Monday, April 17, 2023

TIMES100 are not the influencers we need.

 Dear Time editors Edward Felsenthal and Sam Jacobs,

Time’s 100 Global honorees are certainly wonderful, creative, intelligent, inspiring, and deeply committed people globally.  But they were not “the world’s most influential people.”  Even collectively they did little to stem the accelerating chaos in our increasingly insecure world.   Those who were most influential were either ignoring, unintentionally allowing, or intentionally fueling the root causes.  Many of our seemingly irresolvable insecurities were, in reality, easily affordable and preventable.  Humanity has always had the resources and the solutions.  We just lacked the political will to do what was needed and evidenced by a 1980 bipartisan Presidential Commission on ending world hunger. 

It clearly warned* of the threats Americans and humanity would face if we failed to end the worst aspects of widespread hunger and poverty by the year 2000.  We didn’t.  And the world we see today has more “diseases” (infectious, chronic, and mental), “international terrorism” (and domestic), “war” (edging toward another world war), “environmental problems” (long list), and “other human rights problems” (refugees, genocide, homeless, human trafficking, torture, rape, beheadings…). 

The most influential people have been those of us who’ve been ignoring the inevitable and catastrophic costs in blood, treasure, and sustainability of believing that the protection of national sovereignty and corporate wealth is more important than the global protection of inalienable human rights and nature - the fundamental infrastructure (systems and structures) of all living things.

In your introductory “Behind the list” you wrote  “this year's first gathering of TIME100s, in Davos, Switzerland the overarching theme was the conferences of interconnected challenges...”   But everything is connected!!!   “Everything is connected, everything is interdependent, so everything is vulnerable.... And that’s why this has to be a more than whole of government, a more than whole of nation [effort]. It really has to be a global effort....” Jen Easterly. CISA director.  Oct. 29, 2021. [the Cyber and Infrastructure Security Agency is our nation’s newest federal agency established by the Trump Administration in 2018].

And the rise of Trump and other populist/authoritarian leaders globally is the direct consequence of every ‘independent’ nation’s persistent failure to adequately address the irreversibly interconnected and interdependent global problems that are impervious to border controls or independent domestic agencies.  The rise of middle-class suffering in most nations has only stimulated growth in nationalistic  anti-globalist views.  Within this ‘us vs them’ paradigm more democracy is not the answer.  More global justice is. What the vast majority of humans want on this planet is to sustainably maximize their own freedom and security.   In Thomas Paine’s pamphlet Common Sense, that is the only legitimate purpose of government.

 

 

 

*Its commissioners specifically warned ...“The most potentially explosive force in the world today is the frustrated desire of poor people to attain a decent standard of living. The anger, despair, and often hatred that result represent real and persistent threats to international order… Neither the cost to national security of allowing malnutrition to spread nor the gain to be derived by a genuine effort to resolve the problem can be predicted or measured in any precise, mathematical way. Nor can monetary value be placed on avoiding the chaos that will ensue unless the United States and the rest of the world begin to develop a common institutional framework for meeting such other critical global threats… Calculable or not, however, this combination of problems now threatens the national security of all countries just as surely as advancing armies or nuclear arsenals.”  They also stated “that promoting economic development in general, and overcoming hunger in particular, are tasks far more critical to the U.S. national security than most policymakers acknowledge or even believe. Since the advent of nuclear weapons, most Americans have been conditioned to equate national security with the strength of strategic military forces. The Commission considers this prevailing belief to be a simplistic illusion. Armed might represents merely the physical aspect of national security. Military force is ultimately useless in the absence of the global security that only coordinated international progress toward social justice can bring.”  

Today’s world is experiencing the consequences of ignoring this commission’s warnings. And combined, these global pressures have fueled the anti-democratic populist movements thriving today.  Independent governments' “self-interests” can no longer be more important than humanity's potential to thrive.

Our failure to make the protection of human rights and our environment superior to the protection of national sovereignty and corporate power is the primary problem.   And national elections won’t stop the current systems of government that are failing us.  Without prioritizing “the Laws of Nature and Nature’s God” there isn’t enough money in the world to address all the suffering that’s coming and is directly linked to so many unsustainable local and global trends that are reactionary in nature.  Prevention is key. And preventing these accelerating trends will require a comprehensive global action plan.  An affordable and achievable plan exists today:  the 17 UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).  No organization has yet taken a leadership role in building a Movement of Movements needed to bring all progress-focused organizations and movements together.   Time is not on our side. The evolution of pathogens, weapons, war, corruption, environmental distresses, and growing economic disparities and debt are outpacing our will to voluntarily change our governing systems. This is literally…globally unsustainable.  Leadership on this is urgently needed.   Which organization will rise to the occasion?  Will TIME100 ever promote these fundamental influencers?

 

No comments:

Post a Comment