwash!  Both the author and reviewer are under the mindspell of the Beltway status quo, the source of pay checks and long term employment.  This status quo persistently ignores the reality that it worships a 400 year old concept called national sovereignty in a modern, irreversibly and increasingly hyper connected and interdependent world.  And believe beyond any rational evidence national sovereignty is the best protector their freedom and security and thus their prosperity and sustainability.  

This largely unexamined illusion is killing us by the hundreds of millions each year in the form of wars, genocides, infectious diseases, terrorism, revolutions, international crimes, pollution, climate extremes, and natural disasters that national borders and independent national policies cannot prevent, fiscally respond to, or effectively prevent.  

Why?  Because ‘independent’ government systems based on the will of their majorities short term interests are incapable of dealing with an irreversible and increasingly interdependent world.    Each ‘majority’ invests endlessly in protecting the illusion that that legally authorized political borders will shield them from both natural global realities and the unprecedently powerful and globally invasive technological systems and structures that humanity has created to boost our individual economic and/or military power.  

A majority of humanity and our leaders have forgotten the fundamental principle that sovereignty resides in individuals, not nations.  And unless ‘we the people’ of this bountiful world enlighten ourselves and our leaders to the fundamental reality that ‘united we stand’ a chance…and, divided we will fall…even fail as a species.   We all share this unbelievably unique planet with one another.  We all have the same basic needs.  And the vast majority has the same desire.  To maximize our freedoms and security.  Thomas Paine projected this in his Common Sense pamphlet over 250 years ago.  Protecting human freedom and security is the only legitimate role of government. 

The great news is that there is a rational and proven alternative to the insanity in believing democracy or dictatorship is our only choices.  It is called “the Rule of Law”.  You will hear this phrase used frequently in defending many actions of our own government.  But rarely does anyone define it or insist on all three of its fundamental elements.   Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy once gave the best definition I’d ever heard.  He was speaking on C-Span to a group of international visitors and was asked “what makes the Rule of Law effective”.  He said it requires three basic elements.  First, the laws need to be made and enforce by a democratic process.  People need to know their voices and votes matter and the laws are applied.   Second, the laws need to be applied equally to everyone.  There needs to be a perception of justice.  Last.  The purpose of the laws must be protective of basic human rights.  If these are ignored, don’t expect stability.   For laws to work best all three elements are needed.   

Our founding father’s offered another fundamental principle in the Declaration of Independence.  The “Laws of Nature”  If we fail to follow these or the laws of “Nature’s God” don’t expect a government to work or to last.  The phrase “Nature’s God” may be rejected by many religion skeptics.  But any rational being will know that the fundamental tenant of every major religion is the golden rule.   There’s a reason for that.  Even lowly animals will react violently if abused. 

Pick your poison!  A democracy, republic, federation, or dictatorship…none last.  Each has and will likely continue to perpetuate injustices (preferring one group over another) or violate fundamental human rights (basic freedoms we all need to survive and thrive). 

It is up to us, we the people’, to insist that any future form of government we seek, must effectively protect ‘liberty and justice for all’.   Not just pledge it.

 

 

 

 

NOUN

1.     a system of government by the whole population or all the eligible members of a state, typically through elected representatives.

"capitalism and democracy are ascendant in the third world"

synonyms:

representative government · elective government · constitutional government · popular government · self-government · government by the people · autonomy · republic · commonwealth

·         a state governed by a democracy.

"a multiparty democracy"

·         control of an organization or group by the majority of its members.

"the intended extension of industrial democracy"

·         the practice or principles of social equality.

"demands for greater democracy"

synonyms:

independence · self-government · self-determination · self-legislation · self rule · home rule · sovereignty · autonomy · autarky · self-sufficiency · individualism · separation · nonalignment · emancipation · enfranchisement · manumission

 

·  Democracy | Definition of Democracy by Merriam-Webster

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/democracy

Definition of democracy. 1 a : government by the people especially : rule of the majority. b : a government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation usually involving periodically held free elections.

·  Democracy | Definition of Democracy at Dictionary.com

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/democracy

Democracy definition, government by the people; a form of government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised directly by them or by their elected agents under a …

·  Democracy - Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy

·         Overview

·         Types of governmental democracies

·         Characteristics

·         History

·         Theory

·         Measurement of democracy

·         Non-governmental democracy

·         Justification

Democracy has taken a number of forms, both in theory and practice. Some varieties of democracy provide better representation and more freedom for their citizens than others. However, if any democracy is not structured to prohibit the government from excluding the people from the legislative process, or any branch of government from altering the separation of powers in its favour, then a branch of the system can accumulate too much power and destroy the democracy.

Wikipedia · Text under CC-BY-SA license

·  DEMOCRACY | definition in the Cambridge English Dictionary

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/democracy

the belief in freedom and equality between people, or a system of government based on this belief, in which power is either held by elected representatives or directly by the people themselves. politics & government. A democracy is a country in which power is held by elected representatives.

·  Democracy - definition of democracy by The Free Dictionary

https://www.thefreedictionary.com/democracy

1. government by the people; a form of government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised directly by them or by their elected agents under a free electoral system. 2. a state having such a form of government. 3. a state of society characterized by formal equality of rights and privileges.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy