Nov: 11: Veterans
Day, Armistice Day, and National Education Day:
Shred the U.S.
Constitution! That was the sentiment of
government experts burdened with the secret job of America’s recovery had there
been a catastrophic event during the Cold War.
Mostly former U.S. government officials these experienced individuals were
driven by the possibility of a nuclear war and the hope of rebuilding our
nation after it or some other catastrophic event destroyed life as we know it.
Astonishingly
they named the Declaration of Independence as the document worthy of protection.
It housed
the fundamental principles essential for creating any sustainable human system
of government dedicated to human freedom, the fundamental promise of America’s
greatness.
Abraham
Lincoln recognized as much when our nation was close to dissolving over
slavery. That bloody civil war killed
more Americans than both world wars, North Korea, and Vietnam wars
combined. Lincoln called the
Declaration of Independence our “Apple of Gold” and our Constitution it’s “Frame
of Silver”. Our pledge of “Liberty and
justice for all” reflects the same. Having
failed this pledge Americans have been engaged in war after war and proxy
wars. And are now in a permeant war that
will not end well for us.
Today, November
11th was originally celebrated as Armistice Day. The day that the War to end all Wars abruptly
ended (20 million dead). It then
politically ended unjustly with the treaty of Versailles thus setting the
conditions leading to World War II. It
was after that war and the Korean War that Congress changed the holiday to
Veterans Day to honor only American veterans.
The ideal of permanently ending war was largely lost to two prevailing but
untested passions; ‘peace through strength’ and ‘peace by disarmament’. Neither
had a chance in hell of working given the fundamentally flawed global system of
unenforceable international law. Flawed
because it was and remains a system worshiping national sovereignty. It was a useful concept 400 years ago with the
Treaty of Westphalia, but it has never stopped or even slowed the wars between nations.
Without just and enforceable rules and
regulations to peacefully hold governments accountable for their murderous
actions inside or outside their borders, chaos continues to reign supreme to
this day. Put simply, protecting national sovereignty
remains the world’s highest priority. Protecting human rights is rarely taken seriously.
And ‘we the people’ accept this without
question or pause.
Even after
the horrors of World War II (60 million war dead, Nazi genocide killing 6
million innocent people , and the creation of a new bomb that could vaporize
100,000 people in seconds) we allowed a profound effort to prevent another war
from being put into place.
FDR’s wife Eleanor
Roosevelt led the effort intended to remedy the injustices that often lead to
war by drafting the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It was unanimity’s approved on Dec. 10th,
1948 (exactly 70 years ago, 30 days from today). But the UN was never given the
power to enforce it. Within a few years
the Cold War began and over the next four decades over 100 million innocent men,
women, and mostly children died from easily preventable malnutrition and
infectious diseases while hundreds of billions were spent on weapons to prevent
war. Nuclear weapons may have prevented
another hot world war but on Sept 11, 2001 just 19 individuals armed with razor
knives used our own passenger airliners as WMD, and sparked a global war that
continues today, with no end in sight. It
has so far cost trillions of American tax payers dollars and twice as many
American lives as the 9-11 attack itself. And, when today’s extremists acquire tactical
efficiency in biological, chemical, nuclear, cyber or robotics technology
millions of Americans will likely die.
We must find another way and time is NOT on our side.
By now it
should be self-evident that the most powerful military in the world cannot stop
the abuse of technology -- when a person, group or nation is determined to
commit mass murder (some willing to die in the process). And the fact is that global US military involvement
since 9-11 has created more committed murderous extremist than existed before
9-11. Don’t believe that our most
capable and honorable military force will be able to stop a biological weapon entering
our nation or truck bombs from obliterating our public buildings. A cyber-attack or EMP event affecting our
vulnerable infrastructure could also cause mass murder. A recent GAO study of our militaries most
sophisticate weapons systems reported that 80 percent were hackable by
relatively simple methods.
We fail to
realize that security is essentially an illusion if someone is committed to
death or destruction. Making matters more difficult is our
Constitution. Any serious effort to
detect and preempt a domestic attack must inevitably violate our 4th
Amendment. With the recent rise in
domestic ‘terrorism’ this must be painfully clear. The
freedom/security dilemma is real. Resolving
it requires deeper thinking beyond our primal fears. We can start by thoroughly understanding the
evolution of weaponry and war itself which should fundamentally change how we
calculate the costs of war. It should
no longer be calculated in terms of lost blood and treasure, but possible losing
civilization as we know it. And, this reality
has existed for decades. After the
bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki Albert Einstein was asked ‘which weapons would
WW III be fought with?’ Einstein wisely answered
that he didn’t know. But he was certain
that “WW IV would be fought with sticks and stones.”
Exponential advances in every technology now yields
unprecedented killing capacity to almost any one with a serious grudge and
enough money to buy a car, truck or computer.
The dual use nature of every technology means that any disarmament effort
can easily be overcome with human creativity if the will is there to commit mass
murder. Even without the Second
Amendment. Take guns away and cars or trucks can be used
to slaughter dozens. Remember what
Timothy McVeigh did 25 years ago in Oklahoma City with a driver’s license,
rental truck, fuel oil, fertilizer, some coper wire, and a timer.
This single factor of ‘dual-use technology’ alone should fundamental
shift our approach to war, peace, and security.
Intentional mass murder is not the only, or even the greatest threat we
face. Pandemics, global warming, super
volcanoes, asteroids, and now Artificial Intelligence are also grave threats to
our freedom and security. If you doubt
this read Global
Catastrophic Risks 2018 https://globalchallenges.org/en/our-work/annual-report/annual-report-2018
Yet our government’s war budging priorities and procedures have
only escalated. Today we are spending
more on defense (still more than the 7 next largest national military budgets
combined most of those nations are our allies) and budgeting for a Space Force
with the possibility of putting nuclear weapons in space. Few
policy makers question the opportunity costs of relying on weapons to protect
us, while our capacity to prevent other threats we know will come and deal more
effectively with those we can never really prevent. Most discussions about any national security
threat now stress the word ‘resilience.
Meaning we aren’t going to be able to prevent them given the limited
funds our government has, the constraints of our Constitution, and the
abhorrent constipation of our elected policy making bodies.
Those who study ‘war’ or ‘peace’ need to get schooled
rapidly regarding the fundamental causes of both. Nothing less will end the inevitable budget
breaking costs and accelerating trajectory of weapons and war. Too many
“peace and justice” activist refuse to yield on their decades long ambition to cut
military spending, stop arms sales, and their fetish for the ‘elimination of
nuclear weapons’. And those who champion
“peace through strength” need to realize that security is not a function of
more and better weapons. Lasting
security is a function of ‘Liberty and justice for all’. This
is the prerequisite to improving any and every element of our human condition. It’s even biblical in origin.
And, too many in our government continue to pass policies
without a serious consideration of our nation’s vulnerabilities and our unyielding
global dependence on the “Laws of Nature and Nature’s God”, so profoundly
stated in our Declaration of Independence.
In this context the education of all Americans is the most
vital element essential to our national security. Unknown to most Americans this was the
weighty conclusion of the last report offered by a bi-partisan Presidential
Commission on National Security in the 21st Century. It was released just six months before the
attacks on Sept. 11, 2001. It considered a lack of education in the US as
the second greatest threat to our nation, behind terrorism.
When we think about honoring veterans or celebrating the 100th
anniversary of the end of WW I this November 11th (and the coming 70th
anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights December 10th)
it would be good to remember or learn about President Kennedy’s creation of the
Peace Corps. He knew the foundation of
peace and since its creation over 220,000 Americans have served in it. They also risked their lives in villages and
hamlets around the world to bring education, health care, and farming to the
poor. They deserved to be honored as much as military veterans, who many today
actually try to perform such vital services while deployed in Iraq,
Afghanistan, and throughout Africa. Many rightfully debate the value of having our
military do nation building but our best military leaders say if we don’t fund
more humanitarian efforts we need to “buy them more bullets”.
Fundamentally, ‘we the people’ need to urgently redefine what
is meant by national security and how it will be achieved. The
answer lies more in how we use our Constitution to address the root causes of
war, disease, genocide, hunger, poverty and other global injustices. We must put all people first, not our
national pride. That is the biblical concept that helped create
our great nation. Failing it, we will
fail to be great, or even exist as a nation given the evolution of weapons and
war.
The foundations of peace and security were recognized and
articulated 38 years ago in a bipartisan Presidential Commission on World
Hunger. “In the final
analysis, unless Americans -- as citizens of an increasingly interdependent
world -- place far higher priority on overcoming world hunger, its effects will
no longer remain remote or unfamiliar.
Nor can we wait until we reach the brink of the precipice; the major actions
required do not lend themselves to crisis planning, patchwork management, or
emergency financing... The hour is late.
Age-old forces of poverty, disease, inequity, and hunger continue to
challenge the world. Our humanity
demands that we act upon these challenges now...”
The commission specifically warned that “The most potentially explosive force in the world today is
the frustrated desire of poor people to attain a decent standard of living. The
anger, despair and often hatred that result represent real and persistent
threats to international order… Neither
the cost to national security of allowing malnutrition to spread nor the gain
to be derived by a genuine effort to resolve the problem can be predicted or
measured in any precise, mathematical way. Nor can monetary value be placed on
avoiding the chaos that will ensue unless the United States and the rest of the
world begin to develop a common institutional framework for meeting such other
critical global threats as the growing scarcity of fossil fuels and other
non-renewable resources, environmental hazards, pollution of the seas, and
international terrorism. Calculable or not, however, this combination of
problems now threatens the national security of all countries just as surely as
advancing armies or nuclear arsenals.”
The commission also stated “that
promoting economic development in general, and overcoming hunger in particular,
are tasks far more critical to the U.S. national security than most
policymakers acknowledge or even believe. Since the advent of nuclear weapons
most Americans have been conditioned to equate national security with the
strength of strategic military forces. The Commission considers this prevailing
belief to be a simplistic illusion. Armed might represents merely the physical
aspect of national security. Military force is ultimately useless in the
absence of the global security that only coordinated international progress
toward social justice can bring.”
Today, the only thing other than the 2nd coming of Christ
to comprehensively address global injustices is the 17 Sustainable Development
Goals every nation agreed to in 2015.
Funding them can be done without increasing any debt to any
government. Such funding options will
be explained in the days to come.
Affordable, achievable, and nationally agreed upon solutions exist. All that is missing the political will of
your elected officials to make it happen.
If you voted for them or not, or voted at all, the most
important thing we can do as a citizen is to educate those in power on what our
priorities are. Their job is to
represent you/us. They swore to protect
the Constitution. It will not protect
you. It is far more important that we
all fulfill our individual and founders promise of liberty and justice for all. Right now, our best way of doing that is
achieving the 17 SDGs.
See the web (of
life).
Insist on
justice for all (17 Sustainable Development Goals).
Or prepare for
the catastrophic consequences (Global Catastrophic Risks 2018
https://globalchallenges.org/en/our-work/annual-report/annual-report-2018).
No comments:
Post a Comment