Our nation is in a
state of emergency. And most Americans' arn't happy.
It didn’t start with
Trump’s delusions of terrorist hordes crossing our southern border. It didn’t start with Trump’s rejection of self-evident
truths after our democratic system crowned him President. A year before he colluded to acquire his new
title -- a survey of US national security experts identified our own government’s
“dysfunction” as the second greatest threat to our nation’s security. Terrorism was their top concern. And, if you understood the evolution of
weaponry, the lethal weaponization of social media, the dual use nature of
every technology, and the fact that ever since medieval attackers designed weapons
for breach walls --any offensive attacker now has advantage over any defensive
measures. Especially if the attacker is
willing to die for their cause or has the capacity to remain anonymous (cyber,
bio, drone, self-driving car bombs…) in delivering destruction.
Yet that survey
wasn’t front page news! It was mentioned
on C-Span by a U.S. Senator during a Senate hearing on cyber security within a question
to experts after they offered partial solutions to our cyber ‘freedom-security’
dilemma. A dilemma in which, we (US
citizens, corporations, and all of our government independent agencies) are
free to have and use cyber tools however they want, but our nation will never be free of the potentially catastrophic
national security consequences.
By our intentional government
design we rely on “independent” agencies and national governments to solve a growing
list of globally interdependent problems.
Thus, US national ‘cyber security’ (as well as biosecurity) is an
oxymoron. In fact, security itself is an
illusion in an ungoverned globalized world of unprecedented technological power,
and relatively easy access, and affordability.
Security simply isn’t
possible in the absence of globally responsible and enforceable standards (dare
I say Laws) where any and every law breaker is held accountable for deviations
that cost innocent lives, starts wars, orchestrates mass murders, or undermines
our planet’s life support systems that we all depend on (for our lives, health,
freedom, prosperity, and posterity).
Anyone tallying the
specific costs of the current government shutdown over the border-wall hostage situation
knows that the economic costs of the forced shutdown will reach a price tag
that far exceeds the $5 billion+ ransom that Trump continues to demand. Giving it to him will barely cover the cost
of another 200 miles of physical barriers (and will take years to build) and
set a precedent of future presidential government hostage situations. Meanwhile, cheaper and more effective technological
and ‘manned’ efforts could provide a more effective barrier/deterrent and be
operational in months.
Most senseless is dangers
created by failing to pay for the operations of multiple government agencies responsible
for keeping us safe and healthy (food inspectors, air traffic controllers, TSA agents,
medical researchers, EPA scientists, health studies…). The ramifications of this are a far greater
threat to our nations people, economy, and security than the few ‘bad Hombres’
or deadly narcotics that might eventually cross our borders on foot.
Trump is attempting
to make a small and diminishing immigration burden on our southern border a
national security threat/emergency.
Meanwhile other far greater non-military threats to our individual and
national security get whitewashed. Thus
include climate change, loss of our antibiotic arsenal, the vulnerability of
our vital infrastructure
to cyber-attacks or disrepair, our unsustainable debt, WMD proliferation, an
inevitable pandemic or solar flare, and other natural disasters (volcano’s,
earthquakes, asteroids…). At best, greater investments in border walls or a
stronger military do nothing to protect us against these threats. At worse, the make the threats more likely.
But there’s even a greater
long-term threat. Our mental
health. The United Nation’s annual World
Happiness Report changed little in its national rankings of the usual Top 10” suspects. And the US again, was not there. More surprising, the leading nations had also
experienced a higher ratio of citizens with mental health disorders. A separate
2017 study by the World Health Organization concluded that American, Ukrainian
and Estonian citizens were more likely to develop depression than people
anywhere else in the world. Re-read that
last sentence! But other strongly
affected nations included wealthy nations like New Zealand, Finland, and
Denmark. Other studies with a slightly different
research focus saw severe or worse
mental health issues among children in poorer nations like India. Researchers
fear that such problems are significantly under-reported in many developing
nations.
The mental health
crisis that increasingly appears to affect young people in wealthier nations
has baffled scientists beyond other findings likely explained by poverty or
inequality. Researchers acknowledge they
don’t know for sure but recent studies have cited the use of social media and the
perceptions of not being able to fulfill questionable expectations of family,
friends, partners or employers.
Related reasons could
be that social media and the global images of prosperity, success, happiness
and doom beg disappointing comparisons, unlikely success, fatalistic expectations,
and cataclysmic futures packed with violence, unemployment, harsh weather
conditions and dwindling resources…though none of these are inevitable.
The human mind also
has multiple flaws that hinder success or survival in a rapidly changing world.
One is a western concept of individuality
that is inconsistent with our social biological nature. The creativity of our mind is a double-edged sword
enabling us to invent new things and imagine how to achieve them, but also capable
of believing anything. Literally,
anything! Things that are simply detrimental to human health and survival. On top of that, we don’t even do what we have
been taught and know we should do. What is
that about?
To many Americans falsely
believe that they are entitled to happiness.
They expect it without actually working for it. Our founding fathers only suggested we have
the ‘right to the pursuit of happiness’.
And here’s a damning twist. Their
definition of happiness (following your bliss or fulfilling your life’s purpose
in serving your community) is different than our current public ‘happiness’ expectation
(freedom to do whatever we want without feeling bad or suffering any undesirable
consequences.)
At best, we lazily observe
a direct problem we have, like a persistent cough, and only treat the symptom instead of looking for the systemic failures
in our diet, behavior, government policy, or environmental protection that is the
root cause of the illness. Liberals observe
people killed by guns and believe taking the guns away is the solution. Conservatives see people coming across the border
and see a wall as the solution.
Our own nation’s
Surgeon General warned last year that our greatest public health threat is loneliness. The high rate of gun suicide, opioid overdose,
obesity, greed, festering political tribalism, selfishness and rejection of science
and facts is likely exacerbated by our unexamined assumption that we are
independent. We celebrate this myth
every 4th of July instead of celebrating the profound fundamental
principles that Declaration leads with.
Our mind’s view that who we are, is what we believe (or think we are)… and
not an inseparable body, mind, spirit relationship that is entirely
interdependent with the other people and the environment around us (including every
system and structure in the universe) – is literally killing us.
Catastrophically,
this mental delusion of separateness prevents us from seeing the rest of the
world’s people as our family and essential partners in surviving on this
increasingly troubled planet. Those who
worry about climate change and the destruction of the environment really need
not worry. It’s a waste of energy and as
psychologically dispiriting as listening to President Trump -- and thinking he’s
going to say something that’s true. What’s
true is that the planet and nature will eventually be fine. Earth
has experience at least five mass planetary extinctions in the last few hundred
million years, and each time 90% or more of all life was lost yet each time, millions
of life forms come roaring back.
A few human’s might survive this current mass
extinction we appear to be in. I’m not sure
if they will like it. But unless we
address other existential threats like AI, planet killing asteroids, or solar
mass ejections a few dozen more degrees of climate change will essentially be
the greatest jobs program the world has ever seen. And population control advocates can finally
rest their weary souls.
No comments:
Post a Comment