Dear Editor,
Jonathan Alter’s superb detailing of “major” problems with
the current Carter/Biden “analogies” (https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2022/01/14/jimmy-carter-biden-comparisons/)
missed two profoundly important Carter contributions. Commission reports that could have radically
improved the increasingly chaotic world we have today if they had been popular
reading. First is the foresighted
conclusion and warnings of President Carter’s 1980 bi-partisan Commission on
World Hunger. It stated “In the final analysis, unless Americans -- as citizens of an
increasingly interdependent world -- place far higher priority on overcoming
world hunger, its effects will no longer remain remote or unfamiliar. Nor can we wait until we reach the brink of
the precipice; the major actions required do not lend themselves to crisis
planning, patchwork management, or emergency financing... The hour is
late. Age-old forces of poverty,
disease, inequity, and hunger continue to challenge the world. Our humanity demands that we act upon these
challenges now...”
It then warned that “The most potentially explosive force in the world today is
the frustrated desire of poor people to attain a decent standard of living. The
anger, despair and often hatred that result represent real and persistent
threats to international order… Neither
the cost to national security of allowing malnutrition to spread nor the gain
to be derived by a genuine effort to resolve the problem can be predicted or
measured in any precise, mathematical way. Nor can monetary value be placed on
avoiding the chaos that will ensue unless the United States and the rest of the
world begin to develop a common institutional framework for meeting such other
critical global threats… Calculable or not, however, this combination of
problems now threatens the national security of all countries just as surely as
advancing armies or nuclear arsenals.”
It then recommended “that promoting economic development in general, and
overcoming hunger in particular, are tasks far more critical to the U.S.
national security than most policymakers acknowledge or even believe. Since the
advent of nuclear weapons most Americans have been conditioned to equate
national security with the strength of strategic military forces. The
Commission considers this prevailing belief to be a simplistic illusion. Armed
might represents merely the physical aspect of national security. Military
force is ultimately useless in the absence of the global security that only
coordinated international progress toward social justice can bring.”
This should have been Alder’s
expose’s conclusion on MLK Day’s Washington Post Outlook section. Along with the predictions listed in Carter’s
Global 2000 Report ...which nearly all eventually proved accurate - and are now
a “painful ‘what if’” for us and the rest of humanity.
“Before you finish eating breakfast in the
morning, you've depended on more than half of the world. This is the way our
universe is structured; this is its interrelated quality. We aren't going to
have peace on earth until we recognize this basic fact of the interrelated
structure of all reality.”
Martin Luther King, Jr.
No comments:
Post a Comment