Friday, March 25, 2022

This shit has to stop now!

 If the term ‘national sovereignty’ is to mean anything regarding peace and security for any people, government, or nation it must be enforced globally.  Now!

It’s been over a month of unwarranted killing and war crimes in Ukraine since Putin ordered his “special operation” on February 24th.  Playing nice with diplomacy should have ended two weeks ago.  Putin, his generals, and the Russian people need to be told that this war is going to end on civilization’s terms.  Not Putin’s.  And if they expect to live with any level of comforts in the future, they must support this special civilized operation now.

They must convince Putin to halt his operations within a day or remove him from power within a week.  If not, a non-nuclear war to protect the civilized world (and the concept of national sovereignty) and to fully liberate Ukraine and its people will begin. 

Non-nuclear NATO forces and other lifesaving assets from any other nation united in this cause will begin flowing into Ukraine.  The concept of Mutually Assured Destruction remains in effect with the intention that no other nation will violate the long-standing concept of National Sovereignty - as flawed as it has been in protecting inalienable human rights and the environment.  

This united special mission will be to push all Russian military forces out.  Resistance will be met with lethal force.  From this point on, anyone (President, general, or soldier) from any nation, who is suspected of committing a war crime, genocide, or a crime against humanity will be put on trial in the Hague.

Here are the civilized world’s non-negotiable and enforceable terms if these conditions are not met:   

Every Ukrainian region occupied by Russia since its independence in 1991 will be returned to Ukraine’s government and its people.  All people residing in these areas will be protected by a United Nations Peace Keeping force that will not require UN Security Council approval.

Any and all destruction caused by Putin’s special operation since Feb 24th and any destruction in Ukraine going into the future will be charged to Russia and its oligarchs for rebuilding.

Sanctions on Russia will increase and continue until this demand is met.

Hypersonic missiles, cyber, biological, or chemical weapons will be no match for the world’s nations that are united in protecting the concept of national sovereignty.  This global concept has been so flawed in the past that it has been unable to sustainably protect the freedoms and security of people anywhere.

If Armageddon is to come then Putin, Russia’s Generals, and everything Russian will be forever cursed by any lucky souls that survive and whatever civilization might follow.

If Putin and the Russian people are committed to this destiny.  Let it be theirs. 

Wednesday, March 16, 2022

No-fly zone alternative. War is not the Answer. Neither is Peace.

 War is not the answer. Humanity must knowledge this given the evolution of weapons and war. But “Peace” is not the answer either. Human security based on ‘Liberty and Justice for all’ is. 

Some parties and their followers believe in "Peace through strength’.  WMD did ensure there was not another World War for 70 years (excluding the Global War on Terrorism).  But now WMD is being used as blackmail in waging a hot war in Ukraine. And terrorizing the population with his military assets as its tactic.

Putin’s seeks peace in the slaughter of Ukrainians and ending their freedom to choose their own leader.  Putin's peace depends on everyone capitulating to this slaughter of thousands of innocent people until they come under his rule. 

The only way to stop a bad man with a powerful army and nuclear weapons is a virtuous nation with a courageous leader using its freedom and military assets to ensure Ukraine's protection.   We must assist them in building an iron dome.  And if Putin persists break away from traditional diplomacy and international law that essentially protects national sovereignty above human rights or the environment.  Offering Ukraine nuclear weapons so MAD can ensure their survival is out of the question. 

But if we truly believe Ukraine is an independent country and Ukrainian voters have chosen its political leader there is a non-violent alternative to offer Putin to end these war crimes. 

President Biden could do what President Zelenskyy requested.  "Be the leader of peace".   He could do this by sending an open communication to Putin and all the world leaders with his plan to personally deliver 1000 stinger missiles in Airforce One to the Ukrainian Freedom fighters in Kyiv with the assistance of the 82nd Airborne division.  Perhaps the House or Senate leader of the Republican party would like to demonstrate their courage and love of freedom by joining him in the flight of mercy.  

And if Biden or any Americans are killed in our "special military operation" approval has already been passed by Congress (assuming they are also truel freedom lovers) that the US would launch an equivalent response in Moscow delivered with non-nuclear cruise missiles to Putin’s suspected location. And this will continue until he decides to halt his special operations in Ukraine. This leaves the threat of escalation to MAD on Putin and his legacy.  Biden and Putin could both be seen as heroes who saved the world along with protecting Putin's mistress and his bloodline hiding in Switzerland. It would need to come with a promise that Putin would not be tried for war crimes and maybe a few other perks. 

If both the US and Russian federations agreed on this 'peace through justice' concept. It might be possible for all the world's governments to agree on a similar form of justice.  Where the protection of human rights and the environment is put ahead of the protection of a nation's right to do whatever it pleases, whenever it pleases, to whomever it wants within its own borders.  And do it anywhere around the world if they have nuclear weapons. 

This is the current global paradigm we swim in without recognizing the lethal flaw with nations allowed to put their own special interests above the interests of future generations in every nation. 

Without changing this fundamental flaw in global governance lacking justice and accountability, we have only postponed MAD and many other ways that our unsustainable, short-term thinking, and other harmful trends will inevitably curtail human freedom and security for all.  

This is the way our species has a chance of getting beyond the certain cataclysmic end of the accelerating evolution of weapons, war, pathogens, and environmental degradations.   

It's either global security, liberty, and justice for all…or nobody!


Monday, March 14, 2022

Today's "Hunger Hurricane" warning by the UN Secretary-General


https://www.cyprusmedianet.com/news/34960/war-in-ukraine-may-spark-hunger-hurricane-and-collapse-global-food-system-guterres/

This is NOT another “Energy Crisis”.  It’s another NFL* crisis.  (Nobody freaking listens...!)

Long-term solution:  Divest from fossil fuels ASAP.

Short-term solution:  Put a bounty on Putin. 

*NFL:  Nobody Freaking Listened.... or learned, from the last energy crisis or world hunger warnings during the Jimmy Carter Presidential Administration.   

Our nation’s addiction to Middle East oil and other carbon-based fuels had the benefit of accelerating our economic progress and use/abuse of other resources.  The ‘progress’ however forward an unbalanced, unjust, and inherently unsustainable global civilization.   It was predictable.  And had been predicted for decades.  

Our nation’s Middle East foreign policy was focused on US national security’s need for oil.  Specifically, cheap gas prices for protecting our freedom to do whatever we liked with our polluting energy.  This short-term thinking fueled and funded terrorism while accelerating the damage to humanity's life support infrastructure- the environment.   We knew it then and ignored it.  We know it now and we are still resisting necessary change.

The term “energy independence” should be barred from our language.  First, it’s not about energy.  There is no shortage of energy and never will be.  E=MC2.  There’s just a shortage of wisdom. Our desire for ‘cheap’ energy hooked us on fossil fuels absent of any serious consideration of the associated economic, health, environmental, and national security consequences. Each with astounding economic costs and consequences that future generations would be burdened by.

If it were possible to tally up the real costs in blood and treasure of the Global War on Terror (which is still climbing) and the environmental costs associated with disastrous extreme weather events, the health costs of air pollution, mining, microplastics, lead poisoning, and other toxic elements associated with converting oil into multiple uses --  it would far surpass the costs of keeping the solar panels on the White House and successfully weaning ourselves from fossil fuels since being removed in the mid-1970s.

Thus, the word “independence” is an invented concept that has created a cutlural mental illusion.  It exists nowhere in the known universe.   Even if the US required no other outside source of fossil fuel and relied only on nuclear,  solar, wind, waves, and geothermal... the rest of the world would still rely on fossil fuel and the US would still suffer from most of the downsides of its global use.  Just not as fast.   

It’s insane that our nation still has non-energy efficient homes and offices  That’s unconscionable. That nearly 40 percent of Americans are obese from overeating and not eating healthy while probably more who are unwilling to walk or ride a bike a short distance - is even more costly and shortsighted.  If you don’t understand the connection between obesity and our addiction to fossil fuels you simply don’t know how much oil is needed to produce the unhealthy food we eat or the additional fossil fuel energy needed to carry you around in a 3000 lb vehicle or used in the food processing and supply chain that gets it to the store you will shop in. 

So, the price of gas is now higher than it has been since 1980.   Boohoo!  Back then, over 40,000 innocent children under the age of five were dying each DAY from easily prevented malnutrition and hunger-related infectious diseases.   Today, innocent people are dying in a war that might lead to thousands of more deaths from hunger and disease globally.  And that war could come to an earlier conclusion if Americans were willing to sacrifice just a little in paying more at the gasoline pump.

Those now demanding that we pump more oil out of the ground here now to stabilize gas prices or lower them to hurt Putin are selfish fools.  This reaction is not going to help Ukrainians or hit Putin in the pocket for at least a year.   By then many other global consequences will be set into motion.

Our societal addiction to profits, comforts, feeling good, and looking good has sidelined most of our fundamentally human aspirations of doing good and being good.  In a nutshell, our society is selfish and sick.  It has yielded multiple unsustainable trends, like debt, war, global warming, corruption, more terrorism, more Covid19 variants, and global chaos will only worsen even without the war.

The US and NATO should spare no time in putting an end to this war.  Establishing a ‘no-fly zone’ may not seem worth the risk but Putin will not stop until he owns Ukraine.  And the human and economic cost to Ukraine, Mother Russia, and much of the rest of the world will be unbearable.  As the UN Secretary-General said today.  The world is facing a “hunger hurricane”.  And it will have multiple global consequences.

Hopefully, sooner than later the Russian people will wake from Putin’s lies and his reign of Kleptocracy and insanity will end - without risking WW III.   

Putin’s invasion is inevitably his own death wish.  Humanity cannot take the chance that he is bluffing in his willingness to use his hypersonic nuclear weapons if anyone interferes with his fantasy of recreating the Soviet Union.  The civilized world should immediately offer a bounty of $100 billion on his head, dead or alive.  It will save trillions of dollars and potentially millions of innocent lives in the long run.

Any guard, soldier, hooker, oligarch, chambermaid, cook, diplomat, doctor, or wife that takes him out would instantly become wealthy and humanity's greatest hero.  The taker might not survive doing so, but they would be credited with saving civilization.  For now.  What a great legacy!   

Because if someone doesn’t there is better than a 50/50 chance they are going to die anyway. If Putin pushes the MAD button or starves half the world nearly everyone globally will pay a price.  

We still have superpowers today and superpower wannabes.  But now with advances in multiuse technologies, we also have superpowered individuals.  People or a very small group with access to any number of weapons, poisons, or infectious agents could put an end to one life.   Who wouldn’t make such a choice with the intention of saving tens of millions?   Sometimes the end can clearly justify the means.

And, If you believe the warning of the ‘Hunger Hurricane’ is overblown please read the summary quotes below.  They are from a 1980 bipartisan Presidential Commission on World Hunger.   If your mind has not been changed you will qualify for the 2022 Cognitive Dissonance Darwin Award.

In 1980 a bipartisan Presidential Commission concluded  “In the final analysis, unless Americans -- as citizens of an increasingly interdependent world -- place far higher priority on overcoming world hunger, its effects will no longer remain remote or unfamiliar. Nor can we wait until we reach the brink of the precipice; the major actions required do not lend themselves to crisis planning, patchwork management, or emergency financing... The hour is late. Age-old forces of poverty, disease, inequity, and hunger continue to challenge the world. Our humanity demands that we act upon these challenges now...” Presidential Commission on World Hunger, 1980.

Its commissioners specifically warned ...“The most potentially explosive force in the world today is the frustrated desire of poor people to attain a decent standard of living. The anger, despair, and often hatred that result represent real and persistent threats to international order… Neither the cost to national security of allowing malnutrition to spread nor the gain to be derived by a genuine effort to resolve the problem can be predicted or measured in any precise, mathematical way. Nor can monetary value be placed on avoiding the chaos that will ensue unless the United States and the rest of the world begin to develop a common institutional framework for meeting such other critical global threats… Calculable or not, however, this combination of problems now threatens the national security of all countries just as surely as advancing armies or nuclear arsenals.”

They also stated “that promoting economic development in general, and overcoming hunger in particular, are tasks far more critical to the U.S. national security than most policymakers acknowledge or even believe. Since the advent of nuclear weapons, most Americans have been conditioned to equate national security with the strength of strategic military forces. The Commission considers this prevailing belief to be a simplistic illusion. Armed might represents merely the physical aspect of national security. Military force is ultimately useless in the absence of the global security that only coordinated international progress toward social justice can bring.”

Today’s world is experiencing the consequences ignoring this commission.  It specifically warned about about increases in “diseases”, “international terrorism”, “war”, “environmental problems” and “other human rights problems” (refugees, genocide, human trafficking…). Inevitable and predictable threats to our lives, our freedoms, and our prosperity.   Combined, these global pressures fueled the anti-democratic populist movements thriving today.  Largely due to independent governments interests being more important than humanities potential to thrive and survive in the face of these current trends.

Time is not on our side. The evolution of pathogens, weapons, and war is outpacing our will to voluntarily change our governing systems. This is literally…globally unsustainable.

 

Sunday, March 13, 2022

Our Age of Consequences is unsustainable.

 “At the root cause of our problems is the failure to recognize that Independence is a man-made concept. The truth of our reality is that everything is connected to everything and therefore, everything impacts everything.  Every action impacts the whole. Mobilized is firmly rooted in this natural law.”  Chuck Woolery

Every day is a new story of systematic breakdown, of tragedy, a shooting, a broken system, the election of an incompetent sociopath, a social media fiasco, or media companies at war with each other.  It’s a constant struggle to keep up with it all.

We feel like screaming from the roof “What the F%&K is going on here?”   Or, we can go down the rabbit hole and discover the root cause–the epicenter of most of our inherent, continual, and seemingly unsolvable problems.

What follows is a blog Mobilized released a few years earlier.  It is even more relevant now.  Some edits have been made and a few recently relevant events added.  Please share it with others if you find it useful

The Age of Consequences of Systematic Failure: Our existing situations are not problems. They are Consequences

By Chuck Woolery, Former Chair, United Nations Assn., Council of Organizations (not the TV host!) and Steven Jay, Creative Director, Mobilized

Summary:  After the Great Depression and the end of WWII the general sense of the common good generated by these global calamities gradually disappeared from public discussion.  With the exception of some civil rights activities that did yield important civil progress things have gotten worse. And most agee, things are going to worsen more, before they get better.  This is an examination into why things have gotten worse. And how we must change to change things for the better. 

 America’s success in the world and our fear of Communism helped fuel individualism, greed, and selfishness (the illusion of individual separation from the whole). This largely un-examined mindset eclipsed the ‘united we stand’ American character. It was an aberration of logic, compassion, and empathy that basically steamrolled American politics into the train wreck we have today. Recently, technology greatly accelerated this dysfunctional trend.  A trend that had been well established by a largely unregulated capitalist system that had spread the dangerous meme of independence globally for the past few decades.

The tragic and lethal consequences are now around us everywhere in the US and abroad.  And instead of recognizing our collective mental flaw that got us here, and confronting it, many people have doubled down on their narratives.  They want to make America Great Again or finance a Green New Deal to bring back the comforts, prosperous conditions, and selfish culture that tragically nurtured our disconnect from reality. The fundamental truth that “United We Stand” - still stands. And divided we are going to fall.   This time it will be a hard fall. One we may not recover from.

·         Trump is not the problem. He’s a consequence. …

·         Climate change isn’t the problem. It’s a consequence.

·         Unprecedented obesity rates, opioid deaths, mass shootings, and suicide rates are not health emergencies. They are consequences.

·         Flint, Michigan’s contaminated water, Honeybees’ Colony Collapse Disorder, Florida’s red tide... these are not environmental problems. They’re consequences.

·         The continuing violence in Afghanistan, Yemen, and Syria are all consequences.

·         The Russian/Ukraine dilemma threatening nuclear Armageddon or the use of biological/chemical weapons with the potential to spark a hot World War III. 

·         Radical extremism, WMD proliferation, and China/Russian cyber hacks are now top national security threats.  Again, the consequences of a poorly engineered global governance system. 

·         Growing economic inequality, fake news, and loss of privacy are not dilemmas.

They are all consequences.

·         These, and most of the other problems we are now encountering at a breakneck pace in newspapers and in our lives are the inevitable consequences of our thinking and actions.  They were not however inevitable.

 

A picture containing text, nature, mountain

Description automatically generatedThey are the result of our collective failure to do what we know is needed to prevent such problems.

“Human behavior is the greatest threat to human existence"  Dr. Monty G. Marshall

 

All Americans have solemnly pledged dozens, if not hundreds of times, “Liberty and Justice for all”. But our desire for comfort, wealth, distractions, popularity, and freedom comes with all too real life and death consequences.

Americans love freedom. It is all we really have.  But freedom also comes with consequences.   Some freedoms have arguably been worth the cost of hundreds of thousands of American lives and trillions of our tax dollars. But it has been our overindulgence in freedom without the responsibility that is the fundamental cause of our (and the world’s) growing list of profoundly dangerous, destructive, unhealthy, increasingly lethal, and persistent consequences. Unsustainable consequences were predictable and often warned about.  Costly consequences that were, and remain, related to a simple conceptual flaw within our mental calculations.

We believe and then act out of that belief that we are independent.  We are not.  Yet, as Americans, we reinforce that sentiment every 4th of July.   In reality, it is only a concept that doesn’t exist anywhere in the known universe.  And it has zero accurate applications here on earth.  Our Declaration of Independence should have been titled the Declaration of Political Separation.  Not as catchy!  But powerfully accurate.

It has been and remains our unyielding faith in, allegiance to, and reflexive defense of this flawed human principle that has mentally disconnected us from much of our personal, civil, environmental, social, health, and economic responsibilities. Like Neo in the Matrix, we all sense something isn’t right… but can’t see the truth;

Every aspect of our lives is dependent on other people, the environment, our nation’s laws, other nation’s laws, and most importantly, the “Laws of Nature and Nature’s God” which is expressed in the first paragraph of the Declaration of Independence.

“Everything is connected, everything is interdependent, so everything is vulnerable”... “this has to be a more than whole of government, a more than whole of nation [action]. It really has to be a global effort.”   CISA (the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency) Director Jen Easterly  (Oct. 29, 2021)

The growing mass of undesirable consequences that threaten our freedom, security, and prosperity were as inevitable as they were unintentional. But they are only self-evident when we are honest with ourselves about reality.

Our Founding Fathers understood reality as “Truths to be Self-Evident” based on the “Laws of Nature and Nature’s God”. Their catastrophic error was failing to codify this wisdom into their new government blueprint — the U.S. Constitution. The consequence was a civil war that killed more Americans than all the wars our nation has fought in since then, combined. And some of those consequences remain with us today.

Far more Americans will die from preventable causes in the years ahead related to global factors SUCH AS terrorism, pandemics, climate change, wars, and poverty because the systems and structures that our Constitution protects today on both the national and international levels still fail to codify the wisdom of “liberty and justice for all” in a world of irrefutable and irreversible interdependence.

Interdependence is accelerating due to the advances in technology that are accelerating exponentially.  During the same time, our government’s capacity for change (or adaptation to change) has virtually stopped.  And in some areas, it has actually reversed.

Even before Trump was elected a survey of US national security experts put our own nation’s “government dysfunction” as the second greatest threat to our national security.  Just behind terrorism.  It was higher than, China, Russia, Iran, N. Korea, and Climate Change.  Pandemics were not on the list.

The illusion of Independence underlies most of our short-term thinking, long-term planning, slow policymaking, and reactive actions.

 

We assume without question our personal, budgetary, institutional, and national independence. The endless war against terrorism (a tactic that cannot be defeated) has only accelerated our loss of freedoms (including privacy) and security. Our modern world of unprecedented and increasingly powerful, affordable, and ubiquitous technological capacity for WMD creation – and the increasing difficulty in accurately attributing the identity of the attacker, put everything increasingly at risk.

Imagine the loss of lives, freedom, and prosperity from a bioterrorist attack or global pandemic far worse than Covid19 or the 1918 Flu epidemic.  Unlike nuclear war, such a biosecurity threat is inevitable. Yet we remain lethally unprepared for a catastrophe that will NEGATIVELY affect every system and structure in our bodies, our homes, our economies, and the world.
We have based our policies on our illusion of independence - instead of obeying nature’s fundamental principles that are used in science and technology to engineer things that work like magic.  Medicine, instant global communications, electrical appliances, and tools that work to save and protect life, while making our lives more comfortable, profitable, and secure.

It is our flawed human assumption of independence that leads us to abuse or misuse many of these amazing science and technology tools -- that results in the creation and exacerbation of many of our current health and environmental problems.  Sometimes with catastrophic results.  But easily preventable problems if we had followed the laws of nature and nature’s God.

If you doubt this read the preamble of the U.S. Constitution.  As you do, offer a school grade to each of the five clearly stated intentions to form “a more perfect Union.”

Then consider the fact that Abraham Lincoln wrote that our “Declaration of Independence” is our “Apple of Gold” and our “Constitution” is its ‘frame of silver’.  Yet our elected officials swear an oath to protect the Constitution believing without reservation that it will protect our freedoms and security.  How’s that working out?

Now imagine a government that is engineered on the fundamental principles offered in the Declaration of Independence. A government that … soundly embraces and promotes the responsibility of inclusion with ‘liberty and justice for all’, globally.


Stay Informed. Be Empowered. Build the New.
Sign up for free and become a collaborator in better together.


 

Some have asserted that the primary fundamental principle in both the laws of nature and nature’s God is justice. Note that the foundation of every major religion is the Golden Rule.  To do unto others as you would have them do to you.   Anyone experiencing an injustice doesn’t need to be a religious believer to understand the supreme value of this.  Our US Justice Department offers two quotes engraved in its exterior stone.

“Justice is found in the rights bestowed by nature upon man. Liberty is maintained in security of justice.”  And “Justice is the great interest of man on earth. Wherever her temple stands, there is a foundation for social security, general happiness and the improvement and progress of our race.”

Yet our federal (and lower) systems and structures of justice are profoundly unjust. They are in fact “legal” systems in which it is better to be guilty and rich than innocent and poor. Many of our laws are simply unjust.   And unacceptable injustices can also be found in our nation’s economic, electoral, education, healthcare, agriculture, military, foreign policy, and intelligence systems.

Is it really any wonder that things don’t work, that Trump has so many followers, wars persist, the environment is trashed, and our society is ailing?


Every time I witness another failing in our nation, a phrase I heard last year comes to mind;  “How healthy can we be if we are well-adjusted to a profoundly sick society?” We are afflicted with a societal mental illness;  Before Covid, the Surgeon General rated ‘loneliness” as our nation’s greatest health risk.   Our mind has the capacity to believe anything! Literally, anything. We don’t even do what we know we should.  The spread of fake news and conspiracy theories are just consequences of a flawed and sometimes corrupt government system.   This should all be stunningly clear…as with our inappropriate worship of independence and freedom without responsibility or virtue.

Again.  Every system and structure in our body, our house, our environment, and our world is interconnected and interdependent.  And all depend on the health and sustainable functioning of a just world order.   Our mind’s illusion of independence … disconnects us from our vital needs of love, a safe community, healthy food, and functional relationships.   These vital things we have largely taken for granted.  Thus we have insufficient respect for the natural systems that maintain our planet’s capacity for sustaining all life, human health, future prosperity, and ultimately our species' survival.

There is no guarantee … our nation will last.

The Federalists worried that hostile nations could exploit any domestic divisions. George Washington warned in his farewell address that partisan “factions” could rip the country apart. James Madison feared that liberty could be lost by the “gradual and silent encroachments of those in power.” John Adams said, “There never was a democracy yet, that did not commit suicide”. But, many in our Republic praise democracy, and rightfully blame both parties that are dominating our flawed two-party system that persistently delivers the consequences we are suffering today.

Some are proposing the creation of a “People’s Party”.  This puts too much promise in the will of the masses.   It offers a platform based on creative progressive or conservative ideas that are often devoid of fundamental principles. In other words – they would be engineering a political party that relies on creative and popular proposals that could win a majority.  Yet completely incapable of transforming the profound flaws in our current system and structures at either the national or international levels.

FACT:  Earth has an expiration date. And we the American people (and probably most of humanity) still reflect the opinion offered in the second paragraph of their Declaration of Independence.   It states “accordingly all Experience hath shewn, that Mankind are more disposed to suffer, while Evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the Forms to which they are accustomed.” That’s bad!

But the tragic news is that the suffering that’s coming in our age of Consequences may be so great that our species may expire long, long before Earth. Given the acceleration of technology (WMD proliferation and AI) already knocking on our door, the majority of Americans or others in the world may not even get the chance to suffer the full effects of climate change. Due to a multiplicity of factors, time is NOT on our side.

If you are seeking the most practical action to take, a ‘justice for all’ system it is obvious that it would not be welcomed immediately by most policymakers or political parties.  Such a goal would require the legal protection of inalienable human rights for all and our environment with the force of law (ie the Rule of Law:  laws made and enforced by a democratic process, applied equally to all, and only used to protect human rights and the environment.    The only other option is what we have now.  The law of force.   This is where the protection of national sovereignty is more important than protecting human rights or the environment.  The working definition of ‘national sovereignty (another human-created concept using international law as it exists today with the UN) is the right of any nation to do anything it wants, to anyone it wants, anytime it wants within its own borders.  And, if it has nuclear weapons, it can do these things anywhere it believes it can get away with it.  Again, this is what we have now.  An irresponsible and unaccountable use of force prioritizing national interests which tends to accelerate chaos.  Chaos that often leads to refugees, the loss of freedoms, lives, prosperity, and our planet’s vital life support system.

There is a third option.  It would require the funding of those rights by the force of political will.   President Roosevelt offered the basics in his four freedoms speech; freedom of speech and worship, and freedom from want and … fear.”  Eleanor Roosevelt led the passage of a detailed list known as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.  Like our nation’s Bill of Rights on steroids- but with no means of government enforcement.   Seven decades ago (December 10, 1948) this Declaration was offered in the context of world security. Those who had experienced World War II, the holocaust, and a new weapon that could vaporize 100,000 people in a second understood the essentials of ‘justice for all’ and these fundamental human rights.  But the UN’s lack of democratic power left it useless in this context leaving states' rights above human rights.  This structural flaw in the UN resembles the original flaw in the US Constitution that led to our catastrophic Civil War.

What are some of UDHRs rights intended as a foundation for peace?  Universal access to clean water, safe sanitation, adequate food, access to basic health services, basic education, and an equal opportunity to earn a living wage are good starters.

Fortuitously, the fastest, most affordable, practical, and effective means of maximizing this movement of ‘Liberty and Justice for all” (both here and abroad thus laying the foundation for maximizing humanity's freedom and security globally) is the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).  These have already been agreed on by every nation in 2015 to be achieved by the year 2030.

It’s obvious that we will not get an enforceable Global Bill of Rights any time soon. But we could virtually enforce most essential human rights by funding the SDGs. The growing array of global threats to our freedom and security demands that we do this as rapidly as possible.

A picture containing graphical user interface

Description automatically generated

WARNING!   We have been repeatedly warned of the consequences of failing in prioritizing this human security approach.

In 1980 a bipartisan Presidential Commission concluded  “In the final analysis, unless Americans -- as citizens of an increasingly interdependent world -- place far higher priority on overcoming world hunger, its effects will no longer remain remote or unfamiliar. Nor can we wait until we reach the brink of the precipice; the major actions required do not lend themselves to crisis planning, patchwork management, or emergency financing... The hour is late. Age-old forces of poverty, disease, inequity, and hunger continue to challenge the world. Our humanity demands that we act upon these challenges now...” Presidential Commission on World Hunger, 1980.

Its commissioners specifically warned ...“The most potentially explosive force in the world today is the frustrated desire of poor people to attain a decent standard of living. The anger, despair, and often hatred that result represent real and persistent threats to international order… Neither the cost to national security of allowing malnutrition to spread nor the gain to be derived by a genuine effort to resolve the problem can be predicted or measured in any precise, mathematical way. Nor can monetary value be placed on avoiding the chaos that will ensue unless the United States and the rest of the world begin to develop a common institutional framework for meeting such other critical global threats… Calculable or not, however, this combination of problems now threatens the national security of all countries just as surely as advancing armies or nuclear arsenals.”

They also stated “that promoting economic development in general, and overcoming hunger in particular, are tasks far more critical to the U.S. national security than most policymakers acknowledge or even believe. Since the advent of nuclear weapons, most Americans have been conditioned to equate national security with the strength of strategic military forces. The Commission considers this prevailing belief to be a simplistic illusion. Armed might represents merely the physical aspect of national security. Military force is ultimately useless in the absence of the global security that only coordinated international progress toward social justice can bring.”

In 1990 the nations of the world (including the US) agreed on funding a less ambitious but measurable, achievable, and affordable goals for the year 2000.  This was World Summit for Children.  Even though all governments at the time signed a pledge to “make the resources available” to meet these goals, few were fully funded or achieved.  

In 2000 another more ambitious set of “Millennium Development Goals” was set for the year 2015.  These were also shorted.  Contributing to the wars, terrorism, climate change, refugees, famines, revolutions, state failures, infectious diseases, international crime, and genocides we’ve seen around the world and hounding us today.  Not as separate issues!  But as interdependent consequence.

If we fail this time in achieving the SDGs the deteriorating global conditions may overwhelm any chance of us or our children setting things right.


The discouraging news would appear to be that achieving these 17 goals would cost trillions.  And especially after Covid’s systemic costs, most governments have no money to spare.

The exciting news is that they don’t need to.  Governments just need the political will to freeze and seize a good portion of the estimated $32 trillion dollars that has been stashed in offshore bank accounts for years.  Thousands of accounts obtained by kleptocrats (dictators), oligarchs (their cronies), criminal cartels (drugs, guns, sex, hackers), violent extremist groups (terrorists, white supremacists...), and the extreme wealthy (avoiding taxes).   Most of these ill-gotten gains...should have been going to basic government services.  Now they can be devoted to basic human rights and environmental protection.

The political will could be generated if the general public is aware that their nation’s security and cherished freedoms depend as much on meeting the SDGs as they do on more military spending or a new “Space Force”.

This level of political will in the US could be achieved by progressives working together. With their millions of members personally petitioning their own Members of Congress with loving persistenceThis strategy and daily tactic is infinitely more powerful than voting every 2 or 4 years, protesting, or counter-protesting. If the peace, environment, and economic/social justice movements and their thousands of organizations came together to focus on one piece of legislation on all 435 House members, 100 Senators, and anyone running for these offices, our currently dysfunctional Congress could finally prove useful.  And Americans would finally have a government of “We the people” “by the people, for the people” with “a new birth of freedom” with “liberty and justice for all” that “shall not perish from this earth.” 

In the long run (if we have one) it truly doesn’t matter who is in office or what party they represent.  If fundamental principles are codified into laws, budgets, and all government action we could have the world we know is possible.  On earth, as it is in heaven.  A sustainable global garden of eating.

Given the multiple threats we face as individuals, nations, and a species it must be clear that few threats can be stopped with military power.  And, many are exacerbated by its unprincipled use.


Our primary goal as voters and citizens must be to recognize our global interdependence as the human race and the profound value of ensuring “liberty and justice for all”.  Make it your personal goal to educate your policymakers on this fundamental reality and act as though your life and your children’s future freedoms and security depend on it. 

Connect the dots (everything is connected). See the web of life (all systems and structures are interdependent). Work for justice (always and for all) …or prepare for the consequences (which will inevitably happen and be increasingly catastrophic).

Chuck Woolery, Former Chair, United Nations Association, Council of Organizations
Steven Jay, Founder and Creative Director, Mobilized.news

Thursday, March 10, 2022

Ukraine dilemma "Analysis'? Use Science not Politics

 

RE:  AnalysisAn International Relations Theory Guide to the War in Ukraine: A consideration of which theories have been vindicated—and which have fallen flat.     By Stephen M. Walt, a columnist at Foreign Policy and the Robert and RenĂ©e Belfer professor of international relations at Harvard University.

Dear Editor, 

For the most useful analysis of the political world’s dilemma with Ukraine and Russia, it would be useful to take an actual scientific or engineering approach.  An approach using words that have specific and relatively exact global meanings between all readers...unlike politics, economics, and religion.

First, this educated analysis (or white paper) uses the word “theory” where the word ‘hypothesis’ (educated guess) would be more appropriate.   Second, it would make a clear distinction between theory and law.  

Unfortunately, “international law” is technically only wishful thinking (not made by democratic process or enforceable without war, lethal sanctions, assassinations, or good intentions).  It would be wiser to look to the “Laws of Nature and Nature’s God” for making the most accurate predictions [see the first paragraph of Declaration of Independence]. 

Most people are clear about the “laws of nature’...and I’m hoping most will agree that the laws of “Nature’s God” fundamentally means the Gold Rule.  An unwritten law that is the foundation of every major religion.  Within this grounded context humanity is left with a simple political choice.  Do we live by the ‘rule of law’ or the ‘law of the jungle’?

Given the evolution of weapons technology and its accelerating global affordability, availably, anonymity, power, replicability, and speed of delivery - of multiple forms of WMD (bio, cyber, nano, robotics...and even conventional) we must choose very wisely and quickly - or prepare for the end of civilization as we know it.  

Fundamental to any solution is understanding and abiding by the fact that international law and politics are based on the inherently flawed construct of independence.  This is a human mind’s imaginary concept that exists nowhere in the known universe.   Thus, in reality, our Ukraine dilemma is actually a trilemma.  Most of humanity today wants to maximize their freedoms and security.  But we expect this within the unexamined and mostly unconscious context of independence.  Thus we face a trilemma, not a dilemma.  

Conclusion:  The only way to resolve a trilemma is to pick the two we desire most.  And pick very carefully.   A reading of Thomas Paine’s pamphlet Common Sense will provide a logical and legal solution to this trilemma.  In his political view, the only legitimate purpose of government is to protect human freedom and security. 

Given all people are interdependent on multiple factors... and the recent quote by the head of our nation’s newest federal agency CISA, the Cyber and Infrastructure Security Agency (two years old – the agency, not it's head), “everything is connected, everything is interdependent, and everything is vulnerable” - we must seriously consider her choice of words in a later sentence ...  ‘we need a global approach’.

This, in my opinion, is the only wise “realist perspective on international politics”.  Creating a new global governance system that puts the protection of human rights and the environment above the protection of national sovereignty (independent nations) will be our only earthly salvation.

As Woody Allen once said, “Humanity stands at a crossroad.  One road leads to utter hopelessness and despair.  The other, to complete annihilation.  I hope we have the wisdom to choose the right path.”

An Elon Musk’s reality? ’...burrow a tunnel under the crossroad or move to another planet.’

Another option already exists.  It was globally agreed upon at the United Nations in 2015.  It would mean funding the world’s 17 Sustainable Development Goals by the year 2030.  The world’s oligarchs could afford this and still keep their yachts.

Time is not on our side.  Neither is Putin.